|
|
|
| The Mechanism of New Development Pattern in Promoting High-quality Economic Development: From the Perspective of Infra-marginal Analysis |
| Zhang Ribo |
| School of Economics, Party School of Zhejiang Provincial Committee of the Communist Party of China, Hangzhou 311121, China |
|
|
|
|
Abstract China’s new development paradigm features dual circulation, in which both domestic market and overseas one reinforces each other, with the domestic one as the mainstay. This is an important economic development path and strategy for China in the new stage of development. This paper focuses on the characteristics of China’s domestic circulation from the perspective of China’s domestic unified large market construction. The construction of a national unified big market involves six areas, namely, “unified basic market institutions and rules, high standard connected market facilities, unified factor and resource markets, unified commodity and service markets, unified market supervision and fairness, and regulation of improper market competition and market intervention”. The unifications involved in these fields were previously limited to small areas and were public goods in small scope. The essence of the construction of the domestic unified market is to break down the regional barriers and eliminate the administrative economy through top-level design so that regional public goods can be transformed into generalized national public goods. The domestic circulation has two functions: improving transaction efficiency and production efficiency. This paper focuses on the following question: what impacts will these two functions have on China’s internal and external circulation?In this paper, the new development paradigm, especially the two functions， is viewed from the perspective of the division of labor. The two functions of dual circulation are analyzed endogenously within the framework of ultra-marginal analysis. A series of boundary conditions must be satisfied for the dual circulation structure to be the optimal structure among many structures of divisions of labor. This paper draws the following conclusions: First, any kind of division of labor structure has its critical conditions to be satisfied. There is no optimal division of labor structure in every case. For a certain division of labor structure to become the socially optimal division of labor structure, its absolute transaction efficiency needs to have an overwhelming advantage over the compound absolute transaction efficiency under other structures, or its relative transaction efficiency advantage exceeds the relative productivity gap with other structures. Second, traditional internal circulation can optimize the allocation of labor factors, reconstruct the inter-regional industrial division of labor, and increase per capita income. When domestic regions open to each other, domestic commodity market integration and labor market integration will emerge. Each product achieves domestic survival of the fittest according to the productivity level. In accordance with comparative advantages, each region divides its labor in production and trades at the highest productivity level. Micro entities increase their income by choosing high-productivity industries that suit them. Third, with the domestic market as the mainstay, the construction of a national unified large market has obvious effects on promoting economic development of high-quality. The role of domestic large circulation is to improve transaction efficiency and production efficiency, increase income, and promote the transformation of employment structure and industrial structure. As a high-level division of labor structure, the domestic cycle is the result of the microcosmic subject weighing the cost and benefit of the domestic great cycle. In the process of building a unified domestic market, the government is supposed to make intensive use of the limited tax revenue so as to provide better public services. Only in this way can we improve the transaction efficiency and production efficiency, promote the optimization of the social division of labor structure, and realize the jump from the traditional internal circulation to the high level of internal circulation. Fourth, the action of the external circulation should be grouped into normal and abnormal situations. The function of normal external circulation is to optimize the allocation of domestic labor factors and reduce the technological gap with developed countries. The function of abnormal external circulation is also manifested as a forcing internal system reform, so as to make up for the loss of external trade distortion through the dividend of reform.
|
|
Received: 25 October 2022
|
|
|
|
1 江小涓、孟丽君： 《内循环为主、外循环赋能与更高水平双循环》，《管理世界》2021年第1期，第1-19页。
2 郭晴： 《“双循环”新发展格局的现实逻辑与实现路径》，《求索》2020年第6期，第100-107页。
3 董志勇、李成明： 《国内国际双循环新发展格局：历史溯源、逻辑阐释与政策导向》，《中共中央党校（国家行政学院）学报》2020年第5期，第47-55页。
4 罗志恒、马家进： 《加快建设全国统一大市场 畅通国内大循环》，《金融博览》2022年第6期，第33-35页。
5 刘志彪、孔令池： 《从分割走向整合：推进国内统一大市场建设的阻力与对策》，《中国工业经济》2021年第8期，第20-36页。
6 王一鸣： 《百年大变局、高质量发展与构建新发展格局》，《管理世界》2020年第12期，第1-13页。
7 孙久文、张皓： 《新发展格局下中国区域差距演变与协调发展研究》，《经济学家》2021年第7期，第63-72页。
8 沈坤荣、赵倩： 《以双循环新发展格局推动“十四五”时期经济高质量发展》，《经济纵横》2020年第10期，第18-25页。
9 彭小兵、韦冬萍： 《“双循环”新发展格局的缘起、基础和治理》，《重庆大学学报（社会科学版）》2020年第6期，第35-43页。
10 高培勇： 《构建新发展格局：在统筹发展和安全中前行》，《经济研究》2021年第3期，第4-13页。
11 赵蓉、赵立祥、苏映雪： 《全球价值链嵌入、区域融合发展与制造业产业升级》，《南方经济》2020年第10期，第1-19页。
12 黄群慧： 《新发展格局的理论逻辑、战略内涵与政策体系——基于经济现代化的视角》，《经济研究》2021年第4期，第4-23页。
13 黄群慧、倪红福： 《中国经济国内国际双循环的测度分析——兼论新发展格局的本质特征》，《管理世界》2021年第12期，第40-58页。
14 逄锦聚： 《深化理解加快构建新发展格局》，《经济学动态》2020年第10期，第3-11页。
15 葛扬、尹紫翔： 《我国构建“双循环”新发展格局的理论分析》，《经济问题》2021年第4期，第1-6页。
16 裴长洪、刘洪愧： 《构建新发展格局科学内涵研究》，《中国工业经济》2020年第6期，第5-22页。
17 洪银兴、杨玉珍： 《构建新发展格局的路径研究》，《经济学家》2021年第3期，第5-14页。
18 中共中央宣传部、国家发展和改革委员会编： 《习近平经济思想学习纲要》，北京：人民出版社、学习出版社，2022年。
19 美］詹姆斯·M.布坎南： 《公共物品的需求与供给》，马珺译，上海：上海人民出版社，2017年。
20 美］史蒂文·N.杜尔劳夫、劳伦斯·E.布卢姆主编： 《新帕尔格雷夫经济学大辞典》（第二版），北京：经济科学出版社，2016年。
21 张日波： 《报酬递增思想的演进：以马歇尔为中心的考察》，杭州：浙江大学出版社，2015年。
22 英］亚当·斯密： 《国民财富的性质和原因的研究》，郭大力、王亚南译，北京：商务印书馆，2009年。
23 杨小凯： 《经济学原理》，北京：中国社会科学出版社，1998年。
24 Wen M.， “Infrastructure and evolution in division of labor，” Review of Development Economics， Vol. 1， No. 2 （1997）， pp. 191-206.
25 Chu C. Y. C. & Tsai Y. C.， “Productivity， investment in infrastructure and population size，” in Arrow K. J.， Ng Y. K. & Yang X. （eds.）， Increasing Returns and Economic Analysis， London： Palgrave Macmillan， 1998， pp. 90-107.
26 Zhang J.， “Policy analysis in a dynamic model with endogenous specialization，” in Arrow K. J.， Ng Y. K. & Yang X. （eds.）， Increasing Returns and Economic Analysis， London： Palgrave Macmillan， 1998， pp. 205-215.
27 Olson M.， The Logic of Collective Action， Cambridge： Harvard University Press， 1965.
28 Yao S.， “Walrasian equilibrium computation， network formation， and the Wen Theorem，” Review of Development Economics， Vol. 6， No. 3 （2002）， pp. 415-427. |
|
|
|
2023, Vol. 53 
