|
|
|
| A New Application of Technological Innovation: Cultural Common Prosperity through Urban and Rural Integration Empowered by Digital Culture |
| Xu Da1,2,3 |
1.Institute of Ecological Civilization, Zhejiang Agriculture and Forestry University, Hangzhou 311300, China
2.Institute on Rural Revitalization of Zhejiang Province, Zhejiang Agriculture and Forestry University, Hangzhou 311300, China
3.School of Landscape Architecture, Zhejiang Agriculture and Forestry University, Hangzhou 311300, China |
|
|
|
|
Abstract Since the 18th National Congress of the Communist Party of China, the country has attached increasing importance to cultural construction, and the development of urban and rural cultures has reached a new stage against the backdrop of urban and rural integration and digital reform. At the beginning of the 14th Five-Year Plan, the digital economy is developing and updating rapidly, and so is the digital technology. The key measures to accelerate the realization of “cultural common prosperity” include integrating urban and rural development empowered by digital culture, boosting people's spiritual wealth through cultural development, and seeking digital approaches to innovative integration of urban and rural cultures, so as to lay a solid foundation for the ultimate realization of “common prosperity”.The present study holds that digital culture is a cultural derivative in the digital age, reflecting the current collective awareness and ways of life, thus forming a collective personality. Its core is to pass down excellent cultures that influence “the Internet of values”, which are spontaneous, interactive and convenient. As these cultures belong to the masses, they are also equal, sharable and sustainable. Under the influence of digital culture, the barriers against mutually constructive development of rural and urban cultures are gradually disappearing. However, there still exist some problems: first, the cultural mobility is blocked, resulting in a digital divide; second, the existing barriers between urban and rural cultures still remain, making cultural integration more difficult; third, it is hard to deploy urban and rural resources required for introducing digital culture; fourth, digital cultural industries in the urban and rural areas are restricted, so the construction of new scenarios of cultural consumption is confronted with challenges.This study understands the inherent driving force of the integrated development of urban and rural cultures through three aspects, namely, innovation empowerment, technology empowerment and evaluation empowerment. Innovation empowerment is creative development of theories and vivid interpretation of policies, aiming at implementing a new pattern for cultural common prosperity of urban and rural areas, which is symbolized by spiritual wealth. Technology empowerment means scenario presentation and practical application of the integration between digitized urban and rural cultures, so as to establish a system of group sharing in this regard. Evaluation empowerment focuses on the construction of a system of digitized urban and rural cultures and its evaluation indexes, which incorporates cultural integration, protection, inheritance, service and governance, and it can further evolve into various evaluation systems and indexes that are applied to different forms, scenarios, industries and subjects of urban and rural cultures.With the goal of “cultural prosperity”, multi-dimensional approaches are suggested for urban and rural integration empowered by digital culture. First, the “top-down+bottom-up” orientation can be used to guide digital development of urban and rural cultures. Second, the “smart-governance+self-autonomy” model can provide more room for governance. Third, the “decoding+translation” method can facilitate exchanges and mutual learning between digitized rural and urban cultures. Fourth, the “online+offline” channel can be utilized to promote interaction of digitized urban and rural cultural resources. Fifth, the “inclusion+sharing” concept can be applied to enhance diversified cultural identity of digitized rural and urban cultures. Based on these five approaches, it is possible to abide by the essential values and spiritual commitment of the integrated development of urban and rural areas empowered by digital culture, in its bid to achieve “cultural common prosperity”.
|
|
Received: 08 December 2022
|
|
|
|
1 夏海燕： 《论精神生活共同富裕实现的文化路径》，《江苏社会科学》2022年第6期，第63-71页。
2 康铁祥： 《数字经济及其核算研究》，《统计与决策》2008年第5期，第19-21页。
3 张辉、石琳： 《数字经济：新时代的新动力》，《北京交通大学学报（社会科学版）》2019年第2期，第10-22页。
4 柳杨、李君、左越： 《数字经济发展态势与关键路径研究》，《中国管理信息化》2019年第15期，第112-114页。
5 沈费伟、叶温馨： 《基层政府数字治理的运作逻辑、现实困境与优化策略——基于“农事通”“社区通”“龙游通”数字治理平台的考察》，《管理学刊》2020年第6期，第26-35页。
6 张英男、龙花楼、屠爽爽等： 《电子商务影响下的“淘宝村”乡村重构多维度分析——以湖北省十堰市郧西县下营村为例》，《地理科学》2019年第6期，第947-956页。
7 罗震东、何鹤鸣： 《新自下而上进程——电子商务作用下的乡村城镇化》，《城市规划》2017年第3期，第31-40页。
8 范以锦、郑昌茂： 《数字乡村文化振兴的路径探析和逻辑建构》，《中国编辑》2021年第11期，第16-22页。
9 赛娜： 《数字技术促进文化消费创新发展的机制与趋势分析》，《商业经济研究》2021年第6期，第57-59页。
10 梁漱溟： 《中国文化要义》，上海：上海人民出版社，2011年。
11 王威孚、朱磊： 《关于对“文化”定义的综述》，《江淮论坛》2006年第2期，第190-192页。
12 余秋雨： 《何谓文化》，武汉：长江文艺出版社，2012年。
13 江小涓： 《数字时代的技术与文化》，《中国社会科学》2021年第8期，第4-34页。
14 《中共中央、国务院关于实施乡村振兴战略的意见》编写组： 《关于实施乡村振兴战略的意见》，北京：人民出版社，2018年。
15 张学昌： 《城乡融合视域下的乡村文化振兴》，《西北农林科技大学学报（社会科学版）》2020年第4期，第56-64页。
16 陈潭： 《数字时代城乡融合发展的着力点与新路径》，《人民论坛·学术前沿》2021年第2期，第19-27页。
17 陈晓华： 《我国城乡二元经济结构转换中的数字鸿沟效应与对策》，《农业现代化研究》2014年第1期，第38-42页。
18 陈肖飞、姚士谋、张落成： 《新型城镇化背景下中国城乡统筹的理论与实践问题》，《地理科学》2016年第2期，第188-195页。
19 文丰安、王星： 《新时代城乡融合高质量发展：科学内涵、理论基础与推动路径》，《新视野》2020年第3期，第39-44页。
20 中共中央马克思恩格斯列宁斯大林著作编译局编译： 《马克思恩格斯选集》第1卷，北京：人民出版社，1995年。
21 中共中央文献研究室： 《邓小平年谱（1975—1997）》（下），北京：中央文献出版社，2004年。
22 罗仕鉴、王瑶、张德寅： 《文化产业数字化内生生长与外生协同创新的进化机理研究》，《浙江大学学报（人文社会科学版）》2022年第4期，第94-104页。
23 翁列恩、杨竞楠： 《大数据驱动的政府绩效精准管理：动因分析、现实挑战与未来进路》，《理论探讨》2022年第1期，第86-93页。
24 刘烨斌、郑瑞强： 《数字乡村赋能乡村振兴：基本维度、现实困境与路径优化》，《宁夏大学学报（人文社会科学版）》2022年第5期，第191-200页。
25 赵霞： 《传统乡村文化的秩序危机与价值重建》，《中国农村观察》2011年第3期，第80-86页。
26 刘志刚、陈安国： 《乡村振兴视域下城乡文化的冲突、融合与互哺》，《行政管理改革》2019年第12期，第60-65页。
27 陈志钢、茅锐、张云飞： 《城乡融合发展与共同富裕：内涵、国际经验与实现路径》，《浙江大学学报（人文社会科学版）》2022年第7期，第68-78页。 |
|
|
|
2023, Vol. 53 
