|
|
A Study of the Rules Governing Ranks and Penalties in the Qin and Han Dynasties |
Huang Hai |
Institute of Law, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, Beijing 100720, China |
|
|
Abstract Reward and punishment were the traditional measures of social governance in ancient China. They were connected by many specific rules. This research aims at the connections between the ranking system and the legal system in the Qin and Han Dynasties. The ranking system in the Qin and Han Dynasties was called Ershidengjue (二十等爵). The ranks in this system were acquired by meritorious military services. It gave various privileges to people who owned certain titles.Specifically, there were four basic categories of the rules in the Qin and Han Dynasties, which were Juejian (爵减), Juemian (爵免), Jueshu (爵赎) and Duojue (夺爵). Juejian, Juemian, and Jueshu were the rules that stipulated how to apply penalty privileges when a titled person violated the law. Duojue was the punishment only for the titled person. The specific meaning of Jueshu is unclear. It should mean transforming severe penalty to redemption based on the title.As is in Han Jiuyi (《汉旧仪》), there is a traditional impression that the penalties included ranking reduction and banishment, but this impression is not always true. There are exceptional cases. Based on “Jiejue Chuzishu Ling” (解爵除赀赎令) in the bamboo slips of Qin Dynasty kept in Yuelu Academy, we know that a title was possibly removed when the penalty was Zishu (赀赎).The penalty privilege rules were based on the Ershidengjue system which was connected with the formation of the centralized governing system. In its development process, the transformation of the military system was the key point. During the Warring States Period, noble private armies gradually disappeared. Almost all the armies of the state were directly controlled by the King. To encourage his soldiers to fight bravely, the King needed a reward systems, a military glory system called Ershidengjue in the Qin State, and it was extended to the Qin and Han Dynasties.
|
Received: 02 November 2022
|
|
|
|
1 彭浩、陈伟、[日]工藤元男编: 《二年律令与奏谳书》,上海:上海古籍出版社,2007年。 2 甘肃简牍保护研究中心等编: 《肩水金关汉简(一)》(下册),上海:中西书局,2011年。 3 马怡、张荣强主编: 《居延新简释校》,天津:天津古籍出版社,2013年。 4 徐世虹: 《西汉末期法制新识——以张勋主守盗案牍为对象》,《历史研究》2018年第5期,第4-20,189页。 5 睡虎地秦墓竹简整理小组编: 《睡虎地秦墓竹简》,北京:文物出版社,1990年。 6 陈松长主编: 《岳麓书院藏秦简》(五),上海;上海辞书出版社,2017年。 7 陈松长主编: 《岳麓书院藏秦简(壹—叁)释文修订本》,上海:上海辞书出版社,2018年。 8 商艳涛: 《西周军事铭文研究》,广州:华南理工大学出版社,2013年。 9 始皇陵秦俑坑考古发掘队: 《秦始皇陵西侧赵背户村秦刑徒墓》,《文物》1982年第3期,第1-11页。 10 中国社会科学院考古研究所编: 《殷周金文集成》,北京:中华书局,2007年。 11 杨伯峻编著: 《春秋左传注》,北京:中华书局,2009年。 12 阎步克: 《波峰与波谷——秦汉魏晋南北朝的政治文明》,北京:北京大学出版社,2017年。 13 陈立: 《白虎通疏证》,吴则虞点校,北京:中华书局,1994年。 14 班固: 《汉书》,北京:中华书局,1962年。 15 司马迁: 《史记》,北京:中华书局,2014年。 16 荀悦、袁宏: 《两汉纪》,张烈点校,北京:中华书局,2017年。 17 孙希旦: 《礼记集解》,沈啸寰、王星贤点校,北京:中华书局,1989年。 18 王利器: 《盐铁论校注》,北京:中华书局,1992年。 19 孙诒让: 《墨子间诂》,孙启治点校,北京:中华书局,2001年。 20 王先慎: 《韩非子集解》,钟哲点校,北京:中华书局,2013年。 21 蒋礼鸿: 《商君书锥指》,北京:中华书局,2014年。 22 王先谦: 《荀子集解》,沈啸寰、王星贤点校,北京:中华书局,1988年。 23 孙星衍等辑: 《汉官六种》,周天游点校,北京:中华书局,1990年。 |
|
|
|