研发费用加计扣除对创新方向的影响

doi:10.3785/j.issn.1008-942X.CN33-6000/C.2023.02.244

Abstract
Figure/Table
References
Related Citation (2)

Download: PDF (931 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract After over 40 years of development through reform and opening up, China’s economy has transitioned from high-speed growth to high-quality development. However, its innovation capability has not yet fully met the requirements of achieving high-quality economic development. To shape the nation’s competitive advantage, enhancing enterprises’ independent innovation capacity is imperative. The “Outline of the 14th Five-Year Plan (2021-2025) for National Economic and Social Development and the Long-Range Objectives Through the Year 2035” proposes forward-looking strategies for future industries. Pioneering innovative directions and achieving new technological breakthroughs provide important scientific and technological support for opening up new areas and tracks, shaping new impetus and new advantages, and cultivating future industries.The Fifth Plenary Session of the 19th Central Committee of the Communist Party of China explicitly encourages enterprises to increase their research and development (R&D) investment, implementing tax incentives for basic research. The policy of the super-deduction of R&D expenses plays a central role in China’s tax policy system to stimulate corporate innovation. It is written into the important guiding documents such as the “National Innovation-driven Development Strategy Outline” and the “13th Five-Year National Science and Technology Innovation Plan”. Evaluating whether this policy can promote enterprises to explore new innovative directions, enhance their independent innovation capabilities, maintain sustainable innovation, is of great significance to improving the efficacy of the national innovation system, achieving scientific and technological self-reliance and self-improvement, and even realizing the goal of building a socialist modernized strong nation.Existing literature has mainly focused on the quantity of innovation while neglecting the crucial role of innovation direction. This study compiles data on the tax incentives for the super-deduction of R&D expenses enjoyed by companies listed on the Shanghai and Shenzhen stock exchanges between 2014 and 2018. Using this data, the actual beneficiaries of the super-deduction of R&D expenses policy are effectively identified. Additionally, following the classification methods of Ahuja & Morris (2001), and referencing the “International Patent Classification (2016)” (IPC classification) and the “International Classification for Industrial Designs (8th edition)” (Locarno classification), the patents applied by listed companies are summarized and classified by “department, major category, and minor category” to determine whether enterprises have ventured into new innovative directions. The study employs the Heckman two-step model to examine the policy’s effects.The research findings indicate (1) the policy effectively encourages enterprises to explore new innovative directions and engage in high-quality innovation activities in these new areas; (2) the increase in cash flow support and net asset return brought about by this policy is a significant pathway for promoting enterprises to explore new directions; (3) the incentive effects of this policy on exploring innovative directions in strategic emerging industries are more pronounced. The study suggests further intensifying incentives, implementing policies to support “bottleneck technologies” and other strategically important technological fields, and increasing support for strategic emerging industries. Moreover, greater post-support should be provided to enterprises that achieve groundbreaking innovation breakthrough.

Key words： super-deduction of R&D expenses direction of innovation continuous innovation preferential tax

Received: 24 February 2023

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	Qian Tao
	Zhan Yutao
	Pan Shiyuan

Cite this article:

Qian Tao,Zhan Yutao,Pan Shiyuan. The Impact of Super-deduction of R&D Expenses on Innovation Direction: Evidences from Listed Companies in Chinese Manufacturing Industry[J]. JOURNAL OF ZHEJIANG UNIVERSITY, 2023, 53(12): 131-150.

URL:

https://www.zjujournals.com/soc/EN/10.3785/j.issn.1008-942X.CN33-6000/C.2023.02.244 OR https://www.zjujournals.com/soc/EN/Y2023/V53/I12/131

