|
|
Between Ci and History: Xia Chengtao’s Academic Interests and the New Song Learning in Modern China |
Zhang Kai, Xue Chenyu |
College of History, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China |
|
|
Abstract In modern academia, there has been a transformation in the study of history and classics. Promoting the New Song Learning by re-editing the Song history became a collective aspiration among many scholars during the Republic of China. Scholars such as Fang Zhuangyao, Meng Wentong, Liu Xianxin, Fu Sinian, Chen Yinque, Zhang Yinlin, and Jin Yupu successively attempted to re-edit the Song history. At this time, Xia Chengtao, a renowned poet, was wavering between Song Ci studies, the Song history, and Song Learning. The recently published Complete Diaries of Xia Chengtao provides a relatively systematic and vivid presentation of Xia Chengtao’s academic career.During the New Culture Movement of the early Republic of China, balancing new knowledge with traditional learning became a focal point in the academic circles. At this time, Xia Chengtao studied and researched history, classics and Li Xue. He familiarized himself with the methods of studying the Four Categories of Learning by the Qing Dynasty scholars through self-study, laying a foundation for his study of poetry. In the 1930s, while teaching at Hangchow University, Xia actively discussed the research objectives and methods of studying Song Ci, Song history, and Song Learning with senior colleagues and friends such as Zhang Ertian, Jin Songcen, Liu Yizheng, Huang Yunmei, and Deng Guangming, in order to resolve the conflict between historical and literary studies. In his later years, Xia reflected on his academic career, emphasizing that he had overcome the problem of being “greedy but not proficient” after repeated contemplation, and decided to specialize in the study of poetry based on his interests and accumulation of knowledge. However, the entanglement of classics, history, Li Xue, and practical affairs formed Xia’s broad perspective and profound scholarly insight in the study of the Song Ci, and also demonstrated the multiple aspects of the modern New Song Learning. The aim of modern New Song Learning is to fully integrate Chinese and Western, old and new knowledge, guided by Li Xue and, using modern literary and historical studies as the backbone, to achieve the modern transformation of Chinese culture. Firstly, in times of national crisis, it was an urgent task for the Song Studies to elucidate Li Xue and save people’s hearts and minds. Zhang Ertian emphasized that Song history should focus on distinguishing the relationship between Li Xue and the textual research. In order to promote Chinese culture, Xia Chengtao devoted himself to exploring ways in which Li Xue is intertwined with historical events, hoping to use his studies for practical purposes and to engage in meaningful academic researches. Secondly, in the context of modern academic and social discourse, historical studies must be the basis. Xia Chengtao adhered to the principle of “studying lyric poetry from historical perspectives” and established a modern system of Ci studies which is centered on poets’ anthologies. Moreover, academic research should have a comprehensive and interconnected perspective, combining both general and specialized knowledge. Through interactions with various scholars and inspired by Zhang Xuecheng’s method of historical analysis, Xia Chengtao gradually developed a plan for re-editing the Song history. His plan primarily focused on chronological events with biographical data as supplementary information, with charts and annotations, and also thematic studies.In modern times, specialized scientific research has become the mainstream trend in academia under the banner of scientific empiricism. Xia Chengtao’s struggles and doubts reflect the difficulties faced by scholars who straddle the past and present. By examining Xia Chengtao’s early academic career and systematically tracing his interactions with other scholars, we can outline the internal mechanisms and academic networks that shaped Xia’s early academic path within the context of the integration of Chinese and Western, old and new knowledge. This not only helps to clarify Xia Chengtao’s academic interests but also reveals the multifaceted nature of modern Song Learning and the Song history research, providing valuable insights for current reflections on Song Learning and Song history from the perspective of specialized scientific research.
