|
|
|
| Talent Cultivation Based on Integration Between Industry and Education in the New Era: A Textual Analysis Based on Policy Tools |
| Zhang Zifa1,2, Wang Yujie1, Li Tuoyu1, Zhu Ling1 |
1.School of Public Affairs, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China
2.School of Economics, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China |
|
|
|
|
Abstract The research on the integration between industry and education has always been a hot topic in the academia. However, there still remains some shortcomings, such as insufficient attention to the talent cultivation based on the integration between industry and education in undergraduate universities, the imperfect policy system for the talent cultivation of industry-education integration, and the lack of corresponding empirical research. This paper focuses on the core issue of “how to promote talent cultivation in the new era by establishing and improving the policy system of the integration between industry and education” and introduces policy tools. Through empirical research, this paper systematically sorts out the relevant policies, so as to lay a foundation for further designing and optimizing the industry-education integration talent cultivation policy system. Since the founding of the People’s Republic of China, the evolution of the industry-education integration policy can be divided into three stages: the integration of education and production, the (loose) cooperation between industry and education, and the gradual integration between industry and education. In 2017, as Several Opinions of the General Office of the State Council on Deepening the Integration of Industry and Education was officially released, the integration between industry and education became an institutional arrangement at the national level. By introducing policy tools, we construct an X-Y two-dimensional analysis framework of “policy tools-industry-education integration subjects”. This study selects 64 relevant policy texts of talent cultivation based on the integration between industry and education as research samples. The policy texts selected come from different levels: national, provincial, municipal and so forth. We analyze the policy structure logic, such as the characteristics of the subjects of the policy, the preference for policy tools, and the policy theme content, and explore the formal characteristics of the policy texts, so as to grasp the focus of current policies on the industry-education integration talent cultivation. It is found that the policy system of the integration between industry and education can be further optimized in the following aspects: First, the multi-subject characteristics that need to be highlighted in the process of industry-education integration are still not significant, and more targeted policy initiatives need to be formulated in terms of promoting multi-subject collaboration, strengthening government guidance, and balancing the structure of industry-education cooperation. Second, the types of industry-education integration policy tools and their implementation methods can be more diversified, emphasizing the value of relevant organizations in the training activities of industry-education integration to stimulate their enthusiasm to participate in the training activities. Third, centering on the cultivation of high-level talents. It is necessary to design targeted measures for the integration between industry and education in undergraduate universities and implement them systematically. Future policies should focus on accelerating the strategic research and top-level design of the talent cultivation based on the integration between industry and education, strengthening the construction of multi-subject talent cultivation cooperation system of industry-education integration, and improving the guarantee system of talent cultivation of industry-education integration, etc. To sum up, based on the deficiencies of relevant research on the integration between industry and education, this paper will contribute to the related researches on the integration between industry and education in the following aspects: First of all, this paper focuses on the construction of the policy system for the talent cultivation based on the integration between industry and education. At present, a substantial number of theoretical studies on the talent cultivation based on the integration between industry and education mainly stay on the discussion of the mechanism and model, and rarely analyze how the integration of industry-education can achieve talent cultivation from the perspective of policy construction, while this study broadens the research perspective of relevant research. Secondly, through the introduction of policy tools and empirical research, this paper puts forward targeted and operational future policy suggestions. In addition, on the basis of previous studies, we pay more attention to the talent cultivation based on the integration between industry and education in undergraduate universities, expecting to provide policy references for undergraduate universities to cultivate high-level talents through the implementation of industry-education integration.
|
|
Received: 17 June 2022
|
|
|
|
1 教育部、人力资源社会保障部、工业和信息化部： 《制造业人才发展规划指南》，2017年1月11日，http：//www.moe.gov.cn/srcsite/A07/moe_953/201702/W020170214589125139987.doc，2022年6月17日。
2 Oliver C.， “Sustainable competitive advantage： combining institutional and resource-based views，” Strategic Management Journal， Vol. 18， No. 9 （1997）， pp. 697-713.
3 魏江： 《持续竞争优势：制度观、资源观与创新观》，《自然辩证法通讯》1999年第2期，第39-45，59-80页。
4 Barney J. B.， “Resource-based theories of competitive advantage： a ten-year retrospective on the resource-based view，” Journal of Management， Vol. 27， No. 6 （2001）， pp. 643-650.
5 李玉倩、蔡瑞林、陈万明： 《面向新工科的集成化产教融合平台构建——基于不完全契约的视角》，《中国高教研究》2018年第3期，第38-43页。
6 Etzkowit H. & Leydesdorff L.， “The endless transition： a ‘triple helix’ of university-industry-government relations，” Minerva， Vol. 36， No. 3 （1998）， pp. 203-208.
7 杨善江： 《“产教融合”的院校、企业、政府角色新探——基于“三重螺旋”理论框架》，《高等农业教育》2014年第12期，第117-119页。
8 邵进： 《产学研深度融合的探索与思考——基于三重螺旋模型的分析》，《中国高校科技》2015年第8期，第7-9页。
9 苏敬勤： 《产学研合作创新的交易成本及内外部化条件》，《科研管理》1999年第5期，第68-72页。
10 King A.， “Cooperation between corporations and environmental groups： a transaction cost perspective，” Academy of Management Review， Vol. 32， No. 3 （2007）， pp. 889-900.
11 顾佳峰： 《基于交易成本的高校产学合作创新管理机制研究》，《研究与发展管理》2008年第4期，第106-111页。
12 李玉倩、陈万明： 《产教融合的集体主义困境：交易成本理论诠释与实证检验》，《中国高教研究》2019年第9期，第67-73页。
13 易卓： 《组织社会学视角下“引教入企”的产教融合模式探索》，《高等工程教育研究》2021年第5期，第134-140页。
14 叶小青、徐渝： 《企业—高校合作创新方式选择的非对称信息博弈研究》，《科研管理》2003年第6期，第44-48页。
15 李光红： 《校企合作创新的演化博弈分析》，《科技管理研究》2007年第8期，第153-154页。
16 徐刚、杨超： 《基于演化博弈分析的产学研协同创新引导模式优化与选择》，《研究与发展管理》2020年第1期，第123-133页。
17 赵筱媛、苏竣： 《基于政策工具的公共科技政策分析框架研究》，《科学学研究》2007年第1期，第52-56页。
18 Roy R.， “Reindustrialization and technology： towards a national policy framework，” Science and Public Policy， Vol. 12， No. 3 （1985）， pp. 113-130.
19 顾建光、吴明华： 《公共政策工具论视角述论》，《科学学研究》2007年第1期，第47-51页。
20 范丽莉、唐珂： 《基于政策工具的我国政府数据开放政策内容分析》，《情报杂志》2019年第1期，第53，148-154页。 |
|
|
|
2022, Vol. 52 
