浙江大学学报(人文社会科学版)
 
   2025年4月1日 星期二   首页 |  期刊介绍 |  编委会 |  投稿指南 |  信息服务 |  期刊订阅 |  联系我们 |  预印本过刊 |  浙江省高校学报研究会栏目 |  留言板 |  English Version
浙江大学学报(人文社会科学版)
在线优先出版论文 最新目录| 下期目录| 过刊浏览| 高级检索 |
人工智能对国际法的挑战及其应对
赵骏 李婉贞
The Challenges of Artificial Intelligence on International Law and Reaction
Zhao Jun Li Wanzhen

全文: PDF (1764 KB)   RICH HTML
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 

人工智能技术的迅猛发展使国际交往更加便利和频繁,但也对现有国际法律体系提出了新的挑战。国际法基本原则中的国家主权原则、国家责任原则以及国际法具体领域中的国际法居民制度、国际人道法、国际刑法、国际知识产权法、国际人权法、国际海洋法与国际海事法等,都受到了人工智能技术发展的影响,面临严峻的挑战。作为维护国际和平、促进国际社会共同发展的国际法,应当与时俱进,积极应对国际智能社会的各种挑战。为此,国家之间应当加强合作,以人工智能的安全使用为目标,通过制定国际软法、缔结多边条约、设立专门性国际机构等方式,引导人工智能技术健康发展,解决新科技带来的国际新问题。

服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入我的书架
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
赵骏 李婉贞
关键词 人工智能法律规制国际软法多边条约    
Abstract

The rapid development of artificial intelligence (AI) technology has made international communication more convenient and frequent. However, it also imposes new challenges on the current international legal system. First, the development of AI technology will challenge some basic principles of international law, such as the principle of sovereignty and the principle of state responsibility. The upcoming AI era might cause serious problems of algorithm monopoly and data monopoly, and even form the AI hegemony, which in turn will seriously threaten a nation’s sovereignty. As a result, it is necessary to put forward the concept of AI sovereignty to prevent the infringement of AI technological hegemony on national sovereignty. In terms of state responsibility, when acts of AI violate a state’s international obligations, these acts cannot be directly attributed to the state but to an individual or entity representing the state as the first step to establish state responsibility. This allows the state to use AI’s completely autonomous behavior to exempt state responsibility. Second, the development of AI technology also challenges many specific fields of international law, including the resident system of international law, international humanitarian law, international criminal law, international intellectual property law, international human rights law, international law of the sea, and international maritime law, etc. AI will continue to update its capacity of intelligence. AI acquiring legal personality also raises the questions as to whether the resident system applies to AI and how to apply it. These concerns require the active response of international law. At the same time, when AI becomes the main creator and defender of human interests, it may also need to be granted some human rights. However, the subjects of international human rights law are still limited to humans. At present, AI weapon systems are gradually getting out of human control. Its ability of decision-making, however, is difficult to meet the requirements of the principles of proportionality and attack prevention. When AI acts on behalf of individuals to commit acts of genocide and endanger humanity, new issues will arise, such as the identification of responsible subjects and methods of attribution. In addition, the application of AI technology has led to the invention of unmanned ships. Considering their special nature and potential danger, coastal states should be entitled to have some special jurisdiction over unmanned ships. In terms of marine compensation, accidents caused by completely autonomous ships will also trigger new issues on responsibility. It is worth noting that some objects generated by AI have important value and innovativeness, and should be protected by intellectual property law. However, there is no provision for this protection in international intellectual property law. In this respect, it is particularly important to properly manage the relationship between the development of AI technology and international law. States should strengthen cooperation with the goal of safe application of AI to guide the healthy development of AI technology. Although AI technology is at its early stage of development in many countries, the issue of AI security cannot be ignored. Its development thus needs to be regulated effectively. Because of this necessity, we may take the lead in formulating an international soft law to solve technical problems and certain ethical problems. Moreover, in order to deal effectively with new social problems and deep-level ethical problems, it is also necessary to develop a global risk prevention and control mechanism in the field which requires a stronger obligation through modifying multilateral international rules and developing new multilateral treaties. Meanwhile, in order to respond to the opportunities and challenges imposed by artificial intelligence on a global scale, it is advisable to set up AI-specific international institutions, which aims to focus on and formulate the rules of AI industry, to supervise the development and use of AI, and to promote the integration between the development of artificial intelligence and the existing international legal system.

Key wordsartificial intelligence    legal regulation    international soft law    multilateral treaty   
    
引用本文:   
赵骏 李婉贞. 人工智能对国际法的挑战及其应对[J]. 浙江大学学报(人文社会科学版), 2020, 6(2): 10-. Zhao Jun Li Wanzhen. The Challenges of Artificial Intelligence on International Law and Reaction. JOURNAL OF ZHEJIANG UNIVERSITY, 2020, 6(2): 10-.
链接本文:  
https://www.zjujournals.com/soc/CN/     或     https://www.zjujournals.com/soc/CN/Y2020/V6/I2/10
发表一流的成果,传播一流的发现,提供一流的新知

浙ICP备14002560号-5
版权所有 © 2009 浙江大学学报(人文社会科学版)    浙ICP备05074421号
地址:杭州市天目山路148号 邮编:310028 电话:0571-88273210 88925616 E-mail:zdxb_w@zju.edu.cn
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发  技术支持:support@magtech.com.cn