重文政策下的北宋科举变革

doi:10.3785/j.issn.1008-942X.CN33-6000/C.2021.04.192

Abstract
Figure/Table
References
Related Citation (15)

Download: PDF (820 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract The selection of civil servants in the Northern Song Dynasty was mainly done through the Imperial Examinations (keju) system. In the early Song Dynasty, reforms of the Imperial Examinations that had been carried out since the Tang Dynasty could not adapt to the new political situations. New reforms mainly included three aspects as follows.The reforms started with Emperor Taizu, who established palace examinations and thus had talent selection controlled in his own hand. The examinees who passed palace examinations were regarded as the disciples of the emperor, the Son of Heaven, and that greatly aroused the enthusiasm of scholars. However, the number of admissions in the reign of Taizu had no significant change compared with that in the Five Dynasties because the national policy of emphasizing literati and restraining the military was still in the exploratory stage. In the reign of Emperor Taizong, upon the unification of the country, the establishment of a national government system with literati as the main body was put on the agenda. Based on the needs of civil politics, Emperor Taizong continuously expanded the number of admissions in the Imperial Examinations in order to supplement and update the bureaucratic team with new talents. As such, the proportion of officials selected through the Imperial Examinations was greatly increased in the bureaucratic system, which laid a solid foundation for promoting the formation of civil politics.In order to select talents for the government, the subjects and contents of the Imperial Examinations were gradually adjusted. In the reign of Emperor Renzong, the systems of shuoshuju (说书举) and mingjing ke (明经科) were set up, which changed the concept of talent selection from focusing on poetry and memorization in the Tang Dynasty to emphasizing interpretation of classics. In the fourth year of Xining, Wang Anshi reformed the Imperial Examinations system and officially abolished various subjects, mingjing ke and poetry and fu (赋) , tie jing (帖经) and mo yi (墨义) and turned to the focus on classics interpretation (yi, 义) , exposition (lun, 论) ,and policy response essays (ce, 策). The selection of talents shifted from emphasis on literary skills to the candidates' practical ability. Literary talents selected through poetry and fu had little to do with national governance while classics interpretation, exposition,and policy response essays focused on governance in ancient and modern times and current politics. The classics exegesis required the examinees to quote from classics to deal with ideological and theoretical issues related to the people's well-being, politics, economy, morality and self-cultivation and so forth. Creative answers were of positive significance for selecting talents who were proficient in Confucian Classics and practical abilities to participate in the country's government. This was the fundamental reason for the reform of the Imperial Examinations which had been established and carried out since the Tang and Five Dynasties.In order to improve the overall quality of civil servants and their ability to govern the country as well as unify their thinking, the state began to attach importance to education and official schools were encouraged. During the reign of Emperor Huizong, based on Wang Anshi's Three Hall System (sanshefa, 三舍法), the reform of sanshe gongshi (三舍贡士) combined the selection of talents through the Imperial Examinations with school education. Local government schools at various levels were established to match with the contents of the Imperial Examinations. Thus, a set of management system of talent training, selection and appointment was formed to better serve civil politics. From the third year of Chongning to the third year of Xuanhe, the gongshi examination had been carried out twelve times nationwide. It was a beneficial attempt to combine the selection of talents through the Imperial Examinations in alliance with school education, which had a far-reaching impact on future generations. In the Ming Dynasty, the Imperial Examinations must be carried out through the school system.In short, the reform on the Imperial Examinations System in the Northern Song Dynasty has a positive historical significance in eradicating the dictatorship of the military officials, establishing civil politics and strengthening centralized rule.

Key words： civilian politics the Northern Song Dynasty the reform of the Imperial Examinations the number of admissions subjects contents sanshe gongshi

Received: 19 April 2021

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	Zu Hui
	Fei Xikuan

TRENDMD:

Cite this article:

Zu Hui,Fei Xikuan. The Reform of the Imperial Examinations in the Northern Song Dynasty under Civilian Politics[J]. JOURNAL OF ZHEJIANG UNIVERSITY, 2021, 51(6): 5-17.

