|
|
|
| A Research on the Evolution of Endogenous Growth and Exogenous Co-innovation in Cultural Industry Digitization |
| Luo Shijian, Wang Yao, Zhang Deyin |
| College of Computer Science and Technology, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310027, China |
|
|
|
|
Abstract The digital transformation of the cultural industry as part of the world digital economy has become a focus of industrial and academic research. Driven by several factors including Chinese cultural exports, new cultural infrastructure, and the digital economy, the government in China has conducted in-depth studies on the digitalization of its cultural industry, and prioritized strategic plans for the development of cultural industries. So far, the digitization of China’s cultural industry has experienced three important phases of development. First, a focus on the structure, cluster, and system reform of the cultural industry. Second, the protection of intangible cultural heritages and the digital collections of cultural heritages. Third, and currently is a focus on the impact of artificial intelligence, virtual reality, and other technologies. This entails cultural big-data platforms, digital public culture services, manufacturing of cultural smart devices, development of digital governance policies in the cultural industry, and numerous other aspects. Despite this strong government support, there are still many problems in the digital development of the cultural industry in China, such as imbalances in supply, insufficient online consumption capacity, lack of access to digital resources, lack of top-level data links, late start of digital public cultural services, and insufficient technological support for digital cultural smart devices. As a part of redressing these problems, this paper analyzed current trends and developments in digitization of the Chinese culture industries, in order to provide opinions on the situation from the perspectives of endogenous growth and exogenous synergy. The author has analyzed 700 relevant articles from Chinese CNKI databases and government documents from official platforms and public cultural service institutions such as government websites, the Intangible Cultural Heritage Network, and public cultural service agencies.Endogenous growth has been limited in this study to specifically endogenous factors in culture, importantly based on endogenous values of the cultural industry. This includes studies in the ecological and market subsystems of the inner circulation of digitalization in the Chinese industry, where China should lead the reform of the supply in the market, how to strengthen the digital governance and supervision of the management, how to stimulate the manufacture of cultural smart devices, provide supports and guidance for creators of cultural activities, and how to boost the creation of traditional culture through artificial intelligence and other technology. These five important aspects can increase the creation, manufacture, sale, distribution, and dissemination of endogenous culture, and stimulate internal factors in China’s cultural industry.Exogenous synergy of the digitalization of the cultural industry falls under the study of the exogenous factors in culture. In the ecological subsystem of the outer circulation of digitalization of the cultural industry, we should establish collaborative relationships within industry with a platform thinking-pattern, emphasize the development of multiple integrated industries, develop cultural big data platform, that provides a powerful and colorful cultural data source for multi-industry integration. We should also promote the industrial standardized acquisition of cultural resources and the storage management of cultural style resources, build a cultural industry network and a digital public cultural service platform, and support cultural consumption to drive the marketing innovation on multiple platforms.With the purpose of building a country with strong cultural power, there are many measures we could take to establish an endogenous and exogenous dual-circulation mechanism that contributes to knowledge sharing, joint cooperation and governance, as well as joint efforts in creation, and achieve a win-win situation with common prosperity, thereby boosting the digital development of the cultural industry in China. We should build an integrated ecosystem of the digitalization of the cultural industry and promote innovations in services, systems, and content of the cultural industry.
|
|
Received: 19 January 2022
|
|
|
|
1 史金易、王志凯： 《加强数字经济认知，推动经济社会迭代创新》，《浙江大学学报（人文社会科学版）》2021年第5期，第149-156页。
2 田野： 《新基建时代提升大城市群数字文化产业的创新活力》，《同济大学学报（社会科学版）》2021年第3期，第73-81页。
3 花建： 《在线新经济与中国文化产业新业态：主要特点、国际借鉴和重点任务》，《同济大学学报（社会科学版）》2021年第3期，第54-64页。
4 傅才武： 《当代公共文化服务体系建设与传统文化事业体系的转型》，《江汉论坛》2012年第1期，第134-140页。
5 图拉、马晓娜、杜鹃等： 《敦煌壁画色彩数字化采集研究》，《装饰》2019年第1期，第28-35页。
6 黄永林、纪明明： 《论非物质文化遗产资源在文化产业中的创造性转化和创新性发展》，《华中师范大学学报（人文社会科学版）》2018年第3期，第72-80页。
7 郑志元、陈刚： 《城市文化创意街区的建设模式与空间品质塑造研究》，《江淮论坛》2017年第6期，第170-173页。
8 陈波、穆晨： 《互联网条件下虚拟公共文化空间模式研究》，《艺术百家》2019年第1期，第61-69页。
9 吴承忠： 《5G时代文化产业发展新趋势》，《中国社会科学报》2020年10月13日，第1版。
10 左惠： 《文化产业数字化发展趋势论析》，《南开学报（哲学社会科学版）》2020年第6期，第47-58页。
11 刘中华、焦基鹏： 《文旅融合背景下海派传统工艺美术IP资源开发策略研究》，《浙江大学学报（人文社会科学版）》2022年第1期，第126-135页。
12 黄永林、余欢： 《智能媒体技术在非物质文化遗产传播中的运用》，《华中师范大学学报（人文社会科学版）》2019年第6期，第122-129页。
13 唐琳： 《文旅新基建中少数民族文化消费数字化研究》，《广西民族大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2020年第5期，第74-79页。
14 盘华、黄永林： 《网络社区社交的新特征、面临的社会风险及其防范》，《社会主义研究》2021年第３期，第122-129页。
15 郭雪慧： 《人工智能时代的个人信息安全挑战与应对》，《浙江大学学报（人文社会科学版）》2021年第5期，第157-169页。
16 段莉： 《文化创客：人与产业平衡发展新探》，《福建论坛（人文社会科学版）》2016年第10期，第136-142页。
17 常天恺： 《“智能+”时代文化装备制造业的数字化升级与创新》，《人文天下》2021年第7期，第8-13页。
18 刘芳、王遵富、梁晓婷： 《文化大数据与智能设计平台综述》，《包装工程》2021年第14期，第1-8页。
19 罗仕鉴： 《新时代文化产业数字化战略研究》，《包装工程》2021年第18期，第63-72，8页。
20 郭寅曼、季铁、闵晓蕾： 《文化大数据公共服务平台的可及性交互设计研究》，《艺术设计研究》2021年第5期，第50-57页。
21 贺怡、傅才武： 《数字文化空间下公共文化服务体系建设的创新方向与改革路径》，《国家图书馆学刊》2021年第2期，第105-113页。 |
|
|
|
2022, Vol. 52 
