对抗焦虑：词人身份观念的自觉与演进

doi:10.3785/j.issn.1008-942X.CN33-6000/C.2023.11.091

Abstract
Figure/Table
References
Related Citation (15)

Download: PDF (1331 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract The study of author’s identity is an important dimension of literary research. In the field of Ci, most scholars focus on the objective identity phenomenon of lyricists, using it as an opportunity to discuss how authors write. However, there is a scarcity of discussion on the concept of the identity of Ci Writers.Ci has been detached from the Confucian value of being the Big Other since its inception, which has also led to the constant anxiety of deviation when literati participate in the creation of Ci. During the Tang and Northern Song Dynasties, being skilled in writing Ci was often not considered something to boast about, and the content of the Ci was not considered to be related to the author’s own sentiments. The self-awareness and evolution of the identity concept of Ci Writers imply a process of the anxiety brought about by the lyricist’s resistance to the Confucian values of being the Big Other.Attaining an exclusive title signifies the lyricist’s self-awareness of their identity. Prior to the emergence of Ci, Ci Writers (Ciren) often referred to individuals skilled in literary expressions or authors of Ci Fu, frequently finding themselves excluded from the Confucian value system. During the Southern Song Dynasty, lyricists acquired a heightened self-awareness of their identity and formally adopted “Ci Writers” as a specialized title. The meaning of Ci Writers includes a pre-understanding of their identity: deviating from orthodoxy, carrying identity anxiety, and holding the potential for upward mobility.During the Northern Song Dynasty, lyricists held a dual identity of literati and Ci Writers, yet they lacked conscious awareness of the identity of Ci Writers, and failed to develop a concept of compatibility with this dual identity. In contrast to the Northern Song Dynasty, the status of literati in the later period of the Southern Song Dynasty was relatively diminished. They wandered on the edge of Confucian values, without the weighty burden of Confucianism. Consequently, they confronted both their professional literati roles and the identity of Ci Writers, evolving an identity pattern of “Ci Writers-Literati”. It can be said that the transformation of the identity of literary authors in the Southern Song Dynasty from literati to professional literati was the motivation for the conscious acquisition of their identity as Ci Writers. It did not imply the elimination of anxiety but rather a compromise with reality prompted by the modesty of their own identity during moments of anxiety.To overcome the anxiety of identity imposed by Confucianism on the author, inclusion in the Confucian literary genre based on the principle of “expressing one’s will” becomes imperative. In the Northern Song Dynasty, the content of Ci was often considered unrelated to the author’s genuine emotions, leading to its exclusion from the Confucian poetic tradition of “expressing one’s will”. Only during the Ming Dynasty did the concept of “Ci as its author” become self-evident, transforming Ci into a genre capable of articulating one’s “will”. This transformation served as a prerequisite for entering the Confucian literary genre, ultimately leading to the elimination of identity anxiety.As the academic atmosphere of the Qing Dynasty shifted towards positivism, scholars who studied Confucian classics (jingsheng) participated in the creation of Ci. The identity consciousness of Changzhou scholars as “literati-jingsheng” transitioned into the study of Ci, establishing the identity pattern and concept of “Ci Writers-scholars”. This allowed them to express their academic thoughts through Ci. The identity of Ci Writers, as an extension of their academic identity, became mutually supportive, facilitating the complete elimination of identity anxiety imposed by Confucianism.The formation of the identity concept led scholars, who were most deeply influenced by Confucianism, to participate in the creation of Ci, thereby causing the academic transformation of Ci and contributing to the maturation of Ci as a discipline of study in the Qing Dynasty. For these scholars, the study of Ci encompassed both self (viewing themselves as authors) and others (considering Ci as the object of study). This identity concept has also endured in modern Ci studies due to its closed and inherited nature, evolving into a collective unconsciousness that significantly influences the development of Ci studies.

Key words： Ci writers identity consciousness anxiety Ci as its author

Received: 09 November 2023

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	Liu Zehua
	Peng Guozhong

Cite this article:

Liu Zehua,Peng Guozhong. Confronting Anxiety: Consciousness and Evolution of the Identity Concept of Ci Writers[J]. JOURNAL OF ZHEJIANG UNIVERSITY, 2024, 54(4): 119-131.

URL:

https://www.zjujournals.com/soc/EN/10.3785/j.issn.1008-942X.CN33-6000/C.2023.11.091 OR https://www.zjujournals.com/soc/EN/Y2024/V54/I4/119