1 Kirchhoff B.， “Entrepreneurship’s contribution to economics，” Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice， Vol. 16， No. 2 （1991）， pp. 93-112.
2 Burgelman R.， “A process model of internal corporate venturing in the diversified major firm，” Administrative Science Quarterly， Vol. 28， No. 1 （1983）， pp. 223-244.
3 王军：《激励创新的企业所得税优惠政策导向与趋势——基于研发费用加计扣除政策修订的视角》，《国际经济合作》2018年第9期，第11-15页。
4 Romer P. M.， “Endogenous technological change，” Journal of Political Economy， Vol. 98， No. 5 （1990）， pp. 71-102.
5 Moser P. & Rhode P. W.， “Did plant patents create the American rose？” in Lerner J. & Stern S. （eds.）， The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity Revisited， Chicago： University of Chicago Press， 2012， pp. 413-438.
6 Acemoglu D.， “Diversity and technological progress，” in Lerner J. & Stern S. （eds.）， The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity Revisited， Chicago： University of Chicago Press， 2012， pp. 319-356.
7 Furman J. F. & Teodoridis F.， “The cost of research tools and the direction： evidence from computer science and electrical engineering，” https：//doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3060599， 2023-02-24.
8 Hohberger J.， Almeida P. & Parada P.， “The direction of firm innovation： the contrasting roles of strategic alliances and individual scientific collaborations，” Research Policy， Vol. 44， No. 8 （2015）， pp. 1473-1487.
9 Mokyr J.， The Gifts of Athena： Historical Origins of the Knowledge Economy， Princeton： Princeton University Press， 2002.
10 Furman J. & Stern S.， “Climbing a top the shoulders of giants： the impact of institutions on cumulative knowledge production，” American Economic Review， Vol. 101， No. 5 （2011）， pp. 1933-1963.
11 Aghion P.， Askenazy P. & Berman N.， “Credit constraints and the cyclicality of R&D investment： evidence from France，” Journal of the European Economic Association， Vol. 10， No. 5 （2012）， pp. 1001-1024.
12 Cappelen A.， Raknerud A. & Rybalka M.， “The effects of R&D tax credits on patenting and innovations，” Research Policy， Vol. 41， No. 2 （2012）， pp. 334-345.
13 Balsmeier B.， Kurakina M. & Fleming L.， “R&D tax credits： mechanisms of private and public value，” https：//siepr.stanford.edu/system/files/lee_flemming_siepr.pdf， 2023-02-24.
14 Ahuja G. & Lampert C. M.， “Entrepreneurship in the large corporation： a longitudinal in a study of how established firms create breakthrough inventions，” Strategic Management Journal， Vol. 22， No. 6-7 （2001）， pp. 521-543.
15 Hoang T. X.， Pham C. S. & Ulubasoglu M. A.， “Non-farm activity， household expenditure， and poverty reduction in rural Vietnam： 2002-2008，” World Development， Vol. 64 （2014）， pp. 554-568.
16 Lewbel A.， “Using heteroscedasticity to identify and estimate mismeasured and endogenous regressor models，” Journal of Business & Economic Statistics， Vol. 30， No. 1 （2012）， pp. 67-80.
17 Arrow K. J.， “Economic welfare and the allocation of resources for invention，” in National Bureau of Economic Research （ed.）， The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity， Princeton： Princeton University Press， 1962， pp. 609-626.
18 Hall B. H. & Reenen J. V.， “How effective are fiscal incentives for R&D？ a review of the evidence，” Research Policy， Vol. 29， No. 4-5 （2000）， pp. 449-469.
19 Dechezleprêtre A.， Eini? E. & Martin R. et al.， “Do tax incentives for research increase firm innovation？ an RD design for R&D，” http：//www.nber.org/papers/w22405.pdf， 2023-02-24.
20 Akcigit U.， Grigsby J. & Nicholas T. et al.， “Taxation and innovation in the 20th century，” https：//scholar.harvard.edu/files/stantcheva/files/taxation_20th_century.pdf， 2023-02-24.
21 Cai J.， Chen Y. & Wang X.， “The impact of corporate taxes on firm innovation： evidence from the corporate tax collection in China，” https：//www.nber.org/papers/w25146， 2023-02-24.