URL:

https://www.zjujournals.com/soc/EN/10.3785/j.issn.1008-942X.CN33-6000/C.2021.04.192 OR https://www.zjujournals.com/soc/EN/Y2021/V51/I6/5

李昉等编：《文苑英华》，北京：中华书局，1982年。2 金滢坤：《中国科举制度通史·隋唐五代卷》，上海：上海人民出版社，2019年。3 张希清：《中国科举制通史·宋代卷》，上海：上海人民出版社，2019年。4 李焘：《续资治通鉴长编》，上海师范大学古籍所、华东师范大学古籍所点校，北京：中华书局，2004年。5 孙逢吉：《职官分纪》，北京：中华书局，1988年。6 脱脱等：《宋史》，北京：中华书局，2017年。7 王栐：《燕翼诒谋录》，诚刚点校，北京：中华书局，1981年。8 邓小南：《祖宗之法：北宋前期政治述略》，北京：生活·读书·新知三联书店，2006年。9 钱穆：《国史大纲》（下册），北京：商务印书馆，2010年。10 龚延明、祖慧编著：《宋代登科总录》，桂林：广西师范大学出版社，2014年。11 徐松辑：《宋会要辑稿》，刘琳、刁忠民、舒大刚等校点，上海：上海古籍出版社，2014年。12 迟振汉：《北宋宰相制度》，台北：丽文文化事业股份有限公司，2010年。13 蔡襄：《蔡襄集》，吴以宁点校，上海：上海古籍出版社，1996年。14 范仲淹：《范仲淹全集》，李勇先、王蓉贵校点，成都：四川大学出版社，2007年。15 王勋成：《唐代铨选与文学》，北京：中华书局，2001年。16 欧阳修、宋祁：《新唐书》，北京：中华书局，1975年。17 马端临：《文献通考》，上海师范大学古籍研究所、华东师范大学古籍研究所点校，北京：中华书局，2011年。18 王珪：《华阳集》，北京：中华书局，1985年。19 胡宿：《文恭集》，北京：中华书局，1985年。20 司马光：《司马光全集》，成都：四川大学出版社，2010年。21 苏辙：《栾城后集》，见《苏辙集》第3册，陈宏天、高秀芳校点，北京：中华书局，1990年。22 何忠礼：《略论宋代的明经科》，《杭州大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》1992年第4期，第88-94页。23 赵汝愚编：《宋朝诸臣奏议》，上海：上海古籍出版社，1999年。24 王应麟：《困学纪闻》，上海：上海古籍出版社，2015年。25 杜佑：《通典》，北京：中华书局，1988年。26 董诰等编：《全唐文》，北京：中华书局，1983年。27 王钦若等：《册府元龟》，北京：中华书局，1982年。28 严羽：《沧浪诗话》，北京：中华书局，1985年。29 黄以周等辑注：《续资治通鉴长编拾补》，顾吉辰点校，北京：中华书局，2004年。30 张希清：《论王安石的贡举改革》，《北京大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》1986年第4期，第66-77页。31 王安石：《临川先生文集》，北京：中华书局，1959年。32 龚延明：《宋代“殿试不黜落”考》，《西北师范大学学报（社会科学版）》2005年第1期，第57-61页。33 彭百川：《太平治迹统类》，扬州：广陵古籍刻印社，1990年。34 祖慧：《两宋“上舍释褐”考述》，《文史》2007年第4期，第237-246页。35 龚延明：《中国古代制度史研究》，杭州：浙江大学出版社，2013年。36 李：《皇宋十朝纲要校正》（下册），燕永成校正，北京：中华书局，2013年。37 李心传：《建炎以来朝野杂记》，徐规点校，北京：中华书局，2000年。38 张廷玉等：《明史》，北京：中华书局，1974年。