Global Energy Governance Transformation and China’s Strategic Choice
Zhou Yunheng1, Wu Lei2
1.School of Public Affairs, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China 2.Institute of International Relations, Yunnan University, Kunming 650091, China
Abstract:The solution to global energy and climate crisis requires global action and cooperation. The current dilemma of global energy governance is mainly manifested in the fact that individual energy poverty is far from eliminated, the energy security dilemma between countries still exists, and the global climate crisis is increasingly severe. Studies have concluded that the global energy governance system is in urgent need of change, but there are still divergent opinions on how to restructure it. All parties believe that China’s active participation is indispensable for global energy governance, but there is no consensus on what role China should play during the process. Thus, the core question discussed in this paper is how the global energy governance system should be restructured to tackle the energy and environmental challenges, and what strategic choices should China make during this process?To this end, this paper introduces the pressure-state-response (PSR) model as a theoretical analysis framework for global energy governance. It might reflect the contradiction between the growing energy demand of mankind and the unbalanced and inadequate development of energy in various countries from the perspective of pressure dimension. As a result, there are increasing deficits in development, security and governance related to energy and environmental issues for the international community to fulfill the obligation. In terms of responses, neither individuals, countries nor the international community could respond effectively.In order to solve the energy governance dilemma, this paper proposes a global energy governance initiative based on the hierarchy of human needs theory. It proposes that enhancing national energy supply should be the fundamental goal of global energy governance, that providing consumers with affordable energy service be a developmental goal, and that shaping a sustainable environment for the world be the long-term goal. Only by taking into account the individual, national and global-level goals can the global energy governance agenda be prevented from becoming an extension of power politics among major powers, and the risks posed by the energy and climate crises will be reduced.Facing global challenges such as energy supply security, energy poverty and climate change, China needs to uphold the concepts of a community with a shared future for mankind and green development, while promoting energy transformation, actively participating in climate governance, and working with other countries to build a clean and beautiful world. As an active participant in the global energy governance, China has been promoting the interconnection of energy infrastructure across countries, the multilateral energy cooperation mechanisms, and the inclusive concepts of energy security. These efforts contribute to China’s energy security and its ambition of being a responsible global power. Besides, China’s active participation will ensure the smooth flow of the global energy supply chain, maintain the stability of the international energy market and prices, and achieve the goal of sustainable energy for all advocated by the United Nations.
