论西方女性气质概念的建构、解构与重构

doi:10.3785/j.issn.1008-942X.CN33-6000/C.2023.08.141

Abstract
Figure/Table
References
Related Citation (6)

Download: PDF (849 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract The concept of “femininity” in the West carries a multi-facet and progressive understanding of women’s social identity, gender characteristics, body style and spirit of life. Its connotations can be sorted out from the three stages of construction, deconstruction and reconstruction in patriarchal culture, feminist movement and criticism, and interdisciplinary research. In order to maintain the hegemonic position of men, patriarchal culture constructs the subordinate, accompanying and normative characteristics of femininity from the perspectives of social reality, literary fiction and ideology, and divides them into “emphasized femininity”, “hegemonic femininity”, “pariah femininity”, “subordinate femininity” and so on, to celebrate subordinate femininity and devalue autonomous femininity. Feminist movement and criticism have both gone through developmental stages of deconstructing and constructing femininity. Feminist movement takes social reality as its object of study, which attacks the status quo of inequality between men and women, and criticizes and denies the femininity constructed by patriarchy, and calling for attention to the gender differences between men and women. Feminists, on the basis of post-structuralist and Western Marxist theories, articulate the view that femininity is not externally imposed but is manifested by the female body, pointing out that the physical and cultural characteristics of women that patriarchy defines as “deficient” and “lacking” are precisely the manifestations of femininity. British and American feminist criticism and French feminist criticism take literary works as the object of study, and through analyzing female image and female writing, they respectively elucidate the transmutation process of femininity from self-sacrifice to self-fantasy and self-escape to self-construction and the qualities of female discourse such as ecriture feminine and parler-femme. Interdisciplinary research has not only provided a general overview of femininity in terms of physical appearance, ethical orientation, caring and nurturing abilities, psychological and personality traits, but also provided in-depth ethical, spatial, and psychological reconstructions of the characteristics of femininity. From the ethical dimension, academics have put forward the idea that the ethics of caring and the ethics of virtue are the core elements of femininity, affirming the importance of women’s virtues of caring, empathy, and altruism so as to break through the limitation of femininity that is confined to the body, and to examine in depth the value of women’s personalities and thoughts. From the spatial dimension, academics have analyzed the important role of the domestic space as the basis for the reconstruction of women’s images and identities, and have proposed that the domestic space be regarded as a culturally valuable place as a means of enhancing the identification of the social nature of femininity. From a psychological perspective, the concept of “conscious femininity” has been proposed to reveal the intuitive, perceptive and harmonious features of the female psyche and its value, and to deepen the understanding of the female psyche and mind. The construction, deconstruction and reconstruction of the concept of “femininity” illustrate the development of the Western understanding of gender from social to cultural to spiritual. By examining the historical origin and cutting-edge progress of the concept of “femininity” from social, historical, cultural, literary, gender, ethical, spatial, and psychological perspectives, and by revealing its constructive nature, we can not only reassess the achievements and value of feminist thought and criticism, but also recognize the necessity and importance of interdisciplinary research on feminism, gender studies, and literary criticism.

Key words： femininity patriarchy feminist movement feminist criticism interdisciplinary studies ethics of care feminist psychology

Received: 14 August 2023

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	Gao Fen
	Ye Xiaojuan

Cite this article:

Gao Fen,Ye Xiaojuan. Construction, Deconstruction and Reconstruction of the Western Concept of “Femininity”[J]. JOURNAL OF ZHEJIANG UNIVERSITY, 2024, 54(10): 137-149.

URL:

https://www.zjujournals.com/soc/EN/10.3785/j.issn.1008-942X.CN33-6000/C.2023.08.141 OR https://www.zjujournals.com/soc/EN/Y2024/V54/I10/137

