|
|
|
| The Colonization Tendency of Preparatory Education for Chinese Students at the East Asian Higher Preparatory School |
| Yu Zixia, He Yunfei |
| College of Education, Central China Normal University, Wuhan 430079, China |
|
|
|
|
Abstract The East Asian Higher Preparatory School was an educational institution in Japan which specialized in receiving Chinese students and teaching them Japanese language. It occupied an important position in the history of educational exchanges between China and Japan in modern times and was called “the stronghold of Chinese education in Japan” by the well-known Japanese scholar Sanetou Keishuu. During its more than 30 years of existence, the school solved the Japanese language problem for many Chinese students, and famous figures such as Zhou Enlai, Qiu Jin and Xiao Hong received some schooling here. After the restoration of diplomatic relations between China and Japan, Zhou Enlai’s wife Deng Yingchao visited Japan and expressed the gratitude to Matsumoto Kamejiro’s surviving family for his teachings to Zhou Enlai during her visit to Japan, and this in turn triggered a wave of Japanese research on Matsumoto Kamejiro in Japan. By comparison, research by Chinese scholars on Kamejiro and the school he founded appear to be very limited in number and range. There are a few articles that have briefly discussed Kamejiro and the school in the context of the Sino-Japan Association, and other researches have overlooked it altogether, confusing domestic scholars who study the educational exchanges between China and Japan when they first faced Matsumoto and the East Asian Higher Preparatory School. This paper begins to redress this, starting from the education of students studying in Japan, and exploring the influence of militarism on normal preparatory education of Chinese students at the East Asian Higher Preparatory School as a turn to colonization education. This is intended to clarify the development of an important characteristic of Sino-Japanese relations in modern times and to make up for the lack of domestic research on the institution.The original intention of the East Asian Higher Preparatory School was to cultivate nation-building talents for China. However, with the Japanese invasion of China,and the change of the school from private to public, the Japanese Ministry of Foreign Affairs took control of the school’s funding,and explicitly changed the school’s constitution to become an instrument of the colonial and wartime enterprise.This mission then gradually infiltrated personnel recruitment, curriculum settings, and other operational aspects. In this way the school became an important base for Japanese political and military authority to cultivate pioneers of colonialism by “using Chinese to subdue Chinese”. For example, Akuma Shinyi and others were assigned to monitor “abnormal behavior” in students, a higher education department was set up to cultivate “outstanding talents of East Asian culture”, and extracurricular activities such as summer groups and hiking clubs were organized to counter students’ anti-Japanese sentiment. These measures propagated ideas of the superiority of Japanese national culture and targeted training activities of colonial education, putting the Chinese students into an atmosphere of all-round “thriving Asian colonial education”, so as to eliminate their patriotic consciousness. After the July 7 Incident, the East Asian Higher Preparatory School could be described as carrying-out various forms of “brainwashing” of students. With some exceptions, it is clear that this schooling had the opposite effect, and that the vast majority of students resisted this colonial schooling at the East Asian Higher Preparatory School. Most returned to China to resistance activities driven by their own national sense, perhaps even paradoxically reinforced by the expectations of the Japanese political authority.
|
|
Received: 16 November 2021
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
東亜学校： 『東亜学校案内』，東京：東亜学校，1940年。2 汪向荣： 《松本龟次郎访问记》，《日本评论》1941年第2期，第104-108页。3 日］松本龟次郎述： 《中华民国留学生教育的沿革（续完）》，韩逋仙译，《留东学报》1936年第4期，第59-73页。4 汪向荣： 《日本教习》，北京：生活·读书·新知三联书店，1988年。5 日］武田胜彦： 《桥：一个日本人的一生》，北京：生活·读书·新知三联书店，1992年。6 砂田實： 『日華学会二十年史』，東京：日華学会，1939年。7 日］松本龟次郎： 《中国留学生教育之回顾与前瞻》，《日本评论》1941年第3期，第99-107页。8 锡福： 《大战发动前夕日本朝野的动态》，《大公报》（上海）1937年8月20日，第5版。9 佚名： 《共荣圈各地 留日生大增》，《申报》1943年8月7日，第2版。10 日華学会編： 『財団法人日華学会年報第28回』，東京：日華学会，1945年。11 二見剛史： 「東亜学校と松本亀次郎：戦時下の動向を中心として」，『国立教育研究所紀要』1992年第3期，185-197頁。12 《东亚高等预备学校章程》，《奉天公报》1926年第5187期，第12-16页。13 日華学会編： 『財団法人日華学会年報第25回』，東京：日華学会，1942年。14 杨正光、［日］平野日出雄： 《松本龟次郎传》，北京：时事出版社，1985年。15 東亜高等予備学校： 『日本語読本』巻2，東京：東亜高等予備学校，1934年。16 日華学会： 「東亜学校高等科学生の大東亜戦争献金」，『日華学報』1942年第87期，60-61頁。17 日華学会： 「東亜学校記事」，『日華学報』1942年第92期，41-43頁。18 《岁月流金》编委会编： 《岁月流金·记石油科技专家》（二），北京：石油工业出版社，1998年。19 胡绍轩： 《现代文坛风云录》，重庆：重庆出版社，1991年。20 韓立冬： 「東亜学校の中国人留学生予備教育：特設予科との関係を中心に」，『年報 地域文化研究』2013年第16期，45-73頁。21 日華学会編： 『財団法人日華学会年報第26回』，東京：日華学会，1943年。22 日華学会編： 『財団法人日華学会年報第27回』，東京：日華学会，1944年。23 日華学会編： 『財団法人日華学会年報第24回』，東京：日華学会，1941年。24 日華学会編： 『財団法人日華学会年報第20回』，東京：日華学会，1937年。25 佚名： 《东京通信：东亚高等预备学校概况 中国留学生多就此补习》，《大公报》（天津）1934年8月3日，第4版。26 松本亀次郎： 『譯解日語肯綮大全』，東京：有隣書屋，1935年。27 王奇生： 《中国留学生的历史轨迹（1872—1949）》，武汉：湖北教育出版社，1992年。28 佚名：《留日学生 发表感想》，《申报》1943年1月10日，第3版。29 徐志民： 《放任自流与优待主义：日本对民国初期留日学生的政策（1912—1917）》，《民国档案》2019年第2期，第96-111页。
|
|
|
|
2022, Vol. 52 
