|
|
|
| Can Farming Population Aging Encourage Farmers’ Adoption of Agricultural Mechanization Services? |
| Qiu Tongwei, Qiao Zhiqian |
| College of Economics and Management, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing210095, China |
|
|
|
|
Abstract In recent years, the sharp rise in agricultural production costs, particularly labor costs, has driven up a significant demand for labor-saving alternatives in China. This need is especially urgent given the ongoing aging of the agricultural workforce. For labor-intensive tasks in agriculture, mechanization appears to be a necessary response to the challenges posed by farming population aging (FPA). Agricultural mechanization services (AMS) are particularly appealing because they reduce the sunk costs associated with owning agricultural machinery for small farmers, thereby enhancing their access to such equipment. Moreover, AMS have a greater impact on improving agricultural productivity than self-owned machinery.The central question is whether the FPA will inevitably increase farmers’ demand for AMS. Logically, FPA could either heighten farmers’ demand for labor-saving AMS or decrease their demand by altering their factor allocation decisions. To investigate into the relationship between FPA and AMS, this article undertakes two key tasks. First, using data from the 2017-2021 China Household Finance Survey, the instrumental variable method is employed to identify the impact of FPA on farmers’ adoption of AMS. Second, the study examines why the effect of FPA on AMS development shifts over time, focusing on labor opportunity costs and market-oriented land transfers.The estimated results indicate that FPA significantly reduces both the adoption rate of AMS among farmers and the proportion of land area managed using AMS. Mechanism analysis reveals that rising opportunity costs of agricultural labor and the development of market-oriented land transfers exacerbate the inhibitory effect of FPA on AMS adoption. Further analysis suggests that improvements in the rural social security system and increased factor marketization intensify the negative correlation between FPA and AMS.The contributions of this article are twofold. First, it is the first to explore the inherent logic of how FPA suppresses farmers’ adoption of AMS. Internationally, scholars have primarily focused on how factors such as AMS prices, rural-urban migration, opportunity costs of agricultural labor, and the aging rural population motivate farmers to adopt AMS. However, there has been little exploration into the alternative behavioral choices induced by FPA and their inhibitory effects on AMS adoption. Particularly in the context of global population aging and the intensification of FPA, the development of AMS plays a crucial role in maintaining sustainable agricultural development, ensuring food security, and improving labor productivity. Yet, the combined effects of global population aging and FPA could exacerbate food shortages in developing countries. Second, this article offers valuable insights for future policy-making related to the development of the AMS market and timely responses to changes in market demand. As the Chinese government focuses on promoting AMS development, the evolving characteristics and demands of AMS market participants will impose new requirements on market supply, playing a critical role in shaping the supply mechanisms of the AMS market.The policy implications of this article are threefold. First, optimizing the implementation mechanisms of agricultural and operator subsidies is crucial to improving the labor productivity of active agricultural operators. Second, efforts should be made to accelerate the establishment of a reasonable land rent formation mechanism to prevent excessive marketization or inflated land transfer pricing, which could cause farmers to exit agricultural production prematurely and destabilize the AMS market and agricultural management system. Third, it is essential to expedite plans to enhance the quality of domestic agricultural machinery and establish regional multi-center specialized AMS organizations to mitigate the impacts of FPA.
|
|
Received: 27 May 2024
|
|
|
|
1 罗必良：《论服务规模经营——从纵向分工到横向及连片专业化》，《中国农村经济》2017年第11期，第2-16页。
2 罗必良：《中国农业现代化的战略定位》，《中国农村经济》2022年第12期，第20-24页。
3 罗必良：《中国农业现代化：时代背景、目标定位与策略选择》，《国家现代化建设研究》2023年第1期，第65-78页。
4 钟甫宁、陆五一、徐志刚：《农村劳动力外出务工不利于粮食生产吗？——对农户要素替代与种植结构调整行为及约束条件的解析》，《中国农村经济》2016年第7期，第36-47页。
5 杨进、钟甫宁、陈志钢等：《农村劳动力价格、人口结构变化对粮食种植结构的影响》，《管理世界》2016年第1期，第78-87页。
6 郑旭媛、徐志刚：《资源禀赋约束、要素替代与诱致性技术变迁——以中国粮食生产的机械化为例》，《经济学（季刊）》2017年第1期，第45-66页。
7 郑旭媛、林庆林、周凌晨诺：《中国农业“双规模”经营方式创新、绩效及其外溢效应分析》，《中国农村经济》2022年第7期，第103-123页。
8 仇童伟：《中国农机服务发展研究》，北京：中国农业出版社，2022年。
9 Luo B.， “40-year reform of farmland institution in China： target， effort and the future，” China Agricultural Economic Review， Vol. 10， No. 1 （2018）， pp. 16-35.
