浙江大学学报(人文社会科学版)
 
   2025年5月4日 星期日   首页 |  期刊介绍 |  编委会 |  投稿指南 |  信息服务 |  期刊订阅 |  联系我们 |  预印本过刊 |  浙江省高校学报研究会栏目 |  留言板 |  English Version
浙江大学学报(人文社会科学版)  2024, Vol. 54 Issue (9): 50-62    DOI: 10.3785/j.issn.1008-942X.CN33-6000/C.2023.11.021
主题栏目:马克思主义研究 最新目录| 下期目录| 过刊浏览| 高级检索 |
马克思恩格斯的文明理论
顾青青1, 高力克2
1.杭州师范大学 马克思主义学院,浙江 杭州 311121
2.浙江大学 传媒与国际文化学院,浙江 杭州 310058
Marx and Engels’ Theory of Civilization
Gu Qingqing1, Gao Like2
1.School of Marxism, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou 311121, China
2.College of Media and International Culture, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China

全文: PDF (763 KB)   RICH HTML
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 马克思恩格斯批判地继承了文明论的合理内核,形成了历史唯物主义文明理论。马克思恩格斯以生产力和分工为基础,从经济学视角阐释了人类社会由农业社会到工业社会的文明演进过程,并以生产方式的演变揭示了资产阶级文明的历史进步性和历史过渡性,从资本主义矛盾运动中预见了社会主义革命的趋势,其共产主义的未来视野否定了文明等级论以现代资产阶级文明为完美典范的观点。马克思恩格斯以历史辩证法的观点揭示了现代资产阶级社会的“文明中的野蛮”以及历史与道德的二律背反,并阐明了西方殖民主义在非西方殖民地的野蛮掠夺和文明传播的辩证法,从而破除了“文明—野蛮”二元对立模式和“西方文明—非西方野蛮”的意识形态偏见。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入我的书架
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
顾青青
高力克
关键词 马克思恩格斯文明野蛮历史唯物主义辩证法    
Abstract:Marx and Engels critically inherited the reasonable core of civilization theory and developed the civilization theory of historical materialism. Based on productivity and division of labor, Marx and Engels explained the evolution process of human society from an agricultural society to an industrial society based on the perspective of economics and revealed the historical progress and historical transition of bourgeois civilization from the evolution of production mode. Then they foresaw the trend of socialist revolution from the contradictory movement of capitalism, and their future vision of communism denied the view that the theory on civilization hierarchy took modern bourgeois civilization as a perfect model. Meanwhile, Marx and Engels revealed the “barbarism in the civilization” of contemporary bourgeois society and the contradiction between history and morality through the viewpoint of historical dialectics. They further elucidated the dialectics of barbaric plunder and civilization dissemination of Western colonialism in non-Western colonies, thus eliminating the binary opposition mode of “civilization versus barbarism” and the ideological prejudgment of “Western civilization and non-Western barbarism”.Marx and Engels’ theory of civilization takes the mode of production as the axis and human freedom as the latitude. Human freedom is the measure of civilization progress, as manifested in Marx and Engels’ comprehensive critique of capitalist society: economically, in terms of labor enslavement and alienated labor; politically, in the bourgeois “domination of man”; and psychologically, in the “dependence on materials”. Additionally, Marx and Engels, based on their criticism of bourgeois civilization hierarchy, envisioned the future civilization prospects of liberation in communist society. The progress of civilization ultimately lies in humanity’s liberation from “dependence on man” and “dependence on materials” in economic, political, and psychological aspects. The Marxist ideal of “freedom” is embodied in The Communist Manifesto as the “union of free individuals in the communist society”. This critical and constructive dialectical theory of civilization not only dismantles the 19th-century myth of “civilization” with Western modern society as the model but also avoids the “Greek nostalgia” trap of anti-civilization thought seen in Rousseau’s and Nietzsche’s left and right wing critiques of civilization, displaying the unique and enduring intellectual charm of historical materialism.The issue of civilization is a significant theoretical problem in social theory and historical research, especially for China in its modernization process. This paper places the study of Marx and Engels’ theory of civilization within the theoretical context of the evolution of 19th-century civilization discourse, exploring the important ideological significance of Marx and Engels’ theory of civilization in surpassing bourgeois civilization discourse and deepening historical materialism theory. Simultaneously, by examining Marx and Engels’ works from the early The Communist Manifesto to the later works such as Abstract of Morgan’s Book on Ancient Societies and The Origin of the Family, Private Property and the State, this paper delves into the system and development of Marx and Engels’ theory of civilization, not only deepening the study of Marxist historical philosophy and social theory but also advancing the study of civilization theory. In practical application, China’s modernization path has evolved from the “Four Modernizations” of industry, agriculture, national defense, and science and technology to a modernization aiming at wealth, strength, democracy, and civilization. Civilization has become the overall goal of China’s modernization. Studying Marxist theory of civilization can provide theoretical guidance and intellectual inspiration for China’s civilization progress and modernization endeavor.
Key wordsMarx    Engels    civilization    barbarous    historical materialism    dialectics   
收稿日期: 2023-11-02     
基金资助:国家社会科学基金一般项目(21CKS032)
作者简介: 顾青青(https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7151-504X),女,杭州师范大学马克思主义学院副教授,硕士生导师,法学博士,主要从事马克思主义理论研究;;高力克(https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0888-0738),男,浙江大学传媒与国际文化学院教授,博士生导师,主要从事中国现代思想史研究;
引用本文:   
顾青青, 高力克. 马克思恩格斯的文明理论[J]. 浙江大学学报(人文社会科学版), 2024, 54(9): 50-62. Gu Qingqing, Gao Like. Marx and Engels’ Theory of Civilization. JOURNAL OF ZHEJIANG UNIVERSITY, 2024, 54(9): 50-62.
链接本文:  
https://www.zjujournals.com/soc/CN/10.3785/j.issn.1008-942X.CN33-6000/C.2023.11.021     或     https://www.zjujournals.com/soc/CN/Y2024/V54/I9/50
发表一流的成果,传播一流的发现,提供一流的新知

浙ICP备14002560号-5
版权所有 © 2009 浙江大学学报(人文社会科学版)    浙ICP备05074421号
地址:杭州市天目山路148号 邮编:310028 电话:0571-88273210 88925616 E-mail:zdxb_w@zju.edu.cn
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发  技术支持:support@magtech.com.cn