Abstract：Since the 18th National Congress of the Communist Party of China, China’s economic development has entered a new stage. Under the circumstances, the goal of “Common Prosperity” has attracted more and more attention over the past several years. China’s long-term implementation of urban-biased policies led to a huge gap between urban and rural areas for a long time and hindered the realization of common prosperity. The report of the 19th National Congress of the Communist Party of China put forward a new concept of “Integrated Urban-Rural Development” to solve the problem of unbalanced development between urban and rural areas. This study points out that integrated urban-rural development is an important path to achieve the goal of common prosperity due to the huge gap between urban and rural areas. Besides, narrowing the gap between urban and rural areas in various dimensions is also the main direction of common prosperity. Firstly, the study illustrates that through integrated urban-rural development, it is possible to (1) reduce the income gap between urban and rural areas to promote the realization of common prosperity in the material dimension; (2) facilitate the equal supply of basic public services between urban and rural areas to promote the realization of common prosperity in the dimension of rights; (3) balance urban and rural development capabilities to promote the realization of common prosperity in the dimension of development opportunities; (4) coordinate the construction of urban-rural spiritual civilization to promote the realization of common prosperity in the spiritual dimension; (5) stimulate the integration between urban and rural ecological environment to promote the realization of common prosperity in the ecological dimension. In addition, after sorting out the international experience of integrated urban-rural development, the study finds that major developed countries and some emerging countries have established (1) an urban-rural economic linkage mechanism of in-depth integration and benefit sharing; (2) an urban-rural ecological environment linkage mechanism of overall planning and sustainable development; (3) an urban-rural public service linkage mechanism of urban-rural equivalent and comprehensive coverage. Aiming at the goals of common prosperity concerning farmers’ rights, industrial development, education equity and ecological value conversion, the paper combines the opinions of the experts participating in the “Integrated Urban-Rural Development and Common Prosperity” academic seminar with literature to propose seven policy paths for integrated urban-rural development: (1) promoting urban-rural economic integration by achieving equal rights to urban and rural development; (2) taking advantage of industrial clusters development model to promote urban-rural economic integration; (3) improving the income distribution system to promote urban-rural economic integration; (4) promoting the ecological integration between urban and rural areas with the realization of ecological products value; (5) facilitating the integration of urban and rural public services with the cultivation of early childhood human capital; (6) stimulating the integration of urban and rural public services with the realization of education equity; (7) advancing the integration of urban and rural public services with the development model of “inter-village integration”. The paper reveals that urban-rural integration requires further institutional reform, as well as the different varieties of policies aiming at special demands. Therefore, grassroots innovation and careful consideration of the differences across different groups and different regions could be fully guaranteed to achieve common prosperity.
陈志钢, 茅锐, 张云飞. 城乡融合发展与共同富裕：内涵、国际经验与实现路径[J]. 浙江大学学报(人文社会科学版), 2022, 52(7): 68-78.
Chen Kevin, Mao Rui, Zhang Yunfei. Integrated Urban-Rural Development and Common Prosperity: Connotation, International Experience and Implementation Path. JOURNAL OF ZHEJIANG UNIVERSITY, 2022, 52(7): 68-78.
李实、陈基平、滕阳川： 《共同富裕路上的乡村振兴：问题、挑战与建议》，《兰州大学学报（社会科学版）》2021年第3期，第37-46页。2 Liu Y. & Li Y.， “Revitalize the world’s countryside，” Nature， Vol. 548， No. 7667 （2017）， pp. 275-277.3 World Bank， “Poverty and shared prosperity 2016： taking on inequality，” https：//www.worldbank.org/en/publication/poverty-and-shared-prosperity-2016， 2021-11-29.4 Kanbur R. & Zhang X.， “Fifty years of regional inequality in China： a journey through central planning， reform， and openness，” Review of Development Economics， Vol. 9， No. 1 （2005）， pp. 87-106.5 茅锐、林显一： 《在乡村振兴中促进城乡融合发展——来自主要发达国家的经验启示》，《国际经济评论》2022年第1期，第155-173，8页。6 王颂吉、魏后凯： 《城乡融合发展视角下的乡村振兴战略：提出背景与内在逻辑》，《农村经济》2019年第1期，第1-7页。7 陈志钢、周云逸、樊胜根： 《全球视角下的乡村振兴思考》，《农业经济问题》2020年第2期，第87-96页。8 胡鞍钢、周绍杰： 《2035中国：迈向共同富裕》，《北京工业大学学报（社会科学版）》2022年第1期，第1-22页。9 刘培林、钱滔、黄先海等： 《共同富裕的内涵、实现路径与测度方法》，《管理世界》2021年第8期，第117-129页。10 邓小平： 《在武昌、深圳、珠海、上海等地的谈话要点》，见《邓小平文选》第3卷，北京：人民出版社，1993年，第370-383页。11 江泽民： 《正确处理社会主义现代化建设中的若干重大关系》，见《江泽民文选》第1卷，北京：人民出版社，2006年，第460-475页。12 胡锦涛： 《高举中国特色社会主义伟大旗帜，为夺取全面建设小康社会新胜利而奋斗》，见《胡锦涛文选》第2卷，北京：人民出版社，2016年，第612-658页。13 习近平： 《扎实推动共同富裕》，《求是》2021年第20期，第4-8页。14 陈丽君、郁建兴、徐铱娜： 《共同富裕指数模型的构建》，《治理研究》2021年第4期，第5-16页。15 张来明、李建伟： 《促进共同富裕的内涵、战略目标与政策措施》，《改革》2021年第9期，第16-33页。16 何仁伟： 《城乡融合与乡村振兴：理论探讨、机理阐释与实现路径》，《地理研究》2018年第11期，第2127-2140页。17 魏后凯： 《深刻把握城乡融合发展的本质内涵》，《中国农村经济》2020年第6期，第5-8页。18 IFPRI， “Global food policy report 2019”， https：//www.ifpri.org/publication/2019-global-food-policy-report， 2021-11-29.19 Steiner A. & Fan S.， “Rural revitalization： tapping into new opportunities”， https：//www.ifpri.org/publication/rural-revitalization-tapping-new-opportunities， 2021-11-29.20 Chen K.， Mao R. & Zhou Y.， “Rurbanomics for common prosperity： new approach to integrated urban-rural development”， https：//doi.org/10.1108/CAER-12-2021-0256， 2021-11-29.21 陈志钢、吴国宝、毕洁颖： 《从乡村到城乡统筹：2020年后中国扶贫愿景和战略重点》，北京：社会科学文献出版社，2019年。22 盛广耀： 《中国城乡基础设施与公共服务的差异和提升》，《区域经济评论》2020年第4期，第52-59页。23 姚洋： 《共同富裕，须精准提高民众收入能力》，《北京日报》2021年10月18日，第10版。24 龙晓柏、龚建文： 《英美乡村演变特征、政策及对我国乡村振兴的启示》，《江西社会科学》2018年第4期，第216-224页。25 Naoko M. & Hiroko A.， “Japan： super-aging society preparing for the future，” The Gerontologist， Vol. 4， No. 51 （2011）， pp. 425-432.26 石敏俊： 《生态产品价值的实现路径与机制设计》，《环境经济研究》2021年第2期，第1-6页。
2022, Vol. 52 
