浙江大学学报(人文社会科学版)
 
   2025年1月13日 星期一   首页 |  期刊介绍 |  编委会 |  投稿指南 |  信息服务 |  期刊订阅 |  联系我们 |  预印本过刊 |  浙江省高校学报研究会栏目 |  留言板 |  English Version
浙江大学学报(人文社会科学版)  2013, Vol. 43 Issue (3): 5-20    DOI: 10.3785/j.issn.1008-942X.2012.12.111
栏目 最新目录| 下期目录| 过刊浏览| 高级检索 |
''一业一会''还是''一业多会''?----基于行业协会集体物品供给的比较研究
郁建兴 何宾
''One Industry, One Association'' or ''One Industry, Many Associations''?A Comparative Study from the Perspective of Provision of Collective Goods by Industrial Associations
Yu Jianxing He Bin

全文: PDF (4483 KB)  
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 

“一业一会”制度与行业协会最优规模的联合约束限制了行业协会数量以及协会内可以容纳的会员数,从而影响集体物品的供给与消费。但是,取消“一业一会”制度可能引发行业协会运行逻辑的转变,进而导致行业协会最优规模缩小以及选择性供给行业性集体物品,从而加剧行业利益代表的碎片化,弱化行业自律,影响行业协会追求行业整体利益的能力。因此,在取消“一业一会”制度时,应基于行业协会运行逻辑的转变,建构行业协会体系与内部均衡机制,防范行业协会集体物品供给出现异化。

服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入我的书架
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
郁建兴 何宾
关键词 行业协会组织规模制度比较集体物品供给    
Abstract

 Industrial associations across China are bound by the policy of ″one industry, one association.″ The administrative regulation prescribes that additional industrial associations with same or similar business scope as the existing one are not allowed to be established in the same administrative district. Taking into consideration the differences between industrial associations and other ordinary groups or clubs, we propose a model of the relation between the size of an industrial association and its performance in providing collective goods, and it indicates that the latter is constrained by the former. Empirical data confirm that this theoretical conclusion derives from the model. So, the principle of ″one industry, one association″ limits the number of industrial associations in a certain industry, and the optimal size of an industrial association limits the number of members that can be enrolled in an industrial association. Because of these two constraints, some enterprises in the industry that contain a large number of potential members cannot join the current association without affecting its performance, neither can they set up a new association to supply collective goods for themselves, thereby affecting the supply and consumption of collective goods in the industry.
However, the removal of the principle of ″one industry, one association″ will cause industrial associations to operate as clubs and fall into the strong control of their members. In the context of ″one industry, many associations,″ associations are likely to be free riders on providing collective goods which benefit the whole industry. Correspondingly, industrial associations will transform themselves into clubs from original industrial organizations representing the interests of the whole industry. The more associations act as clubs, the more excessive attention will be paid to the internal interests of the associations rather than to the whole industry. Accordingly, interest representation by industrial associations will be fragmented. In addition, the competitive environment resulting from the principle of ″one industry, many associations″ will probably lead to associations overdependence on their members. As a result, associations will to some extent lose their ability to integrate interest appeals of their members and to pursue the interests of the industry as a whole.
To overcome problems caused by industrial associations transformation towards clubs in the new institutional context of ″one industry, many associations,″ appropriate industrial association system needs to be set up when the administrative regulations of industrial associations are modified. If the system of industrial associations can be set up to integrate interest appeals of all industrial associations and to supply collective goods which benefit the whole industry, the deficient performance of public functions and the fragmentation of interest representation caused by the transformation of the operational logic of associations can be avoided. To avoid excessive control by members, and to obtain independence relative to their members in some degree, industrial associations need to find ways to restrict the influences of their members by means of undertaking certain functions transferred to them by the government and selfimprovement, and develop into a balanced status among the members, the government and themselves so as to avoid member manipulation, political dependency and corporatization. Industrial associations will therefore realize selfgovernance through structuring their internal balance mechanism and establishing an operational mode.

Key wordsindustrial association    size of organization    comparative study of administrative systems    provision of collective goods   
    
引用本文:   
郁建兴 何宾. ''一业一会''还是''一业多会''?----基于行业协会集体物品供给的比较研究[J]. 浙江大学学报(人文社会科学版), 2013, 43(3): 5-20. Yu Jianxing He Bin. ''One Industry, One Association'' or ''One Industry, Many Associations''?A Comparative Study from the Perspective of Provision of Collective Goods by Industrial Associations. , 2013, 43(3): 5-20.
链接本文:  
https://www.zjujournals.com/soc/CN/10.3785/j.issn.1008-942X.2012.12.111     或     https://www.zjujournals.com/soc/CN/Y2013/V43/I3/5
发表一流的成果,传播一流的发现,提供一流的新知

浙ICP备14002560号-5
版权所有 © 2009 浙江大学学报(人文社会科学版)    浙ICP备05074421号
地址:杭州市天目山路148号 邮编:310028 电话:0571-88273210 88925616 E-mail:zdxb_w@zju.edu.cn
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发  技术支持:support@magtech.com.cn