|
|
|
| Impact of Population Ageing on Farmland Use: Analysis of Micro Farmers Based on Large Sample |
| Zheng Linyi1,2, Qian Wenrong1,2 |
1.China Academy for Rural Development, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China
2.School of Public Affairs, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China |
|
|
|
|
Abstract Population ageing is a global trend. As the country with the largest population and the largest elderly population in the world, China’s ageing population problem cannot be ignored. In recent years, the degree of population ageing in China has further gone up, and there has even been a rural-urban inversion in which the ageing of the rural population is higher than that of the urban area, faster than that of the urban area, regional differences are greater than that of the urban area, and the elderly population is larger than that of the urban area. Compared with urban areas, the problem of population ageing in rural areas is more serious, and its negative impact on agricultural production has become increasingly prominent. However, while the use of farmland is a fundamental and directional issue, most of the current literature focuses primarily on the impact of population ageing on agricultural production efficiency. Studies on the relationship between population ageing and farmland use are still relatively lacking. Based on a systematic review of relevant literature, this study takes the sample of farmers as the research object, adopts the latest published data of the China Rural Household Panel Survey in 2017 and 2019, and comprehensively employs the panel-ordered Logit model, panel multi-dimensional fixed effect model, moderation effect model and sub-sample regression method. Starting from the household level, it focuses on the overall effect and specific impact of rural population ageing on farmland use, and conducts an in-depth analysis of the underlying mediation mechanism and moderation mechanism, with a view to providing a reference for strengthening farmland use in the context of rural population ageing.Empirical studies have found that population ageing has a significant negative impact on farmland utilization as a whole, shifting farmland use from full cultivation to partial or even all uncultivated use. This conclusion still holds after a series of robustness tests such as transformation estimation methods and replacement of core explanatory variables. Specifically, the ageing of the rural population reduces the probability of total farmland cultivation by 2.8%, the probability of partial farmland cultivation increases by 2.5%, the probability of farmland rent-in decreases by 1.7%, the probability of total farmland abandonment increases by 1.0%, and the probability of partial farmland abandonment increases by 2.0%. However, due to the relatively insufficient demand for farmland transfer at this stage, population ageing has an insignificant impact on farmland rent-out. The mechanism analysis found that the ageing of the population leads to the above-mentioned changes in the use of farmland, mainly because, as the ageing of the family population deepens, the elderly in rural areas gradually withdraw from agricultural production due to the decline in physical fitness and the increase in pension income, and young and middle-aged workers are also forced to work abroad due to the increase in economic burden, resulting in an insufficient supply of rural agricultural labor. Simultaneously, terrain and agricultural machinery play a moderating role in the process of population ageing affecting farmland use. The impact of population ageing on farmland use is more severe in mountainous areas than in plains, and the application of agricultural machinery can reduce this negative impact to some extent. Extended analysis shows that shifting farmland use from cultivation to abandonment not only reduces farmers’ likelihood of planting grain crops, but also significantly reduces farmers’ grain output.Based on the above findings, this study proposes that in the future, the government should first improve the land transfer market, strictly prevent and curb farmland abandonment, thus solving the problem of having enough farmland. Secondly, it is essential to cultivate new agricultural operation entities, do a good job of intergenerational inheritance of agricultural management, thus solving the problem of no workers farming farmland. Finally, it is crucial to boost the market for agricultural mechanization services, strengthen the substitution of machinery for labor, and thus address the inefficient cultivation of farmland. Through these measures, we can effectively ensure food security in an aging population.
|
|
Received: 16 January 2024
|
|
|
|
1 蔡昉：《中国老龄化挑战的供给侧和需求侧视角》，《经济学动态》2021年第1期，第27-34页。
2 陈卫：《国际视野下的中国人口老龄化》，《北京大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2016年第6期，第82-92页。
3 Wang Q.， Li L. & Li R.， “Uncovering the impact of income inequality and population aging on carbon emission efficiency： an empirical analysis of 139 countries，” Science of The Total Environment， Vol. 857 （2023）， https：//doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.159508.
4 谢永清、李香菊：《应对人口老龄化税收政策的国际经验及中国启示》，《人口与经济》2023年第5期，第88-97页。
5 Yao Y.， Lv X. & Qiu C. et al.， “The effect of China’s Clean Air Act on cognitive function in older adults： a population-based， quasi-experimental study，” The Lancet Healthy Longevity， Vol. 3， No. 2 （2022）， pp. e98-e108.
6 林宝：《中国农村人口老龄化的趋势、影响与应对》，《西部论坛》2015年第2期，第73-81页。
7 廖柳文、高晓路：《人口老龄化对乡村发展影响研究进展与展望》，《地理科学进展》2018年第5期，第617-626页。
8 王善高、田旭：《农村劳动力老龄化对农业生产的影响研究——基于耕地地形的实证分析》，《农业技术经济》2018年第4期，第15-26页。
9 Ren C.， Zhou X. & Wang C. et al.， “Ageing threatens sustainability of smallholder farming in China，” Nature， Vol. 616 （2023）， pp. 96-103.
