|
|
|
| Subjectivity Construction of Cultural Self-confidence by Cultural Self-behavior |
| Han Qinzhao |
| School of Marxism, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China |
|
|
|
|
Abstract Cultural self-behavior is a rational stage of cultural development, a conscious state of existence in which the cultural subject recognizes and constructs a culture with conscious awareness or a way of thinking and transcendence of the unconsciousness and purposelessness of cultural self-activity. Its core lies in the reflective cognition and creative leadership of the cultural subject to the national culture. Among them, reflective cognition of culture is the recognition of cognition by the cultural subject, which includes both the active awareness and examination of the culture in the unconscious state of self and the inner grasp of the law of cultural development and the actual state of culture by the cultural subject. The creative leadership of a culture is the unfolding state of cultural self-behavior. Based on the abandonment of a certain culture and the contribution of wisdom to the world, it is the fusion of critical inheritance and creative development of culture.Cultural self-behavior makes culture move from an unconscious state of self-consciousness to a conscious state of consciousness and promotes cultural development from spontaneous and blind perceptual activities to planned and purposeful rational practice. It promotes cultural self-confidence by enhancing cultural subjects’ autonomy, consciousness, and creativity in their cultural development. Specifically, cultural self-behavior determines the national cultural identity and establishes the prerequisite for cultural self-confidence through the awakening of cultural memory and the appropriate promotion of cultural nationality. Cultural self-behavior enhances cultural stickiness through the enhancement of cultural cohesion and attractiveness to consolidate the identity foundation of cultural confidence. By enhancing the right to express cultural discourse, the right to set up cultural issues, and the right to lead cultural discourses, cultural self-behavior enhances cultural discourse power to respond to the needs of the times for cultural self-confidence.The key to the realization of cultural self-confidence lies in transforming the cultivation object of cultural self-confidence from a passive and blind other-regulated object to a conscious and active self-regulated subject. By awakening individual historicality and the “inner self ”, introducing cultural governance concepts, and cultivating the double consciousness of Chinese cultural discourse, cultural self-behavior can activate individual subjectivity, condense collective subjectivity, and forge discourse subjectivity, thereby realizing the subjective construction of cultural self-confidence.As an advanced stage in the development of cultural subjectivity, cultural self-behavior has been discussed in academic circles for a long time. However, there is a lack of a clear definition of its connotations. The core connotation of cultural self-behavior is summarized as the dual structure of reflective cognition and creative leadership of cultural subjects, realizing the interpretation of the concept of cultural self-actualization from two levels of cognitive reality and value contingency. In addition, among the many discussions on the generation of cultural self-confidence, no in-depth study has been found from the philosophical perspective of cultural self-behavior. Cultural self-behavior not only realizes the evidence of cultural self-confidence from three aspects of cultural identity, cultural stickiness, and cultural discourse, but also realizes the construction of subjectification of cultural self-confidence from three aspects of individual subjectivity, collective subjectivity, and discourse subjectivity, and promotes the generation of cultural self-confidence.
|
|
Received: 17 May 2021
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
吴晓明： 《论当代中国学术话语体系的自主建构》，《中国社会科学》2011年第2期，第5-16页。2 中共中央编译局编译： 《马克思恩格斯文集》第1卷，北京：人民出版社，2009年。3 冯契： 《智慧的探索》，上海：华东师范大学出版社，1994年。4 冯契： 《人的自由和真善美》，上海：华东师范大学出版社，1996年。5 苗伟： 《论人的文化主体性》，《云南社会科学》2012年第4期，第55-60页。6 费孝通： 《文化自觉的思想来源与现实意义》，《文史哲》2003年第3期，第15-16页。7 孙美堂、杜中臣： 《文化即“人化”——文化概念的一种诠释及其意义》，《中国人民大学学报》2004年第6期，第35-40页。8 郭湛： 《主体性哲学——人的存在及其意义》（修订版），北京：中国人民大学出版社，2010年。9 李来容： 《文化自信内在特质与发展理路的多维探析》，《天津社会科学》2019年第6期，第71-74页。10 美］弗郎西斯·福山： 《信任：社会美德与创造经济繁荣》，郭华译，桂林：广西师范大学出版社，2016年。11 杨生平、谢玉亮： 《全球化时代的文化身份与中国文化主体性建构》，《马克思主义与现实》2015年第2期，第181-185页。12 李晓燕： 《“主体间承认”与体系内文化安全——以中国参与国际人权机制为例》，《世界经济与政治》2014年第7期，第103-117，159页。13 项久雨： 《新发展理念与文化自信》，《中国社会科学》2018年第6期，第4-25，204页。14 习近平： 《习近平谈治国理政》第二卷，北京：外文出版社，2017年。15 丁立群： 《文化自信的哲学省思》，《天津社会科学》2018年第5期，第23-29页。16 习近平： 《坚定文化自信，建设社会主义文化强国》，《求是》2019年第12期，第4-12页。17 齐勇锋、李平凡： 《完善公共文化服务体系 提高国家文化软实力》，《中国特色社会主义研究》2012年第1期，第64-72页。18 吴理财： 《把治理引入公共文化服务》，《探索与争鸣》2012年第6期，第51-54页。19 张鸿雁： 《“文化治理模式”的理论与实践创新——建构全面深化改革的“文化自觉”与“文化自为”》，《社会科学》2015年第3期，第3-10页。20 李兰芬： 《国家认同视域下的公民道德建设》，《中国社会科学》2014第12期，第4-21，205页。21 胡惠林： 《国家文化治理：发展文化产业的新维度》，《学术月刊》2012年第5期，第28-32页。22 德］汉斯-格奥尔格·加达默尔： 《真理与方法》下卷，洪汉鼎译，上海：上海译文出版社，1999年。23 德］威廉·冯·洪堡特： 《论人类语言结构的差异及其对人类精神发展的影响》，姚小平译，北京：商务印书馆，1999年。24 朱贻庭： 《“源原之辨”与“古今通理”——继承和发展传统文化的方法论新探》，《探索与争鸣》2015年第1期，第68-72页。25 夏银平、何衍林： 《从时间叙事到空间叙事：人类命运共同体对全球现代性的话语重构》，《理论与改革》2021年第4期，第37-46页。
|
|
|
|
2022, Vol. 52 
