|
|
|
| How Capital Tames Labor Power: A Foucaultian Powerism Interpretation of Marx’s Capital |
| Wu Yile1, Chen Jiaming2 |
1.School of Marxism, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China
2.School of Humanities, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China |
|
|
|
|
Abstract The relationship between capital and power has long been studied in the academia. However, there are still several unanswered questions about capital power in Marx’s Capital. These include what factors enable capital to gain power, why workers submit to labor control, the role of capital power outside productive labor, how capital subdues workers’ bodies and minds, how it punishes disobedient workers, and the extent to which capital power is successful. To answer these questions, Foucault’s theory of power is an important reference for Marx’s theory of capital power. Foucault’s interpretation of Marx’s Capital emphasizes the power perspective, deepens our understanding of the capitalist mode of production, and helps us explore the key issue of “how capital tames labor” in Marx’s theory of capital power.Foucault’s interpretation of Marx has three key propositions. First, collaborative labor is essential for capital to obtain power. The production mode of collective force and collaborative labor force workers to accept the control of capital power, enabling the bourgeoisie to gain power. The power of capital to dominate labor is continually increasing, and the dependence of workers on capital is also deepening. Second, discipline is the technical system for capital power to obtain and tame the body. The capitalist mode of production has created new demands that can be achieved by discipline. According to Marx, capital relies on power to regulate and control the production of labour. Foucault introduced the term “discipline” to explain how this power is manifested and implemented, revealing how it is embedded in the society. The disciplinary society described by Foucault is present in Marx’s capitalist society. Through a series of technologies, the bourgeoisie can directly or indirectly control the body and actions of workers, ultimately serving the purpose of capital accumulation. Third, capital power pursues the sustained and stable supply of labor. Power relies on the policy of industrial reserve forces to accumulate a continuous stream of labor force, to achieve comprehensive supervision of people, eliminate interference with capitalist production through the punishment of illegal activities. By regulating population and life, capital power can be successfully implemented and continued.Foucault’s criticism of capital power is based on the achievements of Marxist political economy. By depicting the changes in power technology forms and observing the changes in the relationship between individuals and power in detail, Foucault’s interpretation of power broadens our understanding of the power theory in Capital. It is important to understand the differences between Foucault and Marx’s approaches. Foucault’s study is characterized by “problematization”. He is skilled at identifying problems but not so much at addressing them. Foucault avoids holistic thinking and instead focuses on specific object domains to gain insight into the individual’s experience in power relations. He ultimately turns to a survival aesthetic of “care of the self”. On the other hand, Marx examines the effectiveness of capital power from a global perspective of production system and social class. Starting from the materialist view of history, Marx believes that human activities can consciously transform social structures. He points out the path of confronting and transcending alienation. Through an examination of the foundational ideas behind Marx’s views on capital power and Foucault’s interpretation of them, we can gain a deeper understanding of the fundamental characteristics and operational dynamics of capital power. Over time, capital power has taken on various new forms, including financial power, technological power, algorithmic power, and more. These are various manifestations of capital power but have not deviated from or changed the essential attributes of capital power. We must explore ways to avoid turning humans into machines in the form of power control, which requires good institutional design. It is also the fundamental significance of studying the issue of capital power.
|
|
Received: 22 September 2022
|
|
|
|
1 德］马克思： 《卡·马克思经济学手稿（1857—1858）（手稿前半部分）》，见中共中央马克思恩格斯列宁斯大林著作编译局编译： 《马克思恩格斯全集》第30卷，北京：人民出版社，1995年。
2 陈嘉明： 《现代性与后现代性十五讲》，北京：北京大学出版社，2006年。
3 德］马克思： 《资本论》第一卷，见中共中央马克思恩格斯列宁斯大林著作编译局编译： 《马克思恩格斯文集》第5卷，北京：人民出版社，2009年。
4 意］朱里奥·巴勒莫： 《经济学与权力：马克思主义批判观点》，范静译，上海：上海财经大学出版社，2021年。
5 法］米歇尔·福柯： 《规训与惩罚》，刘北成、杨远婴译，北京：生活·读书·新知三联书店，2012年。
6 意］奈格里： 《〈大纲〉：超越马克思的马克思》，张梧、孟丹、王巍译，北京：北京师范大学出版社，2011年。
7 德］马克思： 《雇佣劳动与资本》，见中共中央马克思恩格斯列宁斯大林著作编译局编译： 《马克思恩格斯文集》第1卷，北京：人民出版社，2009年，第711-743页。
8 法］米歇尔·福柯： 《权力的眼睛》，严锋译，上海：上海人民出版社，2021年。
9 McFalls L. & Pandolfi M.， “Too-late liberalism： from promised prosperity to permanent austerity，” in Bonditti P. ，Bigo D. & Gros F. （eds.）， Foucault and the Modern International： Silences and Legacies for the Study of World Politics， New York： Palgrave Macmillan， 2007， pp. 219-235.
10 美］亚历克斯·费尔德曼： 《权力、劳动力和生产力——福柯对〈资本论〉的解读》，梅沙白译，《国外理论动态》2021年第5期，第37-50页。
11 Foucault M.， “The meshes of power，” in Crampton J. W. & Elden S. （eds.）， Space， Knowledge and Power： Foucault and Geography， London： Routledge， 2007， pp. 153-162.
12 郭伟峰： 《资本主义治理危机与生命政治：逻辑、话语与实践》，《世界哲学》2022年第3期，第17-26页。
13 法］米歇尔·福柯： 《安全、领土与人口》，钱翰、陈晓径译，上海：上海人民出版社，2010年。
14 法］米歇尔·福柯： 《惩罚的社会》，陈雪杰译，上海：上海人民出版社，2018年。
15 法］米歇尔·福柯： 《必须保卫社会》，钱翰译，上海：上海人民出版社，2018年。
16 法］米歇尔·福柯： 《性经验史》，佘碧平译，上海：上海人民出版社，2005年。
17 德］马克思： 《资本论》第三卷，见中共中央马克思恩格斯列宁斯大林著作编译局编译： 《马克思恩格斯文集》第7卷，北京：人民出版社，2009年。
18 张青兰、王秀苹： 《现代性下资本逻辑批判的三重审视——基于〈资本论〉的反思》，《学术研究》2021年第4期，第25-31页。
19 张一兵： 《回到福柯：暴力性构序与生命治安的话语构境》，上海：上海人民出版社，2016年。
20 Choat S.， Marx Through Post-structuralism： Lyotard， Derrida， Foucault， Deleuze， London： Bloomsbury Publishing， 2010.
21 法］米歇尔·福柯： 《自我技术：福柯文选Ⅲ》，汪民安编，北京：北京大学出版社，2016年。
22 法］吉尔·德勒兹： 《在哲学与艺术之间：德勒兹访谈录》，刘汉全译，上海：上海人民出版社，2020年。 |
|
|
|
2024, Vol. 54 
