|
|
|
| Residential Satisfaction among Rural Migrant Workers under the Concept of “Homes for All Workers”: A Study Based on the Migrant Population of Zhejiang Province in 2020 |
| Zhao Guochao1,2, Yu Xiaofen1,2, Xu Luyuan2 |
1.China Academy of Housing & Real Estate, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou 310014, China
2.School of Management, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou 310023, China |
|
|
|
|
Abstract Solving the housing problem for rural migrant workers and realizing “Homes for All Workers” is a basic requirement of people-centered development philosophy. In the past, rural migrant workers flooded into cities, making important contributions to the rapid development of urban economy. However, the housing problem of most migrant workers still exists during this survey. There are problems such as crowded housing and incomplete supporting facilities. For the rural migrant workers, housing is the most basic material condition for them to work and live in cities. Improving the housing status of rural migrant workers and improving their residential satisfaction are of great significance for promoting the healthy development of urban economy.The innovation of this paper is mainly reflected in the following two aspects. One is the innovation of research perspective. In the study of residential satisfaction, difference in research groups may lead to difference in research results. However, few of the existing researches focus on a specific group, and the researches on migrant workers need to be supplemented. Another is the innovation of research content. Residential satisfaction is a comprehensive evaluation index, which can be affected by many factors. A single factor can not reflect the change of migrant workers’ satisfaction. However, there is a lack of researches on the correlation between influencing factors.Based on the sampling survey of floating population in Zhejiang Province in 2020, we mainly focus on the residential satisfaction of migrant workers and 11,298 valid questionnaires were obtained. Furthermore, a Multivariate Logistic Model was used to analyze the main factors affecting residential satisfaction, and the correlation between the influencing factors were analyzed on the basis of traditional researches. The research shows that housing conditions, number of people living together, and living area have more impact on the residential satisfaction compared with income and rental costs, while housing conditions are the most important factor. Among housing conditions, kitchens, sound insulation, and lighting have a greater impact. To further explore the cross impact, four composite variables are constructed to carry out a correlation analysis. Results show that the impact of composite variables is more obvious compared with single variables while per capita living area and rental income ratio are more significant. As the per capita living area decreases, the probability that rural migrant workers tend to be negatively evaluated increases. With the decrease of the rental income ratio, the probability of negative evaluation appears to be an inverted U shape. We believe that various factors should be taken into account to solve the housing problem of migrant workers. First, the housing conditions of migrant workers should be improved, especially sound insulation and lighting. Second, cost-effective rental housing and employee dormitories for migrant workers should be built through the balancing of the factors affecting residential satisfaction. Third, we should regulate the management of the housing market of migrant workers and supervise unreasonable residence.
|
|
Received: 07 March 2022
|
|
|
|
1 习近平： 《以建设和谐社会的理念有效解决好农民工问题——对浙江省的调查与思考》，《政策瞭望》2005年第10期，第4-7页。
2 周建华、刘建江： 《农民工城市住房支持的政策因应》，《农村经济》2014年第7期，第103-107页。
3 熊景维： 《农民工的城市住房困境及其解决路径》，《城市问题》2016年第5期，第98-103页。
4 王永志： 《农民工城市住房问题及其解决对策——基于中国八大城市的调查与分析》，《中共石家庄市委党校学报》2017年第5期，第34-37页。
5 和红、王硕： 《不同流入地青年流动人口的社会支持与生活满意度》，《人口研究》2016年第3期，第45-57页。
6 吴菲、王俊秀： 《相对收入与主观幸福感：检验农民工的多重参照群体》，《社会》2017年第2期，第74-105页。
7 Dekker K.， de Vos S. & Musterd S. et al.， “Residential satisfaction in housing estates in European cities： a multi-level research approach，” Housing Studies， Vol. 26， No. 4 （2011）， pp. 479-499.
8 Garrod G. D. & Willis K. G.， “Valuing goods’ characteristics： an application of the Hedonic Price Method to environmental attributes，” Journal of Environmental Management， Vol. 34， No. 1 （1992）， pp. 59-76.
9 Lu M.， “Determinants of residential satisfaction： ordered logit vs. regression models，” Growth and Change， Vol. 30， No. 2 （1999）， pp. 264-287.
10 Mccrea R.， Stimson M. & Western J.， “Testing a moderated model of satisfaction with urban living using data for Brisbane-South East Queensland， Australia，” Social Indicators Research， Vol. 72， No. 2 （2005）， pp. 121-152.
11 Lee S. W.， Ellis C. D. & Kweon B. S.， “Relationship between landscape structure and neighborhood satisfaction in urbanized areas，” Landscape and Urban Lanning， Vol. 85， No. 1 （2008）， pp. 60-70.
12 费菊瑛、王裕华： 《民工人力资本、可行能力与生活满意度》，《财贸经济》2010年第8期，第128-135页。
13 刘义、刘于琪、刘晔等： 《邻里环境对流动人口主观幸福感的影响——基于广州的实证》，《地理科学进展》2018年第7期，第986-998页。
14 van Praag B. & Ferrer-i-Carbonell A.， Happiness Quantified： A Satisfaction Calculus Approach， Oxford： Oxford University Press， 2004.
15 刘贵文、张运生、徐鹏鹏： 《公租房住户满意度综合评价》，《建筑经济》2013年第9期，第79-83页。
16 李志刚： 《中国城市“新移民”聚居区居住满意度研究——以北京、上海、广州为例》，《城市规划》2011年第12期，第75-82页。
17 林赛南、李志刚、郭炎： 《流动人口的“临时性”特征与居住满意度研究——以温州市为例》，《现代城市研究》2018年第12期，第125-132页。
18 汤爽爽、冯建喜： 《新生代农村流动人口内部生活满意度差异研究——以江苏省为例》，《人口与经济》2016年第3期，第52-61页。
19 湛东升、孟斌、张文忠： 《北京市居民居住满意度感知与行为意向研究》，《地理研究》2014年第2期，第336-348页。
20 何立华、杨崇琪： 《城市居民住房满意度及其影响因素》，《公共管理学报》2011年第2期，第43-51页。
21 池宇杭： 《南京青年人才租赁住房满意度及其影响因素研究》，《上海房地》2021年第1期，第34-40页。 |
|
|
|
2022, Vol. 52 
