The academic thought of Russian Soviet scholar Bakhtin has exerted farreaching influence on the worldwide humanities since the second half of the 20th century. Dialogue is the core discourse of Bakhtins humanistic thought. In Bakhtins view, dialogue is everywhere in the field of human society and consciousness, including literary texts, even ″between two separate expressions, which may be far apart in time and space, not knowing one another. However, as long as there is a little convergence in meaning, the dialogic relationship will be revealed...″. Different from monologue and dialogue, the concepts of ″monologism″ and ″dialogism″ proposed by M. Bakhtin belong to the category of ″metalinguistics″, since this dialogic relationship is broader than that of conversational speech.The concept of consensus is the key to understand the dialogue relationship, and the idea of consensus dialogue runs through its theoretical elaboration. If the significance of dialogue lies in differences, divergences and value pluralism, consensus will be the premise and foundation for the existence of dialogue relationship. Dialogue of consensus, or consensus in dialogue, is a communication strategy, which is also regarded as the cornerstone of Bakhtins dialogue theory.The degree of consensus is a genealogy ranging from zero to an infinity including monologue. The monologue is not in opposition with dialogue, but belongs to an extreme dialogic relationship.Even in monologue literary works and sentences, there is a dialogic relationship, which embodies the basic connotation of Bakhtins ″dialogism″.Only in communication can the meaning of ″person in person″ be revealed. Monologue is a kind of distortion of the real relationship between people. It is the suppression of individual content in communication with the help of function role form. Consensus determines the nature and development direction of dialogue relationship, and this situation exists not only in the dialogue between countries, but also in various characters and ideas in literary texts. From the perspective of Christian cultural tradition, if the Old Testament is monologue, then the New Testament with many hidden texts is dialogic. For each individual, there is not only a basic consensus, but also differences and divergences between the two sides of the dialogue. This is the basic state of human existence, and ″convergence″ is the mechanism for reaching greater consensus and mutual understanding. From the perspective of consensus dialogue, various communication and cultural phenomena can be explained, including the tension of literary texts. The ″polyphonic consensus″ emphasized by Bakhtin as ″ethically oriented″ can be applied to analyze all kinds of possible world pictures. And from the perspective of Russian and all other similar cultural traditions, various dialogues based on autocratic hierarchical communication can be used to analyze various communicative situations in the modern society.
· CNKI · Wamfangdata