|
|
|
| The Pattern and Mechanism of Party Building for Non-public Enterprises to Promote Common Prosperity |
| Yao Mingming1,2 |
1.School of Marxism, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China
2.Research Center for Marxism Theory Innovation and Communication, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China |
|
|
|
|
Abstract This article starts from how institutional foundation and specific practices of Party building lead non-public enterprises to promote common prosperity. Based on the “legitimacy motives and endogenous motives” of establishing Party organizations in non-public enterprises and the “development prerequisites and core of sharing” to achieve common prosperity, the pattern of how Party building leads non-public enterprises to promote common prosperity is divided into market efficiency, market novelty, institutional efficiency, and institutional novelty from the perspective of driving entities of Party building and the results-oriented approach to common prosperity. Investigating the mechanism of how Party building leads non-public enterprises to promote common prosperity is conducive to the transformation from macro goals to micro actions, providing a clear direction for the substantial role of Party building in non-public enterprises and offering action plans for non-public enterprises to promote common prosperity. Firstly, Party organizations in non-public enterprises continuously innovate in governance integration, organizational alliances, and responsibility fulfillment, which will be transformed into the substantive roles of enterprise development. Secondly, Party organizations in non-public enterprises achieve the leadership effectiveness of Party building by constructing paradigm identity, optimizing enterprise networks, and acquiring resource capabilities, promoting enterprise growth while enabling participation in inclusive development and sharing interests with more stakeholders. Lastly, the leadership effectiveness of Party building in non-public enterprises serves as a driving force in various development agendas for common prosperity, including promoting high-quality economic development, facilitating regional coordinated development, and realizing social harmony and development.The significance of this article lies in enhancing the theoretical research on Party organizations and the theoretical connotation of Party building in non-public enterprises at the theoretical level, and enriching the research on common prosperity from the perspectives of Party building and non-public enterprises. At the practical level, it provides practical guidance for further promoting the comprehensive and strict governance of the Party within non-public enterprises and better leveraging the leadership role of Party building in such enterprises. Additionally, it offers reference and guidance for concrete practices in promoting common prosperity comprehensively.The innovation of this article primarily lies in three aspects. Firstly, this article addresses the conflict between the Western theoretical notion of “maximizing shareholder interests in enterprises” and the active involvement of non-public enterprises in the practice of promoting common prosperity. It introduces a pattern on how Party building leads non-public own enterprises to promote common prosperity based on the driving entities of Party building and the results-oriented approach to common prosperity, providing new ideas and evidence for enhancing Party building in non-public enterprises under the context of comprehensive and strict governance of the Party. Secondly, non-public enterprises have made significant contributions to creating more wealth and increasing social affluence, thereby becoming vital forces in promoting common prosperity. This article innovatively combines institutional analysis with practical review to clarify how the institutional foundation and specific practices of Party building lead non-public enterprises to promote common prosperity. Thirdly, it elucidates the previously opaque mechanism by which Party building leads non-public enterprises to promote common prosperity, suggesting that Party building is the driving force for non-public enterprises to participate in common prosperity initiatives. By enriching research on common prosperity from the perspective of Party building, this article provides a methodological pathway for Party organizations to play a substantive role in non-public enterprises.
|
|
Received: 13 March 2023
|
|
|
|
1 江亚洲、郁建兴：《第三次分配推动共同富裕的作用与机制》，《浙江社会科学》2021年第9期，第76-83，157-158页。
2 李实：《共同富裕的目标和实现路径选择》，《经济研究》2021年11期，第4-13页。
3 习近平：《扎实推动共同富裕》，《求是》2021年第20期，第4-8页。
4 李实、陈宗胜、史晋川等：《“共同富裕”主题笔谈》，《浙江大学学报（人文社会科学版）》2022年第1期，第6-21页。
5 习近平：《以更大力度扎实做好非公有制企业党的建设工作》，《党建研究》2012年第4期，第4-5页。
6 何轩、马骏：《党建也是生产力——民营企业党组织建设的机制与效果研究》，《社会学研究》2018年第3期，第1-24，242页。
7 李实、朱梦冰：《推进收入分配制度改革 促进共同富裕实现》，《管理世界》2022年第1期，第52-62，76页。
8 刘培林、钱滔、黄先海等：《共同富裕的内涵、实现路径与测度方法》，《管理世界》2021年第8期，第117-129页。
9 中共中央党史和文献研究院编：《习近平扶贫论述摘编》，北京：中央文献出版社，2018年。
10 柏路：《精神生活共同富裕的时代意涵与价值遵循》，《马克思主义研究》2022年第2期，第64-75，156页。
11 郁建兴、任杰：《共同富裕的理论内涵与政策议程》，《政治学研究》2021年3期，第13-25，159-160页。
12 Barney J.， “Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage，” Journal of Management， Vol. 17， No. 1 （1991）， pp. 99-120.
13 习近平：《毫不动摇坚持我国基本经济制度 推动各种所有制经济健康发展》，2016年3月9日，https：//www.gov.cn/xinwen/2016-03/09/content_5051083.htm？eqid=d06 8c4fa000bec1c00000006645e1950，2024年3月15日。
14 陈志钢、茅锐、张云飞：《城乡融合发展与共同富裕：内涵、国际经验与实现路径》，《浙江大学学报（人文社会科学版）》2022年第7期，第68-78页。
15 董雪兵、缪彬彬、倪好：《以高质量区域协调发展持续推动共同富裕》，《浙江大学学报（人文社会科学版）》2022年第5期，第104-112页。
16 Teece D. & Pisano G.， “The dynamic capabilities of firms： an introduction，” Industrial and Corporate Change， Vol. 3， No. 3 （1994）， pp. 537-556.
17 Wu L. Y.， “Entrepreneurial resources， dynamic capabilities and start-up performance of Taiwan’s high-tech firms，” Journal of Business Research， Vol. 60， No. 5 （2007）， pp. 549-555.
18 李实、杨一心：《面向共同富裕的基本公共服务均等化：行动逻辑与路径选择》，《中国工业经济》2022年第2期，第27-41页。
19 厉以宁、黄奇帆、刘世锦等：《共同富裕：科学内涵与实现路径》，北京：中信出版社，2021年。 |
|
|
|
2024, Vol. 54 
