从戴复古“不甚读书”的争论看南宋诗风的演变

doi:10.3785/j.issn.1008-942X.CN33-6000/C.2021.11.031

Abstract
Figure/Table
References
Related Citation (14)

Download: PDF (854 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract Dai Fugu had to drop out of school at an early age. When he grew up, he aspired to become a poet like his father. He studied hard, travelled far, learned from various famed poets, and eventually established himself as one of the representative figures in the Jianghu School of poets. Still, there exist two divergent perspectives on whether Dai Fugu could be considered a well-read poet or not. One viewpoint argues that Dai Fugu could not be considered a learned poet since he had little formal education, and in their words was “with an empty head”, while another asserts that Dai studied so assiduously and persistently that he became a poet of great learning. This argument over Dai’s learnedness still has not been resolved. This author will argue in this article that there is ample evidence in Dai Fugu’s own works, to demonstrate that Dai read not only voluminously, but also expansively, from Confucian classics, historical records, philosophical writings, and miscellaneous works to everything in between. Moreover, Dai Fugu could apply what he read into his own poetry writings, resulting in his unique collections of poems with wide-ranging styles and techniques. Dai was adept at employing various methods, techniques, and styles to suit his creations. For example, sometimes he would utilize a plain and direct style in his poems, letting emotions naturally seep out, while at other times, he would cite famed quotations rendering his poems magnificent artifacts, and earning high praises from his peers and critics. This author believes that the reason for so much dispute over so many years is explainable by the changes in the literary scenes of the time. When he had just become a poet, the literary world, especially the world of poetry, was dominated for years by the Jiangxi School of style, which promoted poetry as the result of learnedness, while Dai himself, was ashamed of not being well educated, so kept studying very hard, hoping to remedy this shortcoming. But times changed later: the Yongjia Four Geniuses rose to prominence representing the late Tang poetic style, which rid themselves off the so-called “learnedness” baggage. Instead, they favored artistic plainness and directness, and as a result, Dai’s poetry received wide acclaim. However, Dai Fugu realized either school of the poetic styles had its own limitations, compared poems of different times, especially those written during the high times of the Tang Dynasty, and promoted styles evident in Du Fu’s poetry. This revelation of what constituted poetic merits resulted, clearly from his lifelong wide and expansive readings, and from his constant critiquing and comparing poems of previous times. Today, reading through Dai’s poems, this author can find clear traces of evidence that Dai as not only an eminent poet, but also a well-learned scholar.

Key words： Dai Fugu learnedness poetic styles of the Southern Song Dynasty evolution

Received: 03 November 2021

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	Fei Junqing
	Lou Pei

Cite this article:

Fei Junqing,Lou Pei. Evolution of the Poetic Styles in the Southern Song Dynasty as Seen from the Divergent Perceptions Towards Dai Fugu’s “Learnedness”[J]. JOURNAL OF ZHEJIANG UNIVERSITY, 2022, 52(3): 72-83.

URL:

https://www.zjujournals.com/soc/EN/10.3785/j.issn.1008-942X.CN33-6000/C.2021.11.031 OR https://www.zjujournals.com/soc/EN/Y2022/V52/I3/72

1 曹寅编：《全唐诗》，北京：中华书局，1960 年。
2 苏轼：《苏轼诗集》，北京：中华书局，1984年。
3 吴茂云校注：《戴复古全集校注》，北京：中国文史出版社，2008年。
4 方回选评、李庆甲集评校点：《瀛奎律髓汇评》，上海：上海古籍出版社，1986年。
5 方回：《桐江集》，见《丛书集成三编》第47册，台北：新文丰出版公司，1997年。
6 戴复古：《戴复古集》，吴茂云、郑伟荣校点，杭州：浙江大学出版社，2012年。
7 齐治平：《唐宋诗之争概述》，长沙：岳麓书社，1983年。
8 钱谦益：《列朝诗集小传》，上海：上海古籍出版社，1983年。
9 杨慎：《词品》，岳淑珍导读，上海：上海古籍出版社，2009年。
10 钱锺书：《钱锺书手稿集》，北京：商务印书馆，2003年。
11 毛晋辑：《宋六十名家词》，上海：上海古籍出版社，1989年。
12 罗宁：《戴复古诗歌用典初探》，见张伯伟、蒋寅主编：《中国诗学》第26辑，北京：人民文学出版社，2018年，第93-117页。
13 严羽：《沧浪诗话校释》，郭绍虞校释，北京：人民文学出版社，1983年。
14 胡仔纂集：《苕溪渔隐丛话》，廖德明校点，北京：人民文学出版社，1984年。
15 黄庭坚：《黄庭坚全集》，刘琳、李勇先、王蓉贵点校，北京：中华书局，2021年。
16 杨万里：《杨万里集笺校》，辛更儒笺校，北京：中华书局，2007年。
17 陆游：《剑南诗稿校注》，钱仲联校注，上海：上海古籍出版社，1985年。
18 孔凡礼、齐治平编：《陆游资料汇编》，北京：中华书局，1962年。
19 陶秋英编选：《宋金元文论选》，北京：人民文学出版社，1984年。
20 程毅中主编：《宋人诗话外编》，北京：国际文化出版公司，1996年。
21 黄宗羲：《宋元学案》，见沈善洪主编：《黄宗羲全集》第5册，杭州：浙江古籍出版社，1992年。
22 叶适：《叶适集》，刘公纯、王孝鱼、李哲夫点校，北京：中华书局，1961年。
23 李修生主编：《全元文》第11册，南京：江苏古籍出版社，1999年。
24 刘克庄：《刘克庄集笺校》，辛更儒笺校，北京：中华书局，2011年。
25 费君清：《永嘉四灵的兴起与南宋诗风的嬗变》，见张高评主编：《宋代文学研究丛刊》第6期，高雄：丽文文化事业公司，2000年，第199-215页。
26 黄震：《黄氏日抄》，见张伟、何忠礼主编：《黄震全集》，杭州：浙江大学出版社，2013年。