浙江大学学报(人文社会科学版)
 
   2025年5月1日 星期四   首页 |  期刊介绍 |  编委会 |  投稿指南 |  信息服务 |  期刊订阅 |  联系我们 |  预印本过刊 |  浙江省高校学报研究会栏目 |  留言板 |  English Version
浙江大学学报(人文社会科学版)  2022, Vol. 52 Issue (10): 31-46    DOI: 10.3785/j.issn.1008-942X.CN33-6000/C.2022.01.136
主题栏目:共同富裕研究 最新目录| 下期目录| 过刊浏览| 高级检索 |
农户分化对合作社长效减贫效应的影响与政策启示
朋文欢1, 黄祖辉2, 傅琳琳3
1.宁波大学 商学院,浙江 宁波 315211
2.浙江大学 中国农村发展研究院,浙江 杭州 310058
3.浙江省农业科学院 农村发展研究所,浙江 杭州 310021
Impact of Rural-household Differentiation on Poverty Alleviation Effect of Farmer Cooperatives and Its Policy Implications
Peng Wenhuan1, Huang Zuhui2, Fu Linlin3
1.Business School, Ningbo University, Ningbo 315211, China
2.China Academy for Rural Development, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China
3.Institute of Rural Development, Zhejiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Hangzhou 310021, China

全文: PDF (1771 KB)   RICH HTML
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 客观评价农民合作社在精准扶贫、精准脱贫中的贡献,将为后脱贫时代研判农民合作社带动农户持续增收、稳定脱贫的潜力提供依据。均衡分析结果表明:农民职业身份转变、要素禀赋分化抑制了农户寻求组织服务的动机,并刺激了合作社设置门槛实施“掐尖”策略,这制约了弱势农户的组织服务可得性,并最终导致组织贫困治理功能失灵。中国农村家庭追踪调查(CRHPS)和双重差分模型的证据显示,农民合作社的减贫效应总体上不显著,但也表现出明显差异。合作社对兼业程度较低,尤其是纯农户有显著的减贫效果;在农地集中程度较低、农户要素禀赋相对均质的村庄,合作社的减贫效果更加突出,而农地高度集中明显削弱了组织的减贫效果。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入我的书架
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
朋文欢
黄祖辉
傅琳琳
关键词 农民合作社贫困治理农户分化服务可得性    
Abstract:By the end of October 2019, there were more than 2.2 million registered farmer cooperatives in China. An objective evaluation of their contribution to targeted poverty alleviation in rural China is of great necessity, as it provides important references for how cooperatives can help alleviate poverty and promote farmers’ income in the “post poverty alleviation era”. Against China’s background of rural-household differentiation, this paper examines the barriers faced by cooperatives to participate in rural poverty governance from the perspective of organizational service availability. The result of our equilibrium analysis shows that the transition of farmers’ professional identity, and hence the differentiation of their factor endowment, not only discourages vulnerable farmers from seeking organizational service but also encourages cooperatives to adopt the “cream-skimming” strategy. As a result, the service availability for vulnerable rural households is compromised, eventually leading to cooperatives’ failure in poverty governance.This paper uses the three-phase farmer panel tracking data from 2015 to 2019 of the China Rural Household Panel Survey (CRHPS) and adopts the time-varying DID model to evaluate cooperatives’ contribution to and the effect of rural-household differentiation on poverty alleviation. The following findings are reported: (1) the poverty alleviation effect of cooperatives is not significant overall, which is supported by a series of robustness checks; (2) there is a great disparity in cooperatives’ poverty alleviation effect across farmers and villages. Specifically, the poverty alleviation effect is significant for full-time farmers, which is more the case for villages with a low concentration of farmland and a more equal distribution of factor endowment, while the effect is compromised in villages where farmland is highly concentrated. The above empirical findings corroborate the result of the equilibrium analysis, i.e. the rapid transition of farmers’ professional identity and the differentiation of their factor endowment are major causes of cooperatives’ failure in poverty governance.This paper has the following improvements compared to previous studies. First, unlike existing studies that judged whether farmers were “treated” based on “whether they joined a cooperative”, this paper takes organizational service availability as the criterion for the judgment. It not only factors in both the direct effect on cooperative members and the spill-over effect on non-members but also overcomes the interference of cooperatives’ selective membership in the result. Moreover, this paper adopts “whether a village has cooperatives” as the proxy variable for organizational service availability, which provides methodological references for future empirical studies. Second, previous studies interpreted the reasons behind cooperatives’ failure in poverty governance only from the perspective of cooperatives, while this paper adds the new perspective of farmers by incorporating the background of rural-household differentiation.
Key wordsfarmer cooperatives    poverty governance    rural-household differentiation    service availability   
收稿日期: 2022-01-13     
基金资助:浙江省哲学社会科学规划课题(19NDJC109YB);教育部人文社科项目(19YJC790097);浙江省基础公益研究计划项目(LY20G030005);国家自科基金项目(71903178)
作者简介: 1.朋文欢(https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7266-5165),男,宁波大学商学院讲师,管理学博士,主要从事农村贫困、农业产业组织等研究;2;黄祖辉(https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0032-899X),男,浙江大学中国农村发展研究院教授,博士生导师,主要从事农业经济与农村发展、产业组织与制度安排等研究;3;傅琳琳(https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3178-3848)(通信作者),女,浙江省农业科学院农村发展研究所助理研究员,管理学博士,主要从事农业产业组织研究;
引用本文:   
朋文欢, 黄祖辉, 傅琳琳. 农户分化对合作社长效减贫效应的影响与政策启示[J]. 浙江大学学报(人文社会科学版), 2022, 52(10): 31-46. Peng Wenhuan, Huang Zuhui, Fu Linlin. Impact of Rural-household Differentiation on Poverty Alleviation Effect of Farmer Cooperatives and Its Policy Implications. JOURNAL OF ZHEJIANG UNIVERSITY, 2022, 52(10): 31-46.
链接本文:  
https://www.zjujournals.com/soc/CN/10.3785/j.issn.1008-942X.CN33-6000/C.2022.01.136     或     https://www.zjujournals.com/soc/CN/Y2022/V52/I10/31
发表一流的成果,传播一流的发现,提供一流的新知

浙ICP备14002560号-5
版权所有 © 2009 浙江大学学报(人文社会科学版)    浙ICP备05074421号
地址:杭州市天目山路148号 邮编:310028 电话:0571-88273210 88925616 E-mail:zdxb_w@zju.edu.cn
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发  技术支持:support@magtech.com.cn