浙江大学学报(人文社会科学版)
 
   2025年5月12日 星期一   首页 |  期刊介绍 |  编委会 |  投稿指南 |  信息服务 |  期刊订阅 |  联系我们 |  预印本过刊 |  浙江省高校学报研究会栏目 |  留言板 |  English Version
浙江大学学报(人文社会科学版)  2022, Vol. 52 Issue (1): 6-21    DOI: 10.3785/j.issn.1008-942X.CN33-6000/C.2021.10.255
主题栏目:共同富裕笔谈 最新目录| 下期目录| 过刊浏览| 高级检索 |
“共同富裕”主题笔谈
李实1, 陈宗胜2, 史晋川3, 刘同舫4, 何文炯1
1.浙江大学 公共管理学院,浙江 杭州 310058
2.南开大学 中国财富经济研究院,天津 300071
3.浙江大学 经济学院,浙江 杭州 310058
4.浙江大学 马克思主义学院,浙江 杭州 310058
A Conversation by Writing on the Theme of “Common Prosperity”
Li Shi1, Chen Zongsheng2, Shi Jinchuan3, Liu Tongfang4, He Wenjiong1
1.School of Public Affairs, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China
2.China Institute of Wealth and Economics, Nankai University, Tianjin 310071, China
3.School of Economics, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China
4.School of Marxism, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China

全文: PDF (768 KB)  
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 扎实推进共同富裕的关键是“提低”,即提高底层人群的收入、财产水平及享有的社会保障和公共服务水平,而其中最重要的是不断提高他们的收入水平。我国公有制经济为主体的基本经济制度要求分配制度以按劳分配为主体,故共同富裕的主要途径是勤劳致富。同时,与公有主体经济并存的各种非公有制经济是中国特色社会主义的显著优势,是推动共同富裕的重要力量。实现共同富裕要正确处理效率与公平的关系,既要把蛋糕做大,又要把蛋糕分好;政府通过再分配促进共同富裕的重点应该是收入流量的再分配,并重视居民可支配收入的提高。共同富裕是对生产力发展和所有制关系的非正义后果的矫正,通过大力解放和发展生产力为实现人类解放奠定物质基础。健全社会保障制度是扎实推进共同富裕的实质性行动。优化完善当前社会保障制度的关键是要改变对社会保障权益的认知。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入我的书架
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
李实
陈宗胜
史晋川
刘同舫
何文炯
关键词 共同富裕低收入人群中等收入人群私有经济帕累托改进卡尔多—希克斯改进历史唯物主义社会保障    
Abstract:Common prosperity is an essential requirement of socialism, and an important characteristic of Chinese modernization. Since the 18th National Party Congress, the Party has placed more emphasis on gradually realizing common prosperity for everyone. It has adopted effective measures to improve the people’s wellbeing, fight against poverty and build up a moderately prosperous society in all aspects. This creates good conditions for promoting common prosperity. This journal organizes five articles to discuss the theory of common prosperity from different perspectives. Li Shi believes that the key to steadily promoting common prosperity is to “raise the low levels”, which means raising the levels of income, property, social security and public services of the bottom groups, among which the most important is to constantly improve their income level. Chen Zongsheng holds that, as the basic system of keeping public economy in a dominant position requires distribution on the basis of labor, the main road to achieving common prosperity is working hard. At the same time, the coexistence of public economy and various non-public economies is a distinctive advantage of socialism with Chinese characteristics and an important force to promote common prosperity. It is believed by Shi Jinchuan that in order to realize common prosperity the relationship between efficiency and fairness should be dealt with properly through enlarging the pie and distributing it fairly. To promote common prosperity with redistribution, the government should focus on the redistribution of the income flow and the augmentation of people’s disposable income. Liu Tongfang, from the perspective of historical materialism, believes that common prosperity is to correct injustice in the development of the productive forces and the relationship of diverse forms of ownership, and to lay a solid material foundation for the welfare of the people by vigorously unleashing and developing the productive forces. He Wenjiong, based on the three changes of social security rights and interests, i.e. from labor rights and interests to citizen rights and interests, from employers’ rights and interests to all workers’ rights and interests, from the household registered population’s rights and interest to the resident population’s rights and interests, proposes that improving the social security system is a realistic way to promote common prosperity. We hope to make an explanation on common prosperity from different perspectives through this conversation by writing in order to clarify some ambiguous understanding and to promote academic contention and progress.
Key wordscommon prosperity    low-income population    middle-income population    private economy    Pareto improvement    Kaldor-Hicks improvement    historical materialism    social security   
收稿日期: 2021-10-25     
作者简介: 李实(https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5679-4589),男,浙江大学公共管理学院教授,主要从事收入分配、公共政策、劳动力市场研究;;陈宗胜(https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9336-8634),男,南开大学中国财富经济研究院教授,主要从事收入分配、经济体制改革研究;;史晋川(https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0265-3211),男,浙江大学经济学院教授,主要从事宏观经济学、法律经济学等研究;;刘同舫(https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9083-4994),男,浙江大学马克思主义学院教授,主要从事马克思主义基本原理研究;;何文炯(https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2201-7722),男,浙江大学公共管理学院教授,主要从事社会保障、保险精算和风险管理研;
引用本文:   
李实, 陈宗胜, 史晋川, 刘同舫, 何文炯. “共同富裕”主题笔谈[J]. 浙江大学学报(人文社会科学版), 2022, 52(1): 6-21. Li Shi, Chen Zongsheng, Shi Jinchuan, Liu Tongfang, He Wenjiong. A Conversation by Writing on the Theme of “Common Prosperity”. JOURNAL OF ZHEJIANG UNIVERSITY, 2022, 52(1): 6-21.
链接本文:  
https://www.zjujournals.com/soc/CN/10.3785/j.issn.1008-942X.CN33-6000/C.2021.10.255     或     https://www.zjujournals.com/soc/CN/Y2022/V52/I1/6
发表一流的成果,传播一流的发现,提供一流的新知

浙ICP备14002560号-5
版权所有 © 2009 浙江大学学报(人文社会科学版)    浙ICP备05074421号
地址:杭州市天目山路148号 邮编:310028 电话:0571-88273210 88925616 E-mail:zdxb_w@zju.edu.cn
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发  技术支持:support@magtech.com.cn