1 Frosh S.， The Politics of Psychoanalysis： An Introduction to Freudian and Post-Freudian Theory， Houndmills： Macmillan Education Ltd.， 1987.
2 Dahl U. & Sunden J.， “Femininity in European Journal of Women’s Studies，” European Journal of Women’s Studies， Vol. 25， No. 3 （2018）， pp. 269-277.
3 Hoskin R. A. & Blair K. L.， “Critical femininities： a ‘new’ approach to gender theory，” Psychology & Sexuality， Vol. 13， No. 1 （2022）， pp. 1-8.
4 Fiorini L. G. & Rose G. A.， On Freud’s Femininity， London： Routledge， 2010.
5 美］桑德拉·李·巴特基：《福柯、女性气质和父权制力量的现代化》，见［美］佩吉·麦克拉肯主编：《女权主义理论读本》，桂林：广西师范大学出版社，2007年，第286-315页。
6 Connell R. W.， Gender and Power： Society， the Person and Sexual Politics， Sydney： Allen & Unwin， 1987.
7 Woolf V.， A Room of One’s Own， San Diego： Harcourt Brace Jovanovich， Inc.， 1957.
8 法］西蒙娜·德·波伏娃：《第二性》，陶铁柱译，北京：中国书籍出版社，1998年。
9 Freud S.， “Femininity ［Lecture XXXIII］，” in Strachey J. （ed.）， New Introductory Lectures on Psycho-analysis， New York： W. W. Norton & Co.， 1933， pp. 112-134.
10 Riviere J.， “Womanliness as a masquerade，” International Journal of Psychoanalysis， Vol. 10 （1929）， pp. 303-313.
11 Mills J.， Womanwords： A Dictionary of Words about Women （1st American edition）， New York： Maxwell Macmillan International， 1992.
12 英］威廉·莎士比亚：《莎士比亚全集》（第8卷），朱生豪译，北京：人民出版社，1991年。
13 Scharff C.， “Femininities，” in Evans M. & Williams C. （eds.）， Gender： The Key Concepts， New York： Routledge， 2013， pp. 59-64.
14 Stets J. E. & Burke P. J.， “Femininity/masculinity，” in Borgatta E. F. & Montgomery R. J. V. （eds.）， Encyclopedia of Sociology， New York： Macmillan， 2000， pp. 997-1005.
15 Hudson B.， “Femininity and adolescence，” in McRobbie A. & Nava M. （eds.）， Gender and Generation， London： Macmillan， 1984， pp. 31-53.
16 Milkie M. A.， “Contested images of femininity： an analysis of cultural gatekeepers’ struggles with the ‘real girl’ critique，” Gender & Society， Vol. 16， No. 6 （2002）， pp. 839-859.
17 Schippers M.， “Recovering the feminine other： masculinity， femininity， and gender hegemony，” Theory and Society， Vol. 36 （2007）， pp. 85-102.
18 Messerschmidt J. W.， “The struggle for heterofeminine recognition： bullying， embodiment， and reactive sexual offending by adolescent girls，” Feminist Criminology， Vol. 6， No. 3 （2011）， pp. 203-233.
19 Wollstonecraft M.， Political Writings， Mineola： Dover Publications， 1996.
20 Hollows J.， Feminism， Femininity and Popular Culture， Manchester： Manchester University Press， 2000.
21 Friedan B.， The Feminine Mystique， New York： Laurel， 1983.
22 Gamble S.， The Routledge Companion to Feminism and Postfeminism， London： Routledge， 2002.
23 Frye M.， The Politics of Reality： Essays in Feminist Theory， New York： Crossing Press， 1983.
24 Daly M.， Pure Lust： Elemental Feminist Philosophy， Boston： Beacon Press， 1984.
25 Brownmiller S.， Femininity， New York： Linden Press， 1984.
26 Wolf N.， The Beauty Myth： How Images of Beauty Are Used Against Women， London： Vintage Publishing， 1990.
27 Gill R.， Gender and the Media， Cambridge： Polity Press， 2007.
28 Gauntlett D.， “Madonna’s daughters： girl power and the empowered girl-pop breakthrough，” in Fouz-Hernandez S. & Jarman-Ivens F. （eds.）， Madonna’s Drowned Worlds： New Approaches to Her Cultural Transformations， 1983-2003， London： Routledge， 2017， pp. 161-175.
29 Walter N.， The New Feminism， Malvern： Virago Press， 1999.
30 澳］杰梅茵·格里尔：《完整的女人》，欧阳昱译，天津：百花文艺出版社，2001年。
31 Dibben N.， “Representations of femininity in popular music，” Popular Music， Vol. 18， No. 3 （1999）， pp. 331-355.
