Abstract：The theoretical paradigm of Marxist aesthetics represents a global aesthetic framework that diverges from the romantic aesthetic tradition, rejecting Eurocentrism as its foundational principle. This paradigm embodies profound theoretical aspirations and practical significance within the field of aesthetic studies. Throughout its historical development, Marxist aesthetics has undergone several pivotal paradigm shifts along a linear historical trajectory, while simultaneously demonstrating spatial and formal intersections across different geographical contexts. In the context of rapid modernization and globalization, these paradigm shifts have manifested in diverse aspects, particularly in aesthetic modernity and fundamental aesthetic propositions. Notably, Chinese Marxist aesthetics has emerged as a significant component, contributing to the formation of a complex problematics within the broader domain of Marxist aesthetic theory. This evolution reflects both the theoretical depth and practical relevance of Marxist aesthetics in addressing contemporary aesthetic challenges.Building upon this theoretical foundation, this article systematically investigates three pivotal theoretical paradigms in the historical evolution of Marxist aesthetics: the historical materialist approach to literature and art, the anthropological paradigm shift, and the paradigm shift centered on aesthetic ideology. Although these elements do not encompass the complete spectrum of theoretical paradigms in Marxist aesthetics, they represent significant paradigm shifts that emerged within specific historical contexts. These developments not only inherit but also advance the Marxist aesthetic tradition, demonstrating its dynamic and evolving nature. For the development of Chinese Marxist aesthetics, this study provides significant methodological insights, particularly in offering an aesthetic-historical perspective for interpreting the Marxist aesthetic discourse system.Different from Western aesthetics, which excels in abstract speculation and metaphysical theoretical discourse, Chinese Marxist aesthetics unfolds in tandem with the practice of socialism with Chinese characteristics. The distinctive features of Chinese Marxist aesthetics lie in its pronounced practical orientation and empirical approach, stemming from the integration of Marxist fundamental theories with Chinese aesthetic experiences and artistic practices. Consequently, the formation of the aesthetic paradigm in China has progressed concurrently with the practical development of socialism with Chinese characteristics. To reflect on the Chinese Marxist aesthetic paradigm within the contemporary cultural context, it is imperative to examine its unique contributions from a global aesthetic perspective, while integrating China’s rich aesthetic experiences and theoretical perspectives into the historical process of globalization.In conclusion, Marxist aesthetics has demonstrated the potential for a more rational and promising future for humanity. It is poised to play an increasingly significant role in guiding values within contemporary and future societal development. In the context of China’ pursuit of socialism with Chinese characteristics, Chinese Marxist aesthetics embodies both the orientation and historical imperatives for a better world. Within this framework, the Chinese Marxist aesthetic paradigm represents an advanced aesthetic form that is globally oriented and future-focused.
何信玉. 马克思主义美学的范式转换及其方法论启示[J]. 浙江大学学报(人文社会科学版), 2025, 55(7): 45-55.
He Xinyu. Paradigm Shift of Marxist Aesthetics and Its Methodological Enlightenment. JOURNAL OF ZHEJIANG UNIVERSITY, 2025, 55(7): 45-55.
2025, Vol. 55 