1 Haas P. M., “Addressing the global governance deficit,” Global Environmental Politics, Vol. 4, No. 4 (2004), pp. 1-15. 2 Goldthau A. & Witte J. M., “The role of rules and institutions in global energy: an introduction,” in Goldthau A. & Witte J. M. (eds.), Global Energy Governance: The New Rules of the Game, Washington, D. C.: Brookings Institute Press, 2010, pp. 1-22. 3 Pastukhova M. & Westphal K., “Governing the global energy transformation,” in Hafner M. & Tagliapietra S. (eds.), The Geopolitics of the Global Energy Transition, Berlin: Springer, 2020, pp. 341-364. 4 Shonali P. & Spreng D., “Measuring and monitoring energy poverty,” Energy Policy, Vol. 39, No. 12 (2011), pp. 7497-7504. 5 Dannreuther R., Energy Security, Cambridge: John Wiley & Sons, 2017. 6 Houghton J. T., Jenkins G. J. & Ephraums J. J., Climate Change: The IPCC Scientific Assessment, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990. 7 许勤华: 《新能源革命与全球能源治理变革》,《人民论坛·学术前沿》2021年第14期,第80-87页。 8 范必: 《中国能源市场化改革》,北京:中信出版社,2018年。 9 Graaf T. V. & Colgan J., “Global energy governance: a review and research agenda,” Palgrave Communications, Vol. 2, No. 1 (2016), pp. 1-12. 10 International Energy Agency, “China’s engagement in global energy governance,” 2016-04-16, https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264255845-en, 2023-07-10. 11 赵庆寺: 《G20与全球能源治理:角色设定与策略选择》,《当代世界与社会主义》2019年第1期,第142-148页。 12 吴磊、许剑: 《论能源安全的公共产品属性与能源安全共同体构建》,《国际安全研究》2020年第5期,第3-28页。 13 Kastner S. L., Pearson M. M. & Rector C., “China and global governance: opportunistic multilateralism,” Global Policy, Vol. 11, No. 1 (2020), pp. 164-169. 14 OECD, “Towards sustainable development: environmental indicators,” 1998-07-18, https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264163201-en, 2023-07-10. 15 International Energy Agency, World Energy Outlook 2022, https://iea.blob.core.windows.net/assets/830fe099-5530-48f2-a7c1-11f35d510983/WorldEnergyOutlook2022.pdf, 2023-07-10. 16 Yergin D., The New Map: Energy, Climate and the Clash of Nations, New York: Penguin Press, 2020. 17 Shukla P. R., Skea J. & Slade R. et al. (eds.), Climate Change 2022: Mitigation of Climate Change, https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/wg3/downloads/report/IPCC_AR6_WGIII_FullReport.pdf, 2023-07-10. 18 Chancel L., “Global carbon inequality over 1990-2019,” Nature Sustainability, Vol. 5, No. 11 (2022), pp. 931-938. 19 赵宏图: 《能源政治新生态与全球能源治理》,《当代世界》2023年第2期,第10-15页。 20 World Meteorological Organization, State of the Global Climate 2021, https://library.wmo.int/viewer/56300/download?file=1290_Statement_2021_en.pdf&type=pdf&navigator=1, 2023-07-10. 21 United Nations Environment Programme, Emissions Gap Report 2022: The Closing Window—Climate Crisis Calls for Rapid Transformation of Societies, https://wedocs.unep.org/bitstream/handle/20.500.11822/40874/EGR2022.pdf?sequence=3, 2023-07-10. 22 Brown O., “Climate change and forced migration: observations, projections and implications,” https://hdr.undp.org/system/files/documents/brownolipdf.pdf, 2023-07-10. 23 薛澜、关婷: 《多元国家治理模式下的全球治理》,《政治学研究》2021年第3期,第65-77页。 24 丁守海、徐政、江小鹏: 《新时代我国能源可持续发展评估研究》,《浙江大学学报(人文社会科学版)》2022年第2期,第57-72页。 25 国务院发展研究中心、壳牌国际有限公司: 《全球能源转型背景下的中国能源革命》,北京:中国发展出版社,2018年。 26 Maslow A. H., Motivation and Personality, New York: Harper & Row, 1954. 27 周云亨、方恺、叶瑞克: 《能源安全观演进与中国能源转型》,《东北亚论坛》2018年第6期,第80-91页。 28 联合国: 《变革我们的世界:2030年可持续发展议程》,https://undocs.org/zh/A/RES/70/1,2023年7月10日。 