22 任海云、宋伟宸：《企业异质性因素、研发费用加计扣除与R&D投入》，《科学学研究》2017年第8期，第1232-1239页。
23 李新、汤恒运、陶东杰等：《研发费用加计扣除政策对企业研发投入的影响研究——来自中国上市公司的证据》，《宏观经济研究》2019年第8期，第81-93页。
24 Howe J. D. & McFetridge D. G.， “The determinants of R&D expenditures，” Canadian Journal of Economics， Vol. 9， No. 1 （1976）， pp. 16-21.
25 吉云、于雯、徐正：《经济政策不确定性会阻碍企业创新吗？——企业家风险容忍度的调节效应》， https：//doi.org/10.26914/c.cnkihy.2020.000326， 2023-02-24.
26 Bernanke B. S.， “Irreversibility， uncertainty， and cyclical investment，” https：//doi.org/10.3386/w0502， 2023-02-24.
27 Galasso A. & Simcoe T. S.， “CEO overconfidence and innovation，” Management Science， Vol. 57， No. 8 （2011）， pp. 1469-1484．
28 国家发展和改革委员会编：《〈中共中央关于制定国民经济和社会发展第十四个五年规划和二○三五年远景目标的建议〉辅导读本》，北京：人民出版社，2020年。
29 March J.， “Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning，” Organization Science， Vol. 2， No. 1 （1991）， pp. 71-87.
30 Levinthal D. A. & March J. G.， “The myopia of learning，” Strategic Management Journal， Vol. 52， No. 14 （1993）， pp. 95-112.
31 Cohen W. & Klepper S.， “Firm size and the nature of innovation within industries： the case of process and product R&D，” Review of Economic and Statistics， Vol. 78， No. 2 （1996）， pp. 232-243.
32 国家统计局社会科技和文化产业统计司、科学技术部战略规划司编：《中国科技统计年鉴（2022）》，北京：中国统计出版社，2022年。
33 Chen Z.， Liu Z. & Carlos J. et al.， “Notching R&D investment with corporate income tax cuts in China，” American Economic Review， Vol. 111， No. 7 （2021）， pp. 2065-2100.
34 龙小宁、王俊：《中国专利激增的动因及其质量效应》，《世界经济》2015年第6期，第115-142页。
35 黎文靖、郑曼妮：《实质性创新还是策略性创新？——宏观产业政策对微观企业创新的影响》，《经济研究》2016年第4期，第60-73页。
36 张立超、刘怡君：《技术轨道的跃迁与技术创新的演化发展》，《科学学研究》2015年第1期，第137-145页。
37 周煊、程立茹、王皓：《技术创新水平越高企业财务绩效越好吗？——基于16年中国制药上市公司专利申请数据的实证研究》，《金融研究》2012年第8期，第116-179页。
38 Tan Y.， Tian X. & Zhang C. X. et al.， “Privatization and innovation： evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in China，” https：//sci-hub.ee/10.2139/ssrn.2433824， 2023-02-24．
39 Dosi G.， Marengo L. & Pasquali C.， “How much should society fuel the greed of innovators？ on the relations between appropriability， opportunities and rates of innovation，” Research Policy， Vol. 35， No. 8 （2006）， pp. 1110-1121．
40 Hall B. H. & Harhoff D.， “Recent research on the economics of patents，” Annual Review of Economics， Vol. 4， No. 1 （2012）， pp. 541-565．
41 杨汝岱、陈斌开、朱诗娥：《基于社会网络视角的农户民间借贷需求行为研究》，《经济研究》2011年第11期，第116-129页。
42 Heckman J. J.， Lalonde R. J. & Smith J. A.， “The economics and econometrics of active labor market programs，” https：//doi.org/10.1016/S1573-4463（99）03012-6， 2023-02-24.
43 Fleming L. & Sorenson O.， “Science as a map in technological search，” Strategic Management Journal， Vol. 25， No. 8-9 （2004）， pp. 909-928.
44 Henderson R. M. & Clark K. B.， “Architectural innovation： the reconfiguration of existing product technologies and the failure of established firms，” Administrative Science Quarterly， Vol. 35， No. 1 （1990）， pp. 9-30.
45 Kogut B. & Zander U.， “Knowledge of the firm combinative capabilities， and the replication of technology，” Organization Science， Vol. 3， No. 3 （1992）， pp. 383-397.
46 Nelson R. & Winter S.， “An evolutionary theory of economic change，” Administrative science Quarterly， Vol. 32， No. 2 （1982）， pp. 315-318.
47 Hoskisson R. A.， Hitt M. A. & Ireland D.， “The effects of acquisitions and restructuring （strategic refocusing） strategies on innovation，” in Krogh G.， Sinatra A. & Singh H. （eds.）， The Management of Corporate Acquisitions， London： Palgrave Macmillan， 1994， pp. 144-169.
48 连燕玲、叶文平、刘依琳：《行业竞争期望与组织战略背离——基于中国制造业上市公司的经验分析》，《管理世界》2019年第8期，第155-172页。
49 杨洋、魏江、罗来军：《谁在利用政府补贴进行创新？——所有制和要素市场扭曲的联合调节效应》，《管理世界》2015年第1期，第75-86页。
50 金玲娣、陈国宏：《企业规模与R&D关系实证研究》，《科研管理》2001年第1期，第51-57页。
51 Baum C. F. & Lewbel A.， “Advice on using heteroskedasticity-based identification，” Stata Journal， Vol. 19， No. 4 （2019）， pp. 757-767.