Abstract：Modern anthologies and works on literary genres have broken through the traditional literary concepts since the late Qing Dynasty, extending the scope of “Wen” from “Ji” (miscellaneous works) to “Sibu”(the Four Categories in ancient China). In Zeng Guofan’s Miscellaneous Selections from Classics, Histories and Philosophical Works, the prefaces and postfaces of the “Writings” section mainly feature selected texts such as Zhouyi: Wenyan, Xici, and Liji:Guanyi. Although it did not regard the style of “Zhuan Zhu” (commentary and annotation) as an independent literary genre, Wang Baoxin and Gao Buying, influenced by the literary classification system of Miscellaneous Selections from Classics, Histories and Philosophical Works, both considered the commentary and annotation as an independent literary style.They categorized it under the broader categories, such as the “Writings” section or the “Arguments and Discussions” section, along with the related genres such as argumentative writing, prefaces, and postscripts. However, in terms of specific research methods, it should not limit the study to purely conceptual research. Instead, the stylistic characteristics of commentary and annotation should be discussed from both structural form and stylistic function of the text. By comparing annotations with related literary styles, it is possible to a certain extent to “restore” the rationale behind the modern scholars’ identification of annotations as a literary genre. “Zhuan Zhu” (commentary and annotation) includes not only “Zhuan” that is relatively independent from classical texts, and “Zhu” that is attached to classical texts, but also “explanatory essays” in the name of “Du” (reading), “Yi” (discussing), “Jie” (interpreting), “Bian” (distinguishing) and other prefaces, postscripts and argumentative proses since Tang and Song dynasties. As a typical exegetic text, it is inevitable that the research on the stylistic characteristics of commentary should be compared with similar texts such as preface, postscript and argumentation. On the one hand, Wenyan of the Book of Changes and Xici are relatively independent from the main text, and their expression modes and structural features are in some way analogous to the prefaces of some historical and philosophical works, such as Sima Qian’s “Taishi Gong Zixu” (Preface to the Records of the Grand Historian). These prefaces, which are characterized by “proper order”, are the closest examples to annotations and commentaries. On the other hand, although the “explanatory essays” in Tang and Song classical proses tended to focus on the philosophical and doctrinal aspects rather than sentence interpretation and etymology, heir subject matter and specific argumentative approaches often reflect a subjective intention to uphold the classics, or they are written with a tendency to elaborate on a topic by taking liberties with the original text. or to convey their political ideas, thus deviating from the original texts and tended to be superficial. In this sense, the “explanatory essays” are closer to general argumentative essays. Jiao Xun’s statement of “no text is more important than the commentary” represents a typical view in the discussion among scholars of the Qian-Jia era regarding whether textual research and commentaries belong to the category of “wen”. This view also implies a value judgment on what constitutes the ideal “explanatory essays”: Jiao Xun not only regarded the “explanatory essays” as the “texts for all ages”, pointing out its value above that of “the texts for imperial examinations” and “the texts for social interactions”, but also upheld the writing standard and ideal style based on “yi jing” (refined ideas) and “shi shi” (factual accuracy), providing a possible way for classical proses to achieve the integration of principles, textual research, and literary style. This is another important contribution that classical studies have made to classical Chinese literary theory, beyond the propositions of “text as a vehicle for the Dao” and “text as the scripture” in the study of classics.
伏煦. 传注的文体特性与焦循“文莫重于注经”说[J]. 浙江大学学报(人文社会科学版), 2025, 55(1): 148-160.
Fu Xu. The Stylistic Features of Zhuan Zhu and Jiao Xun’s Statement of “No Text Is More Important than the Commentary”. JOURNAL OF ZHEJIANG UNIVERSITY, 2025, 55(1): 148-160.
2025, Vol. 55 