10 魏佳朔、高鸣：《农业劳动力老龄化如何影响小麦全要素生产率增长》，《中国农村经济》2023年第2期，第109-128页。
11 周宏、王全忠、张倩：《农村劳动力老龄化与水稻生产效率缺失——基于社会化服务的视角》，《中国人口科学》2014年第1期，第53-65页。
12 Maestas N.， Mullen K. J. & Powell D.， “The effect of population aging on economic growth， the labor force， and productivity，” American Economic Journal： Macroeconomics， Vol. 15， No. 2 （2023）， pp. 306-332.
13 张瑞娟：《农村人口老龄化影响土地流转的区域差异及比较》，《农业技术经济》2017年第9期，第14-23页。
14 韩家彬、刘淑云、张书凤等：《农业劳动力老龄化对土地规模经营的影响》，《资源科学》2019年第12期，第2284-2295页。
15 林本喜、邓衡山：《农业劳动力老龄化对土地利用效率影响的实证分析——基于浙江省农村固定观察点数据》，《中国农村经济》2012年第4期，第15-25页。
16 周来友、仇童伟、周冬等：《丘陵山区劳动力老龄化对土地利用效率的影响——基于直接效应和间接效应的识别》，《中国土地科学》2015年第10期，第35-41页。
17 仇童伟、彭嫦燕：《农业人口老龄化对农地配置与种粮决策的影响：来自中国家庭金融调查的证据》，《中国农村观察》2023年第4期，第129-150页。
18 储怡菲、吴方卫：《农业劳动力老龄化与农地转出决策变动——基于家庭承包耕地决策权代际转移的视角》，《农业技术经济》，2023年9月5日，https：//doi.org/10.13246/j.cnki.jae.20230925.001。
19 杨进、陈志钢：《劳动力价格上涨和老龄化对农村土地租赁的影响》，《中国农村经济》2016年第5期，第71-83页。
20 胡雪枝、钟甫宁：《人口老龄化对种植业生产的影响——基于小麦和棉花作物分析》，《农业经济问题》2013年第2期，第36-43页。
21 张川川、陈斌开：《“社会养老”能否替代“家庭养老”？——来自中国新型农村社会养老保险的证据》，《经济研究》2014年第11期，第102-115页。
22 钱文荣、洪甘霖、郑淋议：《社会养老保障水平与农地流转市场发育——基于数量和质量的双重视角》，《农业经济问题》2022年第8期，第4-18页。
23 黄祖辉、李懿芸、毛晓红：《我国乡村老龄化现状及其对粮食生产的影响与应对》，《西北农林科技大学学报（社会科学版）》2024年第2期，第35-42页。
24 郑旭媛、徐志刚：《资源禀赋约束、要素替代与诱致性技术变迁——以中国粮食生产的机械化为例》，《经济学（季刊）》2017年第1期，第45-66页。
25 Qian W.， The Economy of Chinese Rural Households， Singapore： Palgrave Macmillan， 2020.
26 林宝：《人口老龄化城乡倒置：普遍性与阶段性》，《人口研究》2018年第3期，第38-50页。
27 随淑敏、何增华：《人口老龄化对企业创新的影响——基于人口普查数据与微观工业企业数据的实证分析》，《人口研究》2020年第6期，第63-78页。
28 蔡昉、都阳、高文书等：《劳动经济学——理论与中国现实》，北京：北京师范大学出版社，2014年。
29 Zheng L.， Su L. & Jin S.， “Reducing land fragmentation to curb cropland abandonment： evidence from rural China，” Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics， Vol. 71， No. 3-4 （2023）， pp. 355-373.
30 钱龙、冷智花、付畅俭：《人口老龄化对居民家庭创业行为的影响——来自CFPS的经验证据》，《改革》2021年第6期，第83-96页。
31 郑淋议：《农地产权稳定性对农户耕地抛荒行为的影响》，《中国人口·资源与环境》2022年第12期，第166-175页。
32 Zheng L. & Qian W.， “The impact of land certification on cropland abandonment： evidence from rural China，” China Agricultural Economic Review， Vol. 14， No. 3 （2022）， pp. 509-526.
33 Zheng L.， “Does off-farm work induce farmland abandonment？ evidence from China，” China Agricultural Economic Review， Vol. 16， No. 4 （2024）， pp. 664-682.
34 Zheng L.， “Big hands holding small hands： the role of new agricultural operating entities in farmland abandonment，” Food Policy， Vol. 123 （2024）， https：//doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2024.102605.
35 李宇、邱炳文、何玉花等：《基于MODIS数据的2001—2018年中国耕地复种指数反演研究》，《地理科学进展》2020年第11期，第1874-1883页。
36 江艇：《因果推断经验研究中的中介效应与调节效应》，《中国工业经济》2022年第5期，第100-120页。
37 Zheng L.， Li L. & Zhao Z. et al.， “Does land certification increase farmers’ use of organic fertilizer？ evidence from China，” Journal of Land Use Science， Vol. 18， No. 1 （2023）， pp. 39-54. |
|
|
|
2024, Vol. 54 