32 Gill R.， “Empowerment/sexism： figuring female sexual agency in contemporary advertising，” Feminism & Psychology， Vol. 18， No. 1 （2008）， pp. 35-60.
33 Weedon C.， Feminist Practice and Poststructuralist Theory， Oxford： Basil Blackwell， 1987.
34 Ellmann M.， Thinking about Women， New York： Brace & World， 1968.
35 美］凯特·米利特：《性政治》，宋文伟译，南京：江苏人民出版社，2000年。
36 美］伊莱恩·肖瓦尔特：《她们自己的文学·英国女小说家：从勃朗特到莱辛》，韩敏中译，杭州：浙江大学出版社，2012年。
37 美］托雷尔·莫依：《女权主义文学批评》，陈本益译，《文艺理论与批评》1990年第6期，第112-116页。
38 Riley D.， “Am I that Name？” Feminism and the Category of “Women” in History， Minneapolis： University of Minnesota Press， 1988.
39 何成洲、［美］伊丽莎白·韦德主编：《当代美国女性主义经典理论选读》，南京：南京大学出版社，2014年。
40 Carby H. V.， Reconstructing Womanhood： The Emergence of the Afro-American Novelist， Oxford： Oxford University Press， 1987.
41 Showalter E.， The New Feminist Criticism， New York： Pantheon Books， 1985.
42 Cixous H.， “The laugh of the Medusa，” Signs， Vol. 1， No. 4 （1976）， pp. 875-893.
43 Kristeva J.， About Chinese Women， trans. by Burrows A.， London： Marion Boyars Publishers Ltd.， 1977.
44 Irigaray L.， “Women’s exile，” Ideology and Consciousness， Vol. 1 （1997）， pp. 24-39.
45 Irigaray L.， This Sex Which Is Not One， New York： Cornell university press， 1985.
46 Serano J.， Whipping Girl： A Transsexual Woman on Sexism and the Scapegoating of Femininity， Emeryville： Seal Press， 2007.
47 Morawski J. G.， “Femininity，” in Tierney H. （ed.）， Women’s Studies Encyclopedia， Vol. 1： Views from the Sciences， New York： Greenwood Press， 1989， pp. 136-139.
48 Tuttle L.， Encyclopedia of Feminism， London： Longman， 1986.
49 Noddings N.， Caring： A Feminine Approach to Ethics and Moral Education， Berkeley： University of California Press， 1984.
50 Chodorow N.， “Family structure and feminine personality，” in Rosaldo. M. Z. & Lamphere L. （eds.）， Woman， Culture， and Society， Stanford： Stanford University Press， 1974， pp. 43-66.
51 Chodorow N.， Individualizing Gender and Sexuality： Theory and Practice， New York： Routledge， 2012.
52 美］卡罗尔·吉利根：《不同的声音：心理学理论与妇女发展》，肖巍译，北京：中央编译出版社， 1999年。
53 Dillon R.， “Feminist approaches to virtue ethics，” in Snow N. E. （ed.）， The Oxford Handbook of Virtue， New York： Oxford University Press， 2017， pp. 377-397.
54 Massey D.， Space， Place， and Gender， Minneapolis： University of Minnesota Press， 1994.
55 Harvey D.， “Between space and time： reflections on the geographical imagination，” Annals of the Association of American Geographers， Vol. 80， No. 3 （1990）， pp. 418-434.
56 Steele R. & Addison J.， Selections from the Tatler and the Spectator， London： Penguin Classics， 1982.
57 McDowell L.， Gender， Identity and Place： Understanding Feminist Geographies， Minnesota： University of Minnesota Press， 1999.
58 Johnson L. & Lloyd J.， Sentenced to Everyday Life： Feminism and the Housewife， Oxford： Berg， 2004.
59 Hooks B.， Yearning： Race， Gender， and Cultural Politics， Boston： South End Press， 1990.
60 Strouse J.， Women and Analysis， New York： Grossman， 1974.
61 Fummoto L.， “Gender and the history of psychology，” in Clinchy B. M. & Norem J. K. （eds.）， The Gender and Psychological Reader， New York： New York University Press， 1988， pp. 69-77.
62 Felman S.， “Rereading femininity，” Yale French Studies， Vol. 62 （1981）， pp. 19-44.
63 Woodman M.， Conscious Femininity： Interviews with Marion Woodman， Toronto： Inner City Books， 1993.
64 Fiorini L. G.， Deconstructing the Feminine： Psychoanalysis， Gender and Theories of Complexity， London： Routledge， 2018.