29 Ye R., Zhou Y. & Chen J. et al., “Natural gas security evaluation from a supply vs. demand perspective: a quantitative application of four As,” Energy Policy, Vol. 156, No. 9 (2021), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2021.112425, 2023-07-10. 30 Stern N., “Key elements of a global deal on climate change,” https://www.lse.ac.uk/granthaminstitute/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/Key-Elements-of-a-Global-Deal-Final-version-1300-30-4.pdf, 2023-07-10. 31 吴志成: 《全球治理对国家治理的影响》,《中国社会科学》2016年第6期,第22-28页。 32 UNFCCC, “Roadmap to US$100 billion,” https://unfccc.int/sites/default/files/resource/climate-finance-roadmap-to-us100-billion.pdf, 2023-07-10. 33 Council of the EU, “EU climate action: provisional agreement reached on Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM),” 2022-12-13, https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/press/press-releases/2022/12/13/eu-climate-action-provisional-agreement-reached-on-carbon-border-adjustment-mechanism-cbam/, 2023-07-10. 34 International Energy Agency, International Renewable Energy Agency & UN Climate Change High-level Champions, “The breakthrough agenda report 2022,” https://iea.blob.core.windows.net/assets/49ae4839-90a9-4d88-92bc-371e2b24546a/THEBREAKTHROUGHAGENDAREPORT2022.pdf, 2023-07-10. 35 Solomon B. D. & Krishna K., “The coming sustainable energy transition: history, strategies, and outlook,” Energy Policy, Vol. 39, No. 11 (2011), pp. 7422-7431. 36 中华人民共和国国务院新闻办公室: 《新时代的中国能源发展》,2020年12月21日,http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/2020-12/21/content_5571916.htm,2023年7月10日。 37 中华人民共和国外交部: 《全球安全倡议概念文件》,2023年2月21日,https://www.fmprc.gov.cn/web/wjbxw_new/202302/t20230221_11028322.shtml,2023年7月10日。 38 周云亨、陈佳巍、叶瑞克等: 《国家天然气安全评价指标体系的构建与应用》,《自然资源学报》2020年第11期,第2645-2654页。 39 王帆: 《对外依存与中国外交的战略自主》,《外交评论》2020年第2期,第1-22页。 40 美]罗伯特·基欧汉: 《局部全球化世界中的自由主义、权力与治理》,北京:北京大学出版社,2004年。 41 Philippe B. & Tu K. J., “Is China still a developing country, and why it matters for energy and climate,” https://people.climate.columbia.edu/projects/view/2118, 2023-07-10. 42 习近平: 《高举中国特色社会主义伟大旗帜 为全面建设社会主义现代化国家而团结奋斗——在中国共产党第二十次全国代表大会上的报告》,2022年10月16日,https://www.gov.cn/xinwen/2022-10/25/content_5721685.htm,2023年7月10日。 43 中华人民共和国外交部: 《关于全球治理变革和建设的中国方案》,2023年9月13日,http://newyork.fmprc.gov.cn/web/wjbxw_new/202309/t20230913_11142009.shtml,2023年12月13日。 44 习近平: 《继往开来,开启全球应对气候变化新征程——在气候雄心峰会上的讲话》,2020年12月12日,http://www.gov.cn/gongbao/content/2020/content_5570055.htm,2023年7月10日。 45 Fang K., Zhou Y. & Wang S. et al., “Assessing national renewable energy competitiveness of the G20,” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Vol. 93, No. 1 (2018), pp. 719-731. 46 习近平: 《坚定信心 共克时艰 共建更加美好的世界——在第七十六届联合国大会一般性辩论上的讲话》,2021年9月21日,http://politics.people.com.cn/n1/2021/0922/c1024-32232511.html,2023年7月10日。 47 Karlsson-Vinkhuyzen S. I., Jollands N. & Staudt L., “Global governance for sustainable energy: the contribution of a global public goods approach,” Ecological Economics, Vol. 83 (2012), pp. 11-18. 48 田旭、徐秀军: 《全球公共产品赤字及中国应对实践》,《世界经济与政治》2021年第9期,第128-154页。 49 鲁刚、毛吉康: 《全球能源治理:理论、趋势与中国路径》,北京:社会科学文献出版社,2018年。 50 习近平: 《携手迎接挑战,合作开创未来——在博鳌亚洲论坛2022年年会开幕式上的主旨演讲》,2022年4月21日,http://www.gov.cn/xinwen/2022-04/21/content_5686424.htm,2023年7月10日。 51 习近平: 《携手同行现代化之路——在中国共产党与世界政党高层对话会上的主旨讲话》,2023年3月15日,https://www.fmprc.gov.cn/chn/gxh/tyb/zyxw/202303/t20230315_11042301.html,2023年7月10日。 52 方恺、许安琪、何坚坚等: 《可持续发展目标实现进程中的环境效应分析》,《浙江大学学报(人文社会科学版)》2022年第3期,第100-119页。