Abstract:Since the 21st century, the relationship between Milton’s Paradise Lost and science fiction (SF) has gained more and more attention from the academic community, but the existing studies are either ambiguous or often off-target. Ambiguity refers to the emergence of the claims that Paradise Lost contains the “SF germ”, “can be described as SF” or “is SF”. Although it is clear from these statements that Milton’s Paradise Lost has very deep roots in SF, the claim that “Paradise Lost is SF” needs to be modified thoroughly. Off-targetness refers to the fact that Milton’s relationship with fantasy literature has received increasing critical attention, but such studies tend to be partial studies of “Milton and fantasy”, ignoring the relationship between “Milton and SF”.Based on a close reading of the text, the authors sort out the SF elements in Paradise Lost: the new universe (self-consistent cosmology+space travel), the new inhabitants (aliens+monster+mad scientist) and the new technology (the concept of virtual reality). First of all, due to the limitations of religious orthodox dogma, the cosmology in Paradise Lost revolves around three common religious locations: Heaven, Eden and Hell, which are subject to their respective laws and regulations. The separation of regimes in each world in Paradise Lost is the premise of Milton’s well-ordered universe. Within this cosmology, space travel becomes possible, referring mainly to the travels of Satan and Raphael. Through comparison, we can not only see the contrast between darkness and light through the divergent descriptions of the two space trips, but also discover the influence of the great geographical discoveries and Galileo’s telescope on Milton’s narrative poem. Secondly, the appearance of a new world attracts new inhabitants, referring mainly to the aliens, namely, the angels. Among the poet’s angels, the most influential one for future generations is the fallen angel Satan, who may be regarded as a colonizer of the earth and also one of the prototypes of “monster” and “mad scientist” in modern SF. Thirdly, inspired by Yan Feng’s re-reading the classical Chinese novel TheDream of the Red Chamber from the perspective of virtual reality, the authors propose that the concept of virtual reality technology in the 21st century has already taken shape in Paradise Lost. Specifically, it is related to the reflection, dream and illusion in Paradise Lost, i.e. Eve’s reflection in the lake, Eve’s dream created by Satan and the hallucinatory vision of the rebel angels. These three groups of SF elements analyzed above together constitute the “SF impulses” of this epic, revealing the future direction of the many thought experiments in Paradise Lost and the intertwined ideological understones of science and religion.The imagination of new universe, new inhabitants and new technology in Paradise Lost has left abundant implications of SF for future generations. Taking “SF impulses” as a keyword, the article re-reads the classic work Paradise Lost, offering three innovative points. First, the research topic is new. On the basis of a familiar knowledge of the history of SF and classic literature, this article selects Paradise Lost, a classic text of the seventeenth century, as the research object, and connects modern SF with early modern classic literature. Second, the research idea is original. The general framework of the article—“new universe”, “new inhabitants” and “new technology”—integrates modern SF with classic epic. Third, the research methodology is innovative. Science is indispensable to the germination of SF, and Milton lived in 17th-century England, which witnessed the geographical discovery and the first scientific revolution. Tracing the origins of modern SF in connection with Paradise Lost is of great significance: it helps to further clarify and enhance the status and value of SF in contemporary times; it helps to maintain the timelessness and immortality of classic and traditional literature; and it promotes the crossing, comparing, and convergence of the traditional epic and modern SF.