10 Qiu T.， Choy B. & Li S. et al.， “Does land renting-in reduce grain production？ evidence from rural China，” Land Use Policy， Vol. 90 （2020）， https：//doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104311.
11 Zhang T.， “The logic of grain planting： a framework of farmland property right， resource allocation， and division of labor，” China Agricultural Economic Review， Vol. 12， No. 1 （2020）， pp. 173-175.
12 Zou B.， Mishra A. & Luo B.， “Aging population， farm succession， and farmland usage： evidence from rural China，” Land Use Policy， Vol. 77 （2018）， pp. 437-445.
13 Jiang Y.， Zhao T. & Zheng H.， “Population aging and its effects on the gap of urban public health insurance in China，” China Economic Review， Vol. 68 （2021）， https：//doi.org/10.1016/j.chieco.2021.101646.
14 仇童伟、彭嫦燕：《农业人口老龄化对农地配置与种粮决策的影响：来自中国家庭金融调查的证据》，《中国农村观察》2023年第4期，第129-150页。
15 Sims B. & Kienzle J.， “Making mechanization accessible to smallholder farmers in Sub-Saharan Africa，” Environments， Vol. 3， No. 2 （2016）， pp. 1-18.
16 Zhang X.， Yang J. & Reardon T.， “Mechanization outsourcing clusters and division of labor in Chinese agriculture，” China Economic Review， Vol. 43 （2017）， pp. 184-195.
17 Yi Q.， Chen M. Y. & Sheng Y. et al.， “Mechanization services， farm productivity and institutional innovation in China，” China Agricultural Economic Review， Vol. 11， No. 3 （2019）， pp. 536-554.
18 Yang J.， Huang Z. & Zhang X. et al.， “The rapid rise of cross-regional agricultural mechanization services in China，” American Journal of Agricultural Economics， Vol. 95， No. 5 （2013）， pp. 1245-1251.
19 Houssou N.， Diao X. & Cossar F. et al.， “Agricultural mechanization in Ghana： is specified agricultural mechanization service provision a viable business model？” American Journal of Agricultural Economics， Vol. 95， No. 5 （2013）， pp. 1237-1244.
20 Diao X.， Cossar F. & Houssou N. et al.， “Mechanization in Ghana： emerging demand， and the search for alternative supply models，” Food Policy， Vol. 48 （2014）， pp. 168-181.
21 胡雪枝、钟甫宁：《农村人口老龄化对粮食生产的影响——基于农村固定观察点数据的分析》，《中国农村经济》2012年第7期，第29-39页。
22 胡雪枝、钟甫宁：《人口老龄化对种植业生产的影响——基于小麦和棉花作物分析》，《农业经济问题》2013年第2期，第36-43，110页。
23 Qiu T. & Luo B.， “Do small farms prefer agricultural mechanization services？ evidence from wheat production in China，” Applied Economics， Vol. 53， No. 26 （2021）， pp. 2962-2973.
24 仇童伟、何勤英、罗必良：《谁更能从农机服务中获益——基于小麦产出率的分析》，《农业技术经济》2021年第9期，第4-15页。
25 Foster A. D. & Rosenzweig M. R.， “Are there too many farms in the world？ labor-market transaction costs， machine capacities and optimal farm sizes，” Journal of Political Economy， Vol. 130， No. 3 （2022）， pp. 636-680.