1 杨景龙校注：《花间集校注》，北京：中华书局，2014年。
2 罗隐：《甲乙集》，见雍文华校辑：《罗隐集》，北京：中华书局，1983年。
3 辛弃疾：《辛弃疾词集校笺》，吴企明校笺，上海：上海古籍出版社，2018年。
4 白居易：《白居易诗集校注》，谢思炜校注，北京：中华书局，2006年。
5 戴复古：《戴复古诗集》，金芝山点校，杭州：浙江古籍出版社，2012年。
6 彭定求等编：《全唐诗》，北京：中华书局，1960年。
7 陈世修：《阳春集序》，见曾枣庄主编：《宋代序跋全编》第1册，济南：齐鲁书社，2015年，第329页。
8 刘攽：《彭城集》，逯铭昕点校，济南：齐鲁书社，2018年。
9 黄庭坚：《黄庭坚全集》，刘琳、李勇先、王蓉贵点校，成都：四川大学出版社，2001年。
10 胡仔：《苕溪渔隐丛话·后集》，廖德明点校，北京：人民文学出版社，1962年。
11 陈元靓：《岁时广记》，许逸民点校，北京：中华书局，2020年。
12 陶岳：《五代史补》，郑州：大象出版社，2019年。
13 吴曾：《能改斋漫录》，上海：上海古籍出版社，1979年。
14 扬雄：《法言义疏》，汪荣宝注疏、陈仲夫点校，北京：中华书局，1987年。
15 班固：《汉书》，北京：中华书局，1962年。
16 司马迁：《史记》，北京：中华书局，1982年。
17 刘勰：《文心雕龙注》，范文澜注，北京：人民文学出版社，1958年。
18 姚思廉：《梁书》，北京：中华书局，1973年。
19 李延寿：《北史》，北京：中华书局，1974年。
20 赵幼文校注：《曹植集校注》，北京：中华书局，2016年。
21 尚衡：《文道元龟》，见董诰编：《全唐文》卷三百九十四，北京：中华书局，1983年，第4014页。
22 杨愔：《文德论》，见严可均编：《全上古三代秦汉三国六朝文·全北齐文》卷二，北京：中华书局，1958年，第3837页。
23 王泠然：《与御史高昌宇书》，见董诰等编：《全唐文》卷二百九十四，北京：中华书局，1983年，第2983-2984页。
24 班固：《离骚序》，见严可均编：《全上古三代秦汉三国六朝文·全汉文》卷二十五，北京：中华书局，1958年，第611页。
25 元稹：《元稹集》，北京：中华书局，2010年。
26 贺贻孙：《骚筏》，见《四库未收书辑刊》编纂委员会编：《四库未收书辑刊》第10辑第13册，北京：北京出版社，2000年。
27 喻汝砺：《晁具茨先生诗集序》，见曾枣庄、刘琳主编：《全宋文》第178册卷三八八九，上海：上海辞书出版社，合肥：安徽教育出版社，2006年，第4-6页。
28 黄裳：《书乐章集后》，见曾枣庄、刘琳主编：《全宋文》第103册卷二二五○，上海：上海辞书出版社，合肥：安徽教育出版社，2006年，第106页。
29 宇文逌：《庾信集序》，见严可均编：《全上古三代秦汉三国六朝文·全后周文》卷四，北京：中华书局，1958年，第3901-3903页。
30 沈约：《宋书》，北京：中华书局，1974年。
31 萧统：《文选序》，见严可均编：《全上古三代秦汉三国六朝文·全梁文》卷二十，北京：中华书局，1958年，第3067-3068页。
32 欧阳澈：《上皇帝书》，见曾枣庄、刘琳主编：《全宋文》第182册，上海：上海辞书出版社，合肥：安徽教育出版社，2006年，第365-387页。
33 张：《朝野佥载》，北京：中华书局，1979年。
34 洪迈：《容斋随笔·三笔》，北京：中华书局，2005年。
35 王钦若、杨亿、孙奭等编：《册府元龟》，周勋初等校订，南京：凤凰出版社，2006年。
36 唐圭璋等校点：《唐宋人选唐宋词》，上海：上海古籍出版社，2004年。
37 王灼：《碧鸡漫志》，见唐圭璋编：《词话丛编》第1册，北京：中华书局，2005年。
38 沈义父：《乐府指迷笺释》，蔡嵩云笺释，北京：人民文学出版社，2018年。
39 张炎：《词源注》，北京：人民文学出版社，2018年。
40 苏轼：《苏轼文集》，北京：中华书局，1986年。
41 曾丰：《〈知稼翁词〉序》，见曾枣庄主编：《宋代序跋全编》第2册，济南：齐鲁书社，2015年，第1110-1111页。
42 陈振孙：《直斋书录解题》，上海：上海古籍出版社，1987年。
43 房日晰、房向莉：《康与之词刍议》，《词学》2020年第2期，第72-84页。
44 杨慎：《词品》，见唐圭璋编：《词话丛编》第1册，北京：中华书局，2005年。
45 黄溥：《诗学权舆》，见四库全书存目丛书编纂委员会编：《四库全书存目丛书》集部第292册，济南：齐鲁书社，1997年。
46 陈霆：《渚山堂词话》，见唐圭璋编：《词话丛编》第1册，北京：中华书局，2005年。
47 李濂：《李濂词话》，见邓子勉编：《明词话全编》第2册，南京：凤凰出版社，2012年。
48 唐锦：《唐锦词话》，见唐圭璋编：《明词话全编》第1册，南京：凤凰出版社，2012年。
49 王昶：《春融堂集》，陈明洁、朱惠国、裴风顺点校，上海：上海文化出版社，2013年。
50 梁启超：《中国近三百年学术史》（校订本），俞国林校，北京：中华书局，2020年。
51 赵尔巽：《清史稿》，北京：中华书局，1977年。
52 戴震：《戴震文集》，北京：中华书局，1980年。
53 戈载：《词林正韵》，上海：上海古籍出版社，1981年。
54 顾广圻：《顾千里集》，王欣夫辑，北京：中华书局，2007年。
55 程千帆等编：《全清词·顺康卷》，北京：中华书局，2002年。
56 谭献：《复堂词话》，见唐圭璋编：《词话丛编》第4册，北京：中华书局，2005年。
57 朱惠国：《中国近世词学思想史》，上海：上海古籍出版社，2005年。
58 章太炎：《訄书》，见《章太炎全集》第3册，上海：上海人民出版社，2018年。
59 蔡长林：《从文士到经生——考据学风潮下的常州学派》，台北：“中研院”中国文哲研究所，2010年。