1 Roberts A., Science Fiction, London: Routledge, 2000. 2 英]亚当·罗伯茨: 《科幻小说史》,马小悟译,北京:北京大学出版社,2010年。 3 Dodds L., “Death and the ‘paradice within’ in Paradise Lost and Margaret Atwood’s Oryx and Crake,” Milton Studies, Vol. 56 (2015), pp. 115-150. 4 Sueda K. C., “Milton in science fiction and fantasy,” Milton Studies, Vol. 63, No. 1 (2021), pp. 136-153. 5 美]詹姆斯·冈恩、郭建中编: 《科幻之路第一卷:从吉尔伽美什到威尔斯》,北京:北京大学出版社,2008年。 6 Suvin D., Positions and Presuppositions in Science Fiction, Kent:?Kent State University Press, 1988. 7 Knoppers L. L. & Semenza G. M. C. (eds.), Milton in Popular Culture, New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2006. 8 Desser D., “Blade Runner. Science fiction & Transcendence,” Literature/Film Quarterly, Vol. 13, No. 3 (1985), pp. 172-179. 9 Raymond J., Milton’s Angels: The Early-Modern Imagination, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010. 10 Milton J., Paradise Lost, in Hughes M. Y. (ed.), Complete Poems and Major Prose of John Milton, New York: The Odyssey Press, 1957. 11 Edwards K. L., Milton and the Natural World: Science and Poetry in Paradise Lost, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999. 12 陈文龙、王珂编著: 《开普勒的梦:太空探险科幻小说赏析》,广州:广东世界图书出版公司,2009年。 13 张箭: 《地理大发现研究:15—17世纪》,北京:商务印书馆,2002年。 14 郭圣铭: 《地理大发现》,北京:商务印书馆,1962年。 15 Dobranski S. B., “Pondering Satan’s shield in Milton’s Paradise Lost,” English Literary Renaissance, Vol. 35, No. 3 (2005), pp. 490-506. 16 Wester E., “Starry messengers: Galileo and the role of the observer in Paradise Lost,” in Catherine G. M. (ed.), Milton and the New Scientific Age, New York: Routledge, 2019, pp. 127-149. 17 Trubowitz R., “The Fall and Galileo’s law of falling bodies: geometrization vs. observing and describing things in Paradise Lost,” in Catherine G. M. (ed.), Milton and the New Scientific Age, New York: Routledge, 2019, pp. 79-107. 18 俄]鲍·格·库兹涅佐夫: 《伽利略传》,陈太先、马世元译,北京:商务印书馆,2001年。 19 Tanner J. S., “‘And every star perhaps a world of destined habitation’: Milton and moonmen,” Extrapolation, Vol. 30, No. 3 (1989), pp. 267-279. 20 Knight D., “Science fiction of the Seventeenth Century,” The Seventeenth Century, Vol. 1, No. 1 (1986), pp. 69-79. 21 Raymond J., “With the tongues of angels: angelic conversation in Paradise Lost and Seventeenth-Century England,” in Marshall P. & Walsham A. (eds.), Angels in the Early Modern World, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006, pp. 256-281. 22 Atwood M., “Aliens have taken the place of angels,” 2005-06-16, http://www.theguardian.com/film/2005/jun/17/sciencefictionfantasyandhorror.margaretatwood, 2022-03-20. 23 Danielson D., Paradise Lost and the Cosmological Revolution, New York: Cambridge University Press, 2014. 24 Hawkins Z., “Flights and fancy: wings and the ethics of knowledge in Paradise Lost,” Milton Quarterly, Vol. 53, No. 3 (2019), pp. 119-142. 25 Milton J., Samson Agonistes, in Hughes M. Y. (ed.), Complete Poems and Major Prose of John Milton, New York: The Odyssey Press, 1957. 26 郝田虎: 《〈失乐园〉〈弗兰肯斯坦〉和〈机械姬〉中的科学普罗米修斯主义》,《外国文学》2019年第1期,第3-14页。 27 严锋: 《假作真时真亦假:虚拟现实视野下的〈红楼梦〉》,《中国比较文学》2020年第2期,第2-17页。 28 Sherman W. R. & Craig A. B., Understanding Virtual Reality: Interface, Application, and Design, New York: Elsevier, 2003. 29 胡家峦: 《文艺复兴时期英国诗歌与园林传统》,北京:北京大学出版社,2008年。 30 美]迈克尔·海姆: 《从界面到网络空间——虚拟实在的形而上学》,金吾伦、刘钢译,上海:上海科技教育出版社,2000年。 31 法]布鲁诺·阿纳迪、帕斯卡·吉顿、纪尧姆·莫罗: 《虚拟现实与增强现实——神话与现实》,侯文军、蒋之阳等译,北京:机械工业出版社,2019年。 32 Welburn J., “Divided labors: work, nature, and the utopian impulse in John Milton’s Paradise Lost,” Studies in Philology, Vol. 116, No.3 (2019), pp. 506-538. 33 美]詹姆斯·冈恩: 《交错的世界:世界科幻图史》,姜倩译,上海:上海人民出版社,2020年。 34 Hackenbracht R., “Galactic Milton: angelic robots and the fall into barbarism in Isaac Asimov’s Foundation series,” Milton Studies, Vol. 57 (2016), pp. 293-321. 35 杨周翰: 《十七世纪英国文学》,上海:上海人民出版社,2016年。 36 Flannagan R., “Rev. of Milton and the Natural World: Science and Poetry in Paradise Lost by Karen Edwards,” Milton Quarterly, Vol. 34, No. 4 (2000), pp. 132-134. 37 Darwin C., The Autobiography of Charles Darwin and Selected Letters, New York: Dover Publications, 1958. 38 Bickford I., “‘Awful doubt’: Milton and Darwin in the land of fire,” Milton Studies, Vol. 58 (2017), pp. 103-124. 39 美]罗伯特·金·默顿: 《十七世纪英国的科学、技术与社会》,范岱年、吴忠、蒋效东译,成都:四川人民出版社,1986年。