26 Qiu T.， Shi X. & He Q. et al.， “The paradox of developing agricultural mechanization services in China： supporting or kicking out smallholder farmers，” China Economic Review， Vol. 69 （2021）， https：//doi.org/10.1016/j.chieco.2021.101680.
27 Qiu T.， Choy B. & Li Y. et al.， “Farmers’ exit from land operation in rural China： does the price of agricultural mechanization services matter？” China & World Economy， Vol. 29， No. 2 （2021）， pp. 99-122.
28 Wang X.， Huang J. & Rozelle S.， “Off-farm employment and agricultural specialization in China，” China Economic Review， Vol. 42 （2017）， pp. 155-165.
29 Wang X.， Yamauchi F. & Otsuka K. et al.， “Wage growth， landholding and mechanization in Chinese agriculture，” World Development， Vol. 86 （2016）， pp. 30-45.
30 钱忠好：《非农就业是否必然导致农地流转——基于家庭内部分工的理论分析及其对中国农户兼业化的解释》，《中国农村经济》2008年第10期，第13-21页。
31 罗必良、仇童伟、张露等：《种粮的逻辑——“农地产权—要素配置—农业分工”的解释框架》，北京：中国农业出版社，2018年。
32 仇童伟：《中国农地流转市场转型逻辑》，北京：科学出版社，2022年。
33 Yan J.， Yang Z. & Li Z. et al.， “Drivers of cropland abandonment in mountainous areas： a household decision model on farming scale in southwest China，” Land Use Policy， Vol. 57 （2016）， pp. 459-469.
34 Liu Y.， “Introduction to land use and rural sustainability in China，” Land Use Policy， Vol. 74 （2018）， pp. 1-4.
35 Xu D.， Deng X. & Guo S. et al.， “Labor migration and farmland abandonment in rural China： empirical results and policy implications，” Journal of Environment Management， Vol. 232 （2019）， pp. 738-750.
36 仇童伟：《农地流转市场化中的耕地抛荒》，《华南农业大学学报（社会科学版）》2022年第3期，第37-48页。
37 Sheng Y.， Ding J. & Huang J.， “The relationship between farm sizes and productivity in agriculture： evidence from northern China，” American Journal of Agricultural Economics， Vol. 101， No. 3 （2019）， pp. 790-806.
38 仇童伟、罗必良：《流转“差序格局”撕裂与农地非粮化：基于中国29省调查的证据》，《管理世界》2022年第9期，第96-113页。
39 Feng S.， Heerink N. & Ruben R. et al.， “Land rental market， off-farm employment and agricultural production in southeast China： a plot-level case study，” China Economic Review， Vol. 21 （2010）， pp. 598-606.
40 Ma X.， Heerink N. & Feng S. et al.， “Farmland tenure in China： comparing legal， actual and perceived security，” Land Use Policy， Vol. 42 （2015）， pp. 293-306.
41 Ma X.， “Does tenure security matter？ rural household responses to land tenure reforms in northwest China，” https：//edepot.wur.nl/281615， 2024-05-27.
42 Zhu J.， Jin S. & Tang Z. et al.， “The effect of pension income on land transfers： evidence from rural China，” Economic Development and Cultural Change， Vol. 71， No. 1 （2022）， pp. 333-371.
43 Rao F.， Spoor M. & Ma X. et al.， “Land tenure （in）security and crop-tree intercropping in rural Xinjiang， China，” Land Use Policy， Vol. 50 （2016）， pp. 102-114.
44 Hong W.， Luo B. & Hu X.， “Land titling， land reallocation experience， and investment incentives： evidence from rural China，” Land Use Policy， Vol. 90 （2020）， https：//doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104271.
45 Ma S. & Mu R.， “Forced off the farm？ farmers’ labor allocation response to land requisition in China，” World Development， Vol. 132 （2020）， https：//doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.104980.
46 仇童伟、罗必良、何勤英：《农地流转市场转型：理论与证据——基于对农地流转对象与农地租金关系的分析》，《中国农村观察》2019年第4期，第128-144页。
47 王小鲁、胡李鹏、樊纲：《中国分省份市场化指数报告》，北京：社会科学文献出版社，2021年。 |
|
|
|
2024, Vol. 54 