|
Received: 13 January 2023
|
|
|
|
1 严复: 《与熊纯如书》(1917年4月26日),见王栻主编: 《严复集》第3册,北京:中华书局,1986年,第666-668页。 2 陈寅恪: 《邓广铭〈宋史职官志考证〉序》,见陈美延编: 《陈寅恪集·金明馆丛稿二编》,北京:生活·读书·新知三联书店,2001年,第277-288页。 3 钱穆: 《〈新亚学报〉发刊词》,《新亚学报》1955年第1期,第1-7页。 4 童书业: 《新宋学与新汉学》,《益世报·文苑》1946年12月13日,第9版。 5 梁启超: 《论中国学术思想变迁之大势》,见林志钧编: 《饮冰室合集》文集之七,北京:中华书局,1989年。 6 孙延钊: 《孙衣言孙诒让父子年谱》,徐和雍、周立人整理,上海:上海社会科学院出版社,2003年。 7 吴蓓主编: 《夏承焘日记全编》,杭州:浙江古籍出版社,2021年。 8 卢礼阳编注: 《梅冷生师友书札》,杭州:浙江古籍出版社,2020年。 9 张: 《张日记》,俞雄选编,上海:上海社会科学院出版社,2003年。 10 吴蓓: 《夏承焘早年日记述略(上)》,见马兴荣、邓乔彬主编: 《词学》第22辑,上海:华东师范大学出版社,2010年,第203-232页。 11 夏承焘: 《自述:我的治学道路》,见李剑亮编: 《夏承焘年谱》,北京:光明日报出版社,2012年,第2-10页。 12 邵祖平: 《邵祖平致钟泰信札一通六页》,见《钟泰友朋信札》,上海:朵云轩,2015年,第251-253页。 13 李慈铭: 《越缦堂日记》第3册,扬州:广陵书社,2004年。 14 梁启超: 《中国近三百年学术史》,朱维铮校注,上海:复旦大学出版社,2016年。 15 汤志钧: 《章太炎年谱长编》上册,北京:中华书局,1979年。 16 夏承焘: 《报张孟劬先生书》,《瓯风杂志》1934年第2期,第5-6页。 17 张尔田: 《历史五讲》,见孙文阁、张笑川编: 《中国近代思想家文库·张尔田 柳诒徵卷》,北京:中国人民大学出版社,2014年,第208-221页。 18 张尔田: 《遯堪摭言·论考据当注重微言大义》,《孔教会杂志》1913年第1卷第1期,第1-5页。 19 梁启超: 《新史学》,见林志钧编: 《饮冰室合集》文集之九,北京:中华书局,1989年,第1-29页。 20 张尔田: 《答梁任公论史学书》,《亚洲学术杂志》1922年第3期,第1-4页。 21 金松岑讲演,王謇、诸祖耿、王乘六等记录: 《中国学术之升降及今后之趋向(一名天人损益说)》,见项楚主编: 《新国学》第8卷,成都:巴蜀书社,2010年,第1-13页。 22 《国华中学敦请金松岑先生国学演讲》,《申报》1937年7月25日,第6版。 23 张尔田: 《与人论学术书》,《亚洲学术杂志》1922年第1卷第4期,第1-3页。 24 周予同: 《治经与治史》,见朱维铮编: 《周予同经学史论著选集》(增订本),上海:上海人民出版社,1983年,第621-626页。 25 黄云眉: 《读〈广论语骈枝·微子篇〉质章太炎先生》,见《史学杂稿订存》,北京:商务印书馆,2018年,第164-169页。 26 黄云眉: 《与夏瞿禅论改修〈宋史〉诸家书》,《文澜学报》1936年第2卷第1期,第1-6页。 27 胡可先主编: 《夏承焘学案》,杭州:浙江大学出版社,2018年。 28 夏承焘: 《夏承焘自述》,见高增德、丁东编: 《世纪学人自述》第1卷,北京:北京十月文艺出版社,2000年,第324-337页。 29 程千帆: 《论瞿翁词学》,见《词学》编辑委员会编: 《词学》第六辑,上海:华东师范大学出版社,1988年,第254页。 30 钱志熙: 《夏承焘先生早年学术道路试探》,见《中文学术前沿》编辑委员会编: 《中文学术前沿》第五辑,杭州:浙江大学出版社,2012年,第1-12页。 31 刘咸炘: 《唐迪风别传》,见唐迪风、陈卓仙、谢廷光编: 《唐君毅全集》第36卷,北京:九州出版社,第9-12页。 32 李埏: 《昔年从游之乐,今日终天之痛——敬悼先师钱宾四先生》,见中国人民政治协商会议江苏省无锡县委员会编: 《钱穆纪念文集》,上海:上海人民出版社,1992年,第6-24页。 33 柳诒徵: 《述〈宋史质〉》,《史学杂志》1929年第1卷第1期,第1-4页。 34 吴熊和: 《汲取到清澈百丈的源头活水》,见吴无闻等编: 《夏承焘教授纪念集》,北京:中国文联出版公司,1988年,第181-183页。 |
